3 link vs 4 link
#1
Registered Users
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ny
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0ho
3 link vs 4 link
Tons are in my not so immediate future. I don't plan on changing the arms if I dont have to. I can fab, I can weld.
That being said. I originally planned on the rough country long arm upgrade and shackle relocation to take my 4.5'' lift into the 6.5'' range with proper front flex, short arms are trash, and have no place on a jeep over 3.5'' of lift (perfect for 3.5 lift or under)
That being said, I've started to look at the critical path 3 link kit, so If the pros could come in and school me on the pros and cons of the iro 3 link vs the rough country 4 link, it would be awesome.
Please don't come in here and say clayton anything, I know they rock, the problem is, so do they and they charge accordingly.
That being said. I originally planned on the rough country long arm upgrade and shackle relocation to take my 4.5'' lift into the 6.5'' range with proper front flex, short arms are trash, and have no place on a jeep over 3.5'' of lift (perfect for 3.5 lift or under)
That being said, I've started to look at the critical path 3 link kit, so If the pros could come in and school me on the pros and cons of the iro 3 link vs the rough country 4 link, it would be awesome.
Please don't come in here and say clayton anything, I know they rock, the problem is, so do they and they charge accordingly.
#2
CF Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,685
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Year: 92
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Originally Posted by The Blacksmith
Tons are in my not so immediate future. I don't plan on changing the arms if I dont have to. I can fab, I can weld.
That being said. I originally planned on the rough country long arm upgrade and shackle relocation to take my 4.5'' lift into the 6.5'' range with proper front flex, short arms are trash, and have no place on a jeep over 3.5'' of lift (perfect for 3.5 lift or under)
That being said, I've started to look at the critical path 3 link kit, so If the pros could come in and school me on the pros and cons of the iro 3 link vs the rough country 4 link, it would be awesome.
Please don't come in here and say clayton anything, I know they rock, the problem is, so do they and they charge accordingly.
That being said. I originally planned on the rough country long arm upgrade and shackle relocation to take my 4.5'' lift into the 6.5'' range with proper front flex, short arms are trash, and have no place on a jeep over 3.5'' of lift (perfect for 3.5 lift or under)
That being said, I've started to look at the critical path 3 link kit, so If the pros could come in and school me on the pros and cons of the iro 3 link vs the rough country 4 link, it would be awesome.
Please don't come in here and say clayton anything, I know they rock, the problem is, so do they and they charge accordingly.
Ive seen the iro system in action and it works pretty well, a buddy of mine runs it on his and seemes to love it.
Also, if you can fab... Why not build your own 3 link or radius arms for the front?
#6
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 87
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
If you can fab I would look at building your own. A lot of companies have kits available to build your own.
Do a lot of research if you go to buy a kit. There are a lot of high quality kits out there, just watch for reviews and ask for pics of how they flex. Also keep in mind ppl will not admit the bought a kit that doesnt flex well, or was poorly designed.
Do a lot of research if you go to buy a kit. There are a lot of high quality kits out there, just watch for reviews and ask for pics of how they flex. Also keep in mind ppl will not admit the bought a kit that doesnt flex well, or was poorly designed.
Trending Topics
#8
Former Sponsor
Join Date: May 2010
Location: meriden Ct
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
those long arm kits are not 4 links. they are radius arms. IRO is not a 3 link either, it is also a radius arm, with one upper link.
a true 3 link will work better than any of the above.
The easiest way to describe the difference is this, grab a paper towel roll with both hands, one on either end. with your arms out straight turn the roll like your axle would articulate. at some point in its range the tube would need to twist to keep articulating. with a radius arm, this is never allowed to happen. the links bind and stop travel.
with a true 3 link, this never happens.
This is also true with a single upper radius arm. But there are other advantages to a true 3 link, like anti-squat. they climb much better, and are more stable.
If you have the ability, fab a true 3 link. That is my next project.
Dont get me wrong the radius arms work very well, but there are better designs to be had.
I hate to post an outside link, but read this. all the info you could want
http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showt...ight=totm+link
a true 3 link will work better than any of the above.
The easiest way to describe the difference is this, grab a paper towel roll with both hands, one on either end. with your arms out straight turn the roll like your axle would articulate. at some point in its range the tube would need to twist to keep articulating. with a radius arm, this is never allowed to happen. the links bind and stop travel.
with a true 3 link, this never happens.
This is also true with a single upper radius arm. But there are other advantages to a true 3 link, like anti-squat. they climb much better, and are more stable.
If you have the ability, fab a true 3 link. That is my next project.
Dont get me wrong the radius arms work very well, but there are better designs to be had.
I hate to post an outside link, but read this. all the info you could want
http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showt...ight=totm+link
Last edited by ct67_72; 10-22-2011 at 07:31 AM.
#11
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0, comp cam, 99 intake, apn header, neon injectors, Thunderbolt 2.5" High Flow Cat
#12
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0, comp cam, 99 intake, apn header, neon injectors, Thunderbolt 2.5" High Flow Cat
#13
Assuming you already have some kind of aftermarket arms from your original lift, do the $200 drops. When you get your real axles, fab up some real longarms. Not as cool and trendy, but definitely not trash.
#14
Registered Users
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ny
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0ho
drop brackets are worse than short arms, there is no reason to give up even more ground clearence vs just doing it right. my .02
#15
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: temple, tx
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
i like the 4 link over the 3 link, just sems like theres more strength in the 4, if its built rite, you shouldnt need a track bar, that can limit flex. i built a radius long arm out of 2 in sguare tubing with 1.25 heims. it works fine, soon to 4 link the rear. i think the drop brackets defeats the purpose of an offroad vehicle, if its used that way, lowering the arms 4 in ??????? especially short arms . my 02
Last edited by xjjs90; 10-22-2011 at 09:23 PM.