Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

Sketchup cherokee model

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2013, 12:59 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Keiffith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: TBD
Default Sketchup cherokee model

here is some pics of a jeep cherokee i modified in sketchup. the software is free, so its not the greatest, but once you get the hang of it you can do some neat stuff.

pictured motor is an OM617








[/size][/color]
Old 07-10-2013, 06:23 PM
  #2  
CF Veteran
 
N20jeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,685
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Year: 92
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

thats pretty cool
Old 07-10-2013, 07:29 PM
  #3  
CF Veteran
 
xjfirefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Rochester
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

What program is that?
Old 07-10-2013, 07:36 PM
  #4  
CF Veteran
 
xjfirefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Rochester
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Nevermind, I'm dumb......
Old 07-12-2013, 11:24 PM
  #5  
Cherokee Forum Vendor
 
Lead Foot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lynden, WA
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

The perception view that you are using is kinda funky.

I use the same original model for all my work but I have imported it into Solidworks.

Last edited by Lead Foot; 07-12-2013 at 11:27 PM.
Old 07-13-2013, 07:19 PM
  #6  
CF Veteran
 
JerrytheJeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Year: 89
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
Default

Originally Posted by Lead Foot
The perception view that you are using is kinda funky.

I use the same original model for all my work but I have imported it into Solidworks.
Where can I get that solidworks file
Old 07-13-2013, 08:18 PM
  #7  
CF Veteran
 
rmoore1031's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Bentonville, AR
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6 4.0
Default

CG is considered fabrication? That is pretty cool man. How long did that take to do?
Old 07-14-2013, 10:29 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Keiffith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: TBD
Default

Originally Posted by rmoore1031
CG is considered fabrication? That is pretty cool man. How long did that take to do?
it was the most fitting section IMHO since its not real, and its a concept for fabrication.

i have atleast 50 hours into this model. im not all that good at polishing the glitches, but i mostly did this for a organic sketch that i could change and work through my ideas.
Old 07-14-2013, 11:39 PM
  #9  
CF Veteran
 
JerrytheJeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Year: 89
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
Default

Originally Posted by Keiffith

it was the most fitting section IMHO since its not real, and its a concept for fabrication.

i have atleast 50 hours into this model. im not all that good at polishing the glitches, but i mostly did this for a organic sketch that i could change and work through my ideas.
Read the stickies at the top of each section. If you're drawings aren't to scale and you design something on it you will have a much harder time trying to make whatever it was.

That's why I like cardboard. Its renewable, lightweight, easy to shape, and each piece instantly becomes a template to transfer onto your material.
Old 07-17-2013, 08:46 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Keiffith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: TBD
Default

Originally Posted by JerrytheJeep
Read the stickies at the top of each section. If you're drawings aren't to scale and you design something on it you will have a much harder time trying to make whatever it was.

That's why I like cardboard. Its renewable, lightweight, easy to shape, and each piece instantly becomes a template to transfer onto your material.
its to scale, and i see you have an appreciation for the fine arts of CAD, and cardboard is great, but doesnt give you the full picture.
Old 07-19-2013, 09:53 AM
  #11  
CF Veteran
 
Kris smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ramona ca
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

You mean thats a benz 5 cyl deisel ? Thats a cool motor and all but not much power at all the 617 does well in my car but i would hate to have it in my jeep i thing a om603 would be better
Old 07-20-2013, 01:14 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Keiffith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: TBD
Default

Originally Posted by Kris smith
You mean thats a benz 5 cyl deisel ? Thats a cool motor and all but not much power at all the 617 does well in my car but i would hate to have it in my jeep i thing a om603 would be better
OM603 is the beginning of the computer controled garbage, and im in no mood to deal with codes.

the OM617 is not a terribly powerful motor, but it was in a 4000 lb car, so putting it in a 4000lb SUV should be fine, as im not trying to get good 1/4 mile times, just a reliable winter/mud DD jeep
Old 07-20-2013, 04:45 PM
  #13  
CF Veteran
 
Kris smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ramona ca
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Im just saying it wouldnt be my choice i love the motor its reliable but it barly moves my car i couldnt imagine it in a jeep. Yes the 603 has sensors but it is still a mechanical injection pump and thats what you want. And what trans are you thinking of running a bellhousing adaptor for the aw4 or gunna try and mod a 722.3 to work in there ?
Old 10-18-2013, 09:16 AM
  #14  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Keiffith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: TBD
Default

Originally Posted by Kris smith
Im just saying it wouldnt be my choice i love the motor its reliable but it barly moves my car i couldnt imagine it in a jeep. Yes the 603 has sensors but it is still a mechanical injection pump and thats what you want. And what trans are you thinking of running a bellhousing adaptor for the aw4 or gunna try and mod a 722.3 to work in there ?
reliabiltiy/simplicity>power is the point of the swap.

im going to use a AX15 manual to get more of that power to the road, and to have more control over the vehicle, as well as no worries of tranmission failure.
Old 10-18-2013, 10:35 AM
  #15  
CF Veteran
 
Battle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 2,562
Received 250 Likes on 168 Posts
Year: 1999
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Keiffith
reliabiltiy/simplicity>power is the point of the swap.

im going to use a AX15 manual to get more of that power to the road, and to have more control over the vehicle, as well as no worries of tranmission failure.
How is a 30 year old turbo 5 cyl more simple than a 4.0? I mean, I know those engines will last a life time but so will a 4.0. Plus, a 4.0 is more powerful and more responsive. Is your only motive the want for diesel fuel?


Quick Reply: Sketchup cherokee model



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 PM.