Should I buy a 2016 Cherokee 4x4 Latitude 75th Edition
I am looking to trade in my 2015 Renegade for a bigger Jeep and was looking at the 2016 Cherokee but was wondering if you've had issues with yours, would you buy it now?
Please help I am test driving/ possibly trading my Renegade tomorrow.
Thank you.
Please help I am test driving/ possibly trading my Renegade tomorrow.
Thank you.
CF Veteran
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 3,683
Likes: 8
From: Northern New Mexico
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
None of jeeps new products are worth buying. Only one I would consider is a JKU and that's only if I had money to blow.
Do a google search for jeep reliability and its a long list of problems with them since fiat bought chrysler out.Only thing with a jeep name i would buy is a wrangler anything else i would pass on.If you want a suv look at toyota honda and even mazda.
Seasoned Member
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 467
Likes: 6
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0l
I would echo what everyone else has said.
To offer a different view, my father has a '16 Cherokee Latitude with the 6 cyl and he loves it. He doesn't enjoy wrenching on cars like us here on the forum; he's the type of guy who buys a car new from the dealership, let's them do all the maintence, and puts 70-100k on it before trading it in. So far he has been raving about it BUT he has only had it for like six weeks so take all of this with a grain of salt.
To offer a different view, my father has a '16 Cherokee Latitude with the 6 cyl and he loves it. He doesn't enjoy wrenching on cars like us here on the forum; he's the type of guy who buys a car new from the dealership, let's them do all the maintence, and puts 70-100k on it before trading it in. So far he has been raving about it BUT he has only had it for like six weeks so take all of this with a grain of salt.
I'm going to +1 the nope. If you need a cute-ute, I'd have to say the Mazda CX3 or CX5 would be my picks. The only way Jeep will get any of my money is if they hit an absolute home-run with the next gen Wrangler and it doesn't have all the trans and wiring issues they've had with the Cherokee, 200 and other Fiat-based rushed to production stuff they've been putting out.
Trending Topics
CF Veteran
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 12
From: Tarpon Springs, FL / Denver, CO
Year: '98
Engine: 4.0 I6
Agreed, Cherokee XJ or get something else
Jeep's lineup is pretty much luxury SUV's or econoboxes with endless electrical and mechanical defects
I wouldn't even buy a JK wrangler because of the nutless wonder they call the "pentastar motor"
Jeep's lineup is pretty much luxury SUV's or econoboxes with endless electrical and mechanical defects
I wouldn't even buy a JK wrangler because of the nutless wonder they call the "pentastar motor"
CF Veteran
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 6
From: Hudson, FL
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Inline 6
The 3.6L Pentastar is a pretty darn good motor. The 3.8L (not by Pentastar) is the one that had all the problems. 3.6L had some head issues early on in mid-2012, but Chrysler has pretty much fixed all that with free replacements that have an improved and modified design. No new motors seem to have the same problem. They tick a little, but that's apparently how they're supposed to operate.
I have been enjoying my JK Rubicon.
Miss my XJ, but there's so much more to cars today that sometimes I wonder why I didn't jump the gun sooner.
I have been enjoying my JK Rubicon.
Miss my XJ, but there's so much more to cars today that sometimes I wonder why I didn't jump the gun sooner.
Last edited by thatXJguy; Jul 15, 2016 at 09:41 PM.
CF Veteran
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 12,367
Likes: 23
From: Oroville, CA
Year: 1995
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 with all of the noise and clatter
Yeah, because 285 horsepower and 260 something in torque is pretty nutless.
CF Veteran
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 6
From: Hudson, FL
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Inline 6
From Pentastar's website, 90% of the engine's torque is available starting at 1,800 RPM, and it fluctuates all the way through to 6,000 RPM. 1,800 isn't bad. 4.0L makes its max torque at around 3,200 RPM according to Google. It takes about 1,100-1,500 RPM in a 4.0L to make 90% of its torque, which isn't far behind the 1,800. Yes, it's a noticeable difference though.
It is a completely different engine than the 4.0L and has the ability to be either a roadster engine or an off-road engine. One thing I've been enjoying a lot more than the Cherokee I had is driveability. The 4.0L's tiny horsepower always left me in everyone's dust.
The 285-305 hp that comes with the Pentastar (depending on the vehicle) gets me up and going and you can continue to feel the push up to and above 70 miles per hour on the highway, which is something that the 4.0L never had. That was pretty much the top of my 4.0L's power band with 33s, and my JKr has 32.8s from the factory (they're metric).
I went on a trail ONCE with my JK. No it wasn't Moab and I'm hesitant to break anything right now because it's under loan. It creeped over everything. I gave it a little bit of gas here and there when something was in the way, but it never hesitated. For the record, my XJ on the very same trail would need some gas on some of the same obstacles as well. It never just idled over anything.
I have a Rubicon so I don't want to get into the offroad aspect of things. It basically has factory switches you can toggle to make it from point A to point B in one piece no matter the obstacle. I never had to use any of those switches yet (in fact, I really should have tested them before buying a used car) but we're talking about motor here.
Last edited by thatXJguy; Jul 16, 2016 at 04:11 PM.
CF Veteran
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 12,367
Likes: 23
From: Oroville, CA
Year: 1995
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 with all of the noise and clatter
JKs weigh about 4000-5000 pounds depending on stock or aftermarket equipment. From Pentastar's website, 90% of the engine's torque is available starting at 1,800 RPM, and it fluctuates all the way through to 6,000 RPM. 1,800 isn't bad. 4.0L makes its max torque at around 3,200 RPM according to Google. It takes about 1,100-1,500 RPM in a 4.0L to make 90% of its torque, which isn't far behind the 1,800. Yes, it's a noticeable difference though. It is a completely different engine than the 4.0L and has the ability to be either a roadster engine or an off-road engine. One thing I've been enjoying a lot more than the Cherokee I had is driveability. The 4.0L's tiny horsepower always left me in everyone's dust. The 305 hp that comes with the Pentastar gets me up and going and you can continue to feel the push up to and above 70 miles per hour on the highway, which is something that the 4.0L never had. That was pretty much the top of my 4.0L's power band with 33s, and my JKr has 32.8s from the factory (they're metric). I went on a trail ONCE with my JK. No it wasn't Moab and I'm hesitant to break anything right now because it's under loan. It creeped over everything. I gave it a little bit of gas here and there when something was in the way, but it never hesitated. For the record, my XJ on the very same trail would need some gas on some of the same obstacles as well. It never just idled over anything. I have a Rubicon so I don't want to get into the offroad aspect of things. It basically has factory switches you can toggle to make it from point A to point B in one piece no matter the obstacle. I never had to use any of those switches yet (in fact, I really should have tested them before buying a used car) but we're talking about motor here.
CF Veteran
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 6
From: Hudson, FL
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Inline 6
That's not even counting the descent control and other goodies modern tech has added...
CF Veteran
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 12,367
Likes: 23
From: Oroville, CA
Year: 1995
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 with all of the noise and clatter
You're gonna love it. Not only do you have D44 HD axles, but you should also have the 4:1 transfer case, the front and rear electric lockers, the electronic sway bar disconnect, and perhaps even 4:10 gears. That's not even counting the descent control and other goodies modern tech has added...




