Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

Should i get this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2010, 10:28 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
jd2311900's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: clarkston, MI
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default Should i get this?

I went and took a look at an 86 cherokee 2door. i live in michigan and this thing had no rust. floors looks good with a flashlight. It's a 2.8 5 speed 4x4, 2.8 was just rebuilt. new alternator, water pump, shocks, and all new exhaust from the cat back. He told me $2000 and its mine. I was thinking $1500. i've heard good and bad things about the 2.8.
Old 02-18-2010, 10:41 AM
  #2  
Seasoned Member
 
Brad M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by jd2311900
I went and took a look at an 86 cherokee 2door. i live in michigan and this thing had no rust. floors looks good with a flashlight. It's a 2.8 5 speed 4x4, 2.8 was just rebuilt. new alternator, water pump, shocks, and all new exhaust from the cat back. He told me $2000 and its mine. I was thinking $1500. i've heard good and bad things about the 2.8.
Absolutely NOOOOOOOO. The 2.8 is pure junk. I can find used '90s models for that price with all the power goodies and the 4.0 motor. The only way I'd consider buying that jeep is if I could get it for under $500, and I would use it as a buildup rig and swap in the 4.0, lift, bumpers, lockers, etc.

How do you plan to use it? Daily driver/commuter? Build project?
Old 02-18-2010, 10:41 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
jeepdavetj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Campobello, SC
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

2.8 is a turd. But you can change that to a 3.4 and it should be better.
Old 02-18-2010, 10:42 AM
  #4  
Seasoned Member
 
Brad M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by jeepdavetj
2.8 is a turd. But you can change that to a 3.4 and it should be better.
A 3.4? Are you talkin' Chevy, Toyota,... ? Why would he not just swap it for the 4.0?
Old 02-18-2010, 10:46 AM
  #5  
CF Veteran
 
winston427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,900
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

That is wasy to high of an asking price for a 86 in any condition. Give it some time and search around a little. The 2.8 V6 is underpowered and unreliable. You should be able to find a Cherokee in good condition with the much more reliable 4.0 for under 2K.
Old 02-18-2010, 10:52 AM
  #6  
CF Veteran
 
ol"blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tenn. and Mich.
Posts: 28,068
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Year: 2004
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.7L V8
Default

Originally Posted by winston427
That is wasy to high of an asking price for a 86 in any condition. Give it some time and search around a little. The 2.8 V6 is underpowered and unreliable. You should be able to find a Cherokee in good condition with the much more reliable 4.0 for under 2K.
X2. I say pass on it.
Dan
Old 02-18-2010, 11:08 AM
  #7  
G_P
Senior Member
 
G_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Middlesex County CT
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 H.O
Default

You cant easily swap a 4.0 in place of the 2.8 because the engine compartments are slightly different.

just a heads up.
Old 02-18-2010, 11:16 AM
  #8  
Member
Thread Starter
 
jd2311900's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: clarkston, MI
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

i have a 2000 with the 4.0 as a project. as far as unreliable. the motor was just rebuilt, what was bad about them? i had an s10 and it seemed ok.
Thanks for all of the reply's by the way.
Old 02-18-2010, 11:33 AM
  #9  
CF Veteran
 
89Laredo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,280
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Year: 1996
Engine: 4.0
Default

The 2.8 used a 2-barrel Carb and had 115 hp and 150 lb·ft.
Now, compare that to the 4.0l Fuel Injected engine: 173hp for Renix, with 215 Ft lbs. Average of 190hp and 225 lb-ft for HO engines, and 193hp and 245 lb-ft in 2000-01.

Not only does the 4.0 have more power and torque, it is also much stronger. More reliable due to the fuel injection, and is just an all together better engine.

Originally Posted by Brad M.
A 3.4? Are you talkin' Chevy, Toyota,... ? Why would he not just swap it for the 4.0?
Yes, 3.4 Chevy V6.
A 4.0 would be a hard swap, you would have to get a wiring harness out of another jeep, the motor, the trans, Shifter, Tcase, etc. I dont know what you would do about the motor mounts...

Last edited by 89Laredo; 02-18-2010 at 11:45 AM.
Old 02-18-2010, 11:36 AM
  #10  
CF Veteran
 
djlarroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Definitely pass. You can get something better for less. Just wait.
Old 02-18-2010, 11:36 AM
  #11  
Seasoned Member
 
Brad M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by jd2311900
i have a 2000 with the 4.0 as a project. as far as unreliable. the motor was just rebuilt, what was bad about them? i had an s10 and it seemed ok.
Thanks for all of the reply's by the way.
So this other one you're thinking of buying would just be a commuter, right? If you're just getting to and from work and stuff, I suppose it would suit those needs. The 2.8 V6 is anemic, weak, problematic, trouble-prone, a piece of crap... shall I go on? Seriously, if you're going to buy a 24 yr old jeep it's WAY overpriced. I guarantee you can find something newer with the 4.0 for the same price. Sounds like the guy is just trying to recoup some of the cash he just dumped into it. If you really need to know specific problematic areas with the 2.8, go to NAXJA and do a search on that motor and have fun reading all the threads bashing it.
Old 02-18-2010, 12:08 PM
  #12  
Member
Thread Starter
 
jd2311900's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: clarkston, MI
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

ok im going to pass.
Old 02-18-2010, 12:14 PM
  #13  
Seasoned Member
 
Brad M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Defiance665
Yes, 3.4 Chevy V6.
A 4.0 would be a hard swap, you would have to get a wiring harness out of another jeep, the motor, the trans, Shifter, Tcase, etc. I dont know what you would do about the motor mounts...
Thanks for posting the numbers on those motors. I was going to put them up for the OP to see, but you beat me to it.

As for the swap, you really think the 3.4 would be a LESS-INVOLVED swap than the 4.0? I would argue that...
Old 02-18-2010, 12:18 PM
  #14  
CF Veteran
 
89Laredo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,280
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Year: 1996
Engine: 4.0
Default

I didnt say it would be less involved...
All I did was clarify on someone elses post. I then continued to post my opinion on the 4.0 swap.
Old 02-18-2010, 12:24 PM
  #15  
Seasoned Member
 
Brad M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Ah, no worries. Thanks for the clarification.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:05 AM.