my 2in lifted cherokee on 33's PICS

Subscribe
Oct 16, 2009 | 03:48 PM
  #1  
hey guys i finally got around to throwing my 33in claws on and putting my front bushwackers on. Well they fit perfect WITHOUT ANY RUBBING at all! As you can see in the pics all i have is a 2in spacer lift up front and 2in blocks in the back. They rims have 4.0in backspacing. The backs fit great with the stock flares. Also im gonna throw the bushwackers on the back when the rain clears up around here,cant wait to hit wharton state forest hopefully next weekend. ps the drivers flare was cut for an arb snorkel by the previous owner

     

Reply 0
Oct 16, 2009 | 03:50 PM
  #2  
heres the tire size for the hell of it.

 

Reply 0
Oct 16, 2009 | 04:33 PM
  #3  
SWEET setup man. real mean looking. post some pics up when the final flares are slapped on.. happy wheeling.
Reply 0
Oct 16, 2009 | 04:39 PM
  #4  
guess you need to buy a snorkel to make the flares look right eh? nice lookin xj man!!
Reply 0
Oct 16, 2009 | 07:08 PM
  #5  
wow! mine are 31's with 3 inch lift and stock flares and they rub on the back of front fenders when i turn sharp.
Reply 0
Oct 16, 2009 | 10:10 PM
  #6  
take it wheeling and see what happens.. let us know. i got 3.5 and i want 33s. In my expirence it seems every xj is different. i suppose it all depends on what life its had, i mean being loaded down all the time or what have you. I know vehicles settle over time by themselves just it seems some are better off than others. The ride height in my 89 is so low it looks lowered with 225 75s.
Reply 0
Oct 17, 2009 | 12:09 AM
  #7  
Nice looking ride. Flex it out. Hope there is no rubbing. That would be hope for all of us.
Reply 0
Oct 17, 2009 | 12:15 AM
  #8  
Good job! Nice ride!
Reply 0
Oct 17, 2009 | 02:14 AM
  #9  
flex pics!! lol
Reply 0
Oct 17, 2009 | 10:22 AM
  #10  
im eventually gonna throw a 4.5re lift on but for now its staying the height it is. And yes im gonna post up flex pics when the weather clears up around here,its bin cold and raining this week
Reply 0
Oct 17, 2009 | 01:26 PM
  #11  
n/m starting diff thread
Reply 0
Subscribe
Currently Active Users (1)