Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

Help me choose an XJ

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-2010, 09:43 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Triple Crown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default Help me choose an XJ

I'm looking at a 1996 4x4 with 110,000miles and new (stock) rear differential, wheels & tires and a 2000 4x4 with 65,000.

Same trim level, both look great (but the older one has freshly painted bumpers & wheel well fairings)

Both are really clean with no damage anywhere.
The asking price is $6500 for the '96 and $7500 for the 2000.

Which should I get?
Old 06-30-2010, 09:46 PM
  #2  
Seasoned Member
 
Pat Vogt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: West Haven, CT
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

That is wayyy to much money for the 96 in my opinion.

Go for the lower miles that the 2000 has, or just keep looking.
Old 06-30-2010, 09:55 PM
  #3  
CF Veteran
 
hitalonit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: St. Clair Shores, MI
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: Inline 6
Default

go for the 2000... the 96 is way overpriced... the 2000 will last you longer.. also depends on what you want to do with it....
Old 06-30-2010, 09:58 PM
  #4  
CF Veteran
 
gpXJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Grand Prairie, Texas
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO I6
Default

I got a 2000 limited with 92k miles. Only flaw was small rip in driver's leather seat and dent in front bumper. I paid $4700 for it. Negotiate on that 2k if you opt for it...definitely don't pay that for the 96.
Old 06-30-2010, 09:59 PM
  #5  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Triple Crown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Thanks.

Initially it will be a daily driver with some fire-road type mild offroading. Later I want to lift it and get bigger tires. Maybe 3" lift with 31" tires.

Planning to add accessories as I can afford them.
Old 06-30-2010, 11:41 PM
  #6  
CF Veteran
 
GreenClassic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,103
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Year: 1995
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Given the choice between those two, I'd go for the 2000. Almost half the miles.
Old 07-01-2010, 09:32 PM
  #7  
Seasoned Member
 
84zmyfavorite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Try talking the 96 owner down $5000 to $1500. Maby $2500 if its in good shape. $4000 to $5500 sounds about right for the 2000 .
Old 07-02-2010, 05:42 AM
  #8  
CF Veteran
 
91 limited owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oshkosh, WI.
Posts: 4,118
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by 84zmyfavorite
Try talking the 96 owner down $5000 to $1500. Maby $2500 if its in good shape. $4000 to $5500 sounds about right for the 2000 .
My '91 Limited with 67k on it. Only Blue Books at $2500. And that's is only because it is a Limited. So yes that '96 is way over priced.
Old 07-02-2010, 11:20 AM
  #9  
CF Veteran
 
jiffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: san bruno, ca
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 9teen98
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
Default

i'd go for the 2000 model.
Old 07-02-2010, 11:27 AM
  #10  
Seasoned Member
 
jeepkid03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Coventry, CT
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 high output, Alabama Cylinder head, 60mm bored TB
Default

See if you can talk the guy down on the 96. 2000's have the head cracking problem and that mileage on the 96 is nothing for a 4.0L. I think the 96 will have less issues. My 2000 has lots of little stuff that breaks on it. My '90 XJ with twice the miles was more reliable.
Old 07-02-2010, 11:36 AM
  #11  
CF Veteran
 
89Laredo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,280
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Year: 1996
Engine: 4.0
Default

thing to keep in mind: 2000s are known for head cracks.

Honestly, I hate the look of the 97+ cherokees.
I would talk him down on the 96, it will be better for you.
They have the body strengthening of the 97+ models, most have the stronger 8.25, OBDII (if youre into that), and my girlfriends 96 has been one of the most reliable things Ive ever seen. We take it everywhere, beat on it and it never complains. 110 is nothing, my girlfriends is close to 230.
Old 07-02-2010, 11:41 AM
  #12  
Seasoned Member
 
jeepkid03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Coventry, CT
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 high output, Alabama Cylinder head, 60mm bored TB
Default

Originally Posted by Defiance665
thing to keep in mind: 2000s are known for head cracks.

Honestly, I hate the look of the 97+ cherokees.
I would talk him down on the 96, it will be better for you.

x2. I've owned a '90 and two 2000 models. My friend has an '89 and my dad had an '87 for 15 years. The newer ones look nice, but I honestly think the older ones were built better. The newer ones seem to have a lot of little things that go wrong like the grand cherokees do, such as electrical gremlins.
Old 07-02-2010, 11:51 AM
  #13  
Seasoned Member
 
PolarXJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

'00 Model The other guy is smokn' something for that price. I paid less than that for my '95 almost ten years ago.
Old 07-02-2010, 03:40 PM
  #14  
Newbie
 
Custermustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

I just bought a 96 4X4 with 105k for $2800 1.5 months ago.
Old 07-02-2010, 03:50 PM
  #15  
CF Veteran
 
GreenClassic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,103
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Year: 1995
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by jeepkid03
x2. I've owned a '90 and two 2000 models. My friend has an '89 and my dad had an '87 for 15 years. The newer ones look nice, but I honestly think the older ones were built better. The newer ones seem to have a lot of little things that go wrong like the grand cherokees do, such as electrical gremlins.

My '99 seems built pretty well. Only major issue has been the transmission (dealer probably had it flushed, which is definitely NOT recommended).

Only minor issue is I can only roll down windows from driver's switch, but this is a common issue on pre-'97 XJs, too. Other than that I have no electrical issues. The '97-'01 are just as reliable as the pre-'97. The heads on the '00-'01 are known to be a little weaker, but you can always replace it with one from another year.

Last edited by GreenClassic; 07-02-2010 at 03:58 PM.


Quick Reply: Help me choose an XJ



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 AM.