Pacific Northwest Washington, Oregon, Alaska

3 inch lift question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 13, 2015 | 11:46 AM
  #1  
Xjbrett06's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default 3 inch lift question

I've searched the forum and have not found an answer too my question. I'm in he market for a 3" lift and am looking at the rough country kit. The question I have is one kit has control arms and one doesn't. What is the need for the new control arms n is that the kit I should get or are the control arms not necessary. Thanks for any help
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2015 | 07:43 AM
  #2  
MoparNJeep's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 5
From: Puyallup wa
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.5L Stroker
Default

Control arms are not necessary at 3" of lift. They are nice to have for extra strength and lil extra tire clearance when turning with wide tires. If you only want 3" lift you can build a better lift by buying parts separately.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2015 | 11:32 PM
  #3  
wanagojeep's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
From: Oly, washington
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 str. 6
Default

Agreed. I wouldn't worry about arms with a 3" lift. If you ever plan on going bigger down the road. I'd recommend looking into adjustable arms
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2015 | 09:15 PM
  #4  
odgreen's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 15,581
Likes: 8
From: some small town oregon
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Well I'm going to go a different direction here and recommend the one with arms. It will ride 1000x better with aftermarket arms and have a tad bit more suspension movement.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 01:01 AM
  #5  
Jesus M's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Pacific NW
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

I had the RC 3" lift with the 1071 control arms and 2.2 shocks. I added a 1" spacer in front and made some shackle relocators so my lift was then at 4". At 4" the Jeep rode, steered and handled better that it did at 3".

I think this was for two reasons:
1. 2.2 shocks did not have much uptravel at 3" and so would bottom on the bump stops. At 4" there was enough uptravel for the suspension to work without bottoming.

2. The 1071 control arms are sized to provide proper caster for 3"-4.5" lift. I think at 3" they are a bit too long, but at 4" the caster is more in line with where it needs to be to yield good directional stability.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 09:30 AM
  #6  
afriberg's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by odgreen
Well I'm going to go a different direction here and recommend the one with arms. It will ride 1000x better with aftermarket arms and have a tad bit more suspension movement.
Not sure if you've already ordered or not...but I agree with odgreen...plus you'll have the added strength over the stamped steel control arms.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2016 | 03:14 PM
  #7  
Jrozar's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 820
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

I have a 2" lift and added a set of metalcloak duroflex upper and lower control arms, the reasoning is the 20 degree flex and self centering capability compared to a stock or typical clevite arms 5 degree of flex. I also added a Currie track bar with the Johnny joint on one end, disconnects, extended brake lines and performs very well.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bowlzi21
Modified XJ Cherokee Tech
21
Dec 15, 2020 08:35 PM
mannyXJ
Cherokee Chat
11
Dec 14, 2015 05:13 PM
jedijeb
Modified XJ Cherokee Tech
7
Dec 13, 2015 03:20 PM
Ibison
Stock Grand Cherokee Tech. All ZJ/WJ/WK Non-modified/stock questions go here!
1
Dec 6, 2015 02:44 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 PM.