Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

new cherokee?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 11:21 AM
  #16  
Tom95YJ's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,603
Likes: 3
From: SLC, Utah
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by ChadLunsford
Ugly as poop!!!!
You don't even know what it will turn out looking like with all of the camo on it
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 11:56 AM
  #17  
thatXJguy's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 6
From: Hudson, FL
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Inline 6
Default

Originally Posted by Tom95YJ
You don't even know what it will turn out looking like with all of the camo on it
color/design = unimportant

body shape = broken. FIX IT
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 12:04 PM
  #18  
Puddin''s Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Loosiana
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

They shoulda slapped the cherokee name on the Commander at least. Not that crap. I think the commander resembles old school cherokee a good bit, as far as looks goes
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 12:09 PM
  #19  
SaraJo's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Shepherdsville, KY
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Yuck! If they start making Cherokee again, I'm sure it would be a BIG hit but i think Jeep should keep it along the lines of the same body style.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 02:35 PM
  #20  
snopro700's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
From: New Haven, CT
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by SaraJo
Yuck! If they start making Cherokee again, I'm sure it would be a BIG hit but i think Jeep should keep it along the lines of the same body style.
Thy already tries with the patriot, it really was the modern XJ as far as looks. But still didnt have anything on the XJ as far as power, capability, or ruggedness.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 03:48 PM
  #21  
thatXJguy's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 6
From: Hudson, FL
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Inline 6
Default

Originally Posted by snopro700
Thy already tries with the patriot, it really was the modern XJ as far as looks. But still didnt have anything on the XJ as far as power, capability, or ruggedness.
And now the Cherokee is just a punch buggy.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 04:10 PM
  #22  
XJGrason's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 3
From: Fountain Inn, SC
Year: 1988
Model: Comanche (MJ)
Engine: I6 4.0L
Default

if this is true, if people ask what i drive, ill have to say the real jeep cherokee not that new pos "jeep" if it even can be called that, down right disrespectful.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 07:36 PM
  #23  
ChadLunsford's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Default

Lol just say Jeep XJ cuz it'll confuz people now and in the future
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2013 | 11:28 PM
  #24  
stormitecture's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
From: Tampa, FL & DC/MD infrequently
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
Default

Why is everyone thinking that this is bad. It is a great car for 90% of the people who like Jeep in STOCK form. Sure...you, me, and most on this site may not like it...but does anyone actually think Jeep should be making new XJs. That is a JOKE.

It is 2013...and there is no reason to expect anything but this. Fuel efficiency, crash safety, interior comfort is the priority. If you need an off-road rig...there are still THOUSANDS of XJs, Wranglers, Yoda's, ZUKs, etc. out there.

I like it. Looks slick and cool, and at least you can consider it 'refined' and take it do some classy places.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2013 | 05:27 AM
  #25  
1998xjspt's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,277
Likes: 0
From: Orlando/Winter Garden
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6
Default

what would be badass, is if jeep made the XJ again. same everything. just 2013 model. no its not fuel efficient and safety isn't like a minivan. but still. like imagine if car manufacturers made chevelles and GTOs and novas again, (for a limited time) and exactly how they looked in the past? EXACT like a clone with same motor tranny and axles, all the same. I'm sure there would be thousands of people wanting to get there hands on brand new 0 milage classic cars or even cherokees. not like the modern mustangs and challengers and cherokees, that they all remodeled. just my $.02

i think it'd be great
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2013 | 10:21 AM
  #26  
jeepfreak28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 195
Likes: 1
From: Bridgeport, tx
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 High Output
Default

Originally Posted by Puddin'
They shoulda slapped the cherokee name on the Commander at least. Not that crap. I think the commander resembles old school cherokee a good bit, as far as looks goes
I was thinking the exact same thing, this new thing looks more like an older grand cherokee than an XJ
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2013 | 02:53 PM
  #27  
cherokee_mud_digger's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: bellingham wa
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by 1998xjspt
what would be badass, is if jeep made the XJ again. same everything. just 2013 model. no its not fuel efficient and safety isn't like a minivan. but still. like imagine if car manufacturers made chevelles and GTOs and novas again, (for a limited time) and exactly how they looked in the past? EXACT like a clone with same motor tranny and axles, all the same. I'm sure there would be thousands of people wanting to get there hands on brand new 0 milage classic cars or even cherokees. not like the modern mustangs and challengers and cherokees, that they all remodeled. just my $.02

i think it'd be great
this!
this would be amazing for manufacturers, and even for only one year, just made the old school original everything again, they would make SOOOO much money they wouldnt know what to do with it! i am no smart person in this area, but i think it would be a great idea.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2013 | 12:01 AM
  #28  
stormitecture's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
From: Tampa, FL & DC/MD infrequently
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
Default

Everyone does understand why you will NEVER see the Cherokee name on a Jeep (in the US) again...right?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2013 | 05:35 AM
  #29  
motorcharge's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by stormitecture
Why is everyone thinking that this is bad. It is a great car for 90% of the people who like Jeep in STOCK form. Sure...you, me, and most on this site may not like it...but does anyone actually think Jeep should be making new XJs. That is a JOKE.
Yeah, it's absolutely ridiculous for us to expect us to want Jeep to stick to making what they've made for nearly 100 years. Why wouldn't we want a Jeep based off the ****ing Dodge Dart/Fiat Panda.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2013 | 10:16 AM
  #30  
Bob98Classic's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 200
Likes: 2
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by stormitecture
Everyone does understand why you will NEVER see the Cherokee name on a Jeep (in the US) again...right?
The main reason XJs are not made now, it the sales figures kept dropping
every year.

The Commanders look similar, but weight is about 4800 lb, compared to

2800 lb XJ....
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 AM.