Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

What do you think of the new Cherokees?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2014 | 09:02 PM
  #1  
CherokeePride's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Stillwater, OK
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 Straight 6 HO
Default What do you think of the new Cherokees?

http://www.autoweek.com/article/2014...&utm_campaign=

The grey one doesn't look half bad, and the GC turbo diesel sounds pretty sweet. But I still like my 98.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2014 | 10:47 PM
  #2  
96xj_2whlr's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: claremore oklahoma
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
Default

call me old school but i want something that i don't mind denting up and scratching with some off-road capability and easy to mantain. The trailhawk seems pretty cool but if i had one i dont think i would be taking it any where near the lake i live by.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2014 | 10:37 AM
  #3  
93gc40's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 3
From: Visalia, Kalifornia, ussa
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Nice small SUV/mall crawler..... Not the rig I would choose for weekend wheeling trips.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2014 | 02:46 PM
  #4  
Meke417's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: S. Jersey
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.o
Default

It looks weird to me! Definitely not somthing I would take off the asphalt!
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2014 | 03:35 PM
  #5  
BigSquirrly89's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

There a nice car... Not worthy of the name though
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2014 | 07:18 PM
  #6  
Flowpro's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: Waterloo, Iowa
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

I went to the local Jeep dealership recently to check out the new Cherokees and Grands. I would have to say i would be leaning towards buying a new Grand Cherokee over the new Cherokees. I just can't get over the headlights on the new Cherokees. They also didn't have any Trailhawks on the lot for comparision either.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2014 | 07:58 PM
  #7  
PurpleToxin505's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 5
From: Albuquerque, NM
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

What do you think of the new Cherokees?-img_33232554543584.jpg
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2014 | 08:58 PM
  #8  
RegularGuy's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 494
Likes: 4
From: Ohio
Year: 98
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.0L
Default

I'm going to try and get inside one soon. Local place has a Trailhawk out front that wants me to look it over.

The back seat looks roomy, and if its anything like the '12 Compass i once rented it should have a comfy interior...
which is my issue with it. The Cherokee is weighed down with all kinds of creature comforts and air bags. Granted some of them are because Big Brother thinks we need a personal bounce house, but i built a Patriot online and it had more attractive offroad features, and less unwanted ones like fancy touch navigation, all for a lower price.

But i havent driven one, so who knows. maybe its magical if you drive it.
Reply
Old May 4, 2014 | 12:23 AM
  #9  
CherokeePride's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Stillwater, OK
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 Straight 6 HO
Default

[QUOTE="RegularGuy;2841333"]I'm going to try and get inside one soon. Local place has a Trailhawk out front that wants me to look it over.=QUOTE]

How was the Trailhawk test drive?
Reply
Old May 4, 2014 | 12:33 AM
  #10  
andrewmp6's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,014
Likes: 17
From: Louisville,KY
Model: Cherokee
Default

I like the fc and j12 better http://www.carscoops.com/2012/03/jee...st-safari.html
Reply
Old May 4, 2014 | 07:24 PM
  #11  
CherokeePride's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Stillwater, OK
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 Straight 6 HO
Default

Originally Posted by andrewmp6
Holy Crap!! Those look amazing. I would be all over that J-12 if it was a production vehicle.
Reply
Old May 4, 2014 | 07:45 PM
  #12  
Kingfisher's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 552
Likes: 1
From: Central Indiana
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

It might be ok but they shouldn't have called it a Cherokee!
Reply
Old May 4, 2014 | 08:47 PM
  #13  
afriberg's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Doesn't the new cherokee have independent suspension front and rear?
Reply
Old May 4, 2014 | 09:05 PM
  #14  
black label's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 Litre
Default

I was reading an article on yahoo or msn just a few days ago about 10 cars that the manufacturer ruined.

The Cherokee was prominently featured and the main complaint on the new one was the headlights. I noticed their stock XJ picture was right hand drive as well.
Reply
Old May 4, 2014 | 10:33 PM
  #15  
dmill89's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 918
Likes: 6
From: Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Default

Originally Posted by afriberg
Doesn't the new cherokee have independent suspension front and rear?
Yes, and it is based on the same platform as the Dart with transverse-mount FWD or FWD biased AWD.


The "Trail-Hawk" ($30k+) is reasonably capable off-road (probably about equivalent to a stock XJ with A/T tires on it, maybe a little better) but is limited as to how it can be modified (at least in a cost-effective DIY manner).


The other models may have a little more capability than the average small/mid-sized cross-over but I wouldn't attempt to take them on a trail or even a rough/heavily rutted logging or fire road, as they have limited ground-clearance (especially ground to body) and a bunch of low-hanging plastic cladding, wiring, hoses, etc. to be damaged.

Last edited by dmill89; May 5, 2014 at 05:10 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 AM.