Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here XJ (84-01)
All OEM related XJ specific tech. Examples, no start, general maintenance or anything that's stock.

Which XJ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2015 | 11:52 AM
  #16  
BrawnyDog's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 641
Likes: 1
From: Anderson, SC
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by jeepkid03
I prefer the pre-97s. The interior on the 97+ is way too cheap and creaky. With that said, finding one with the least amount of rust is a higher priority than anything, which is why I have a 2000.
Can confirm. My interior makes all kinds of noise
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2015 | 05:58 PM
  #17  
MOOSE 843's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Mudville SC
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Sorry guys, been down with my back for the last couple of days. Anyway, Mine is a 99 XJ, 2wd. I just remember I heard somewhere (another site maybe) that the best XJ's were the 97-99, but I don't remember why. I just wanted to make sure that I didn't get one that had a bunch of problems or something that I would be continually working on.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2015 | 06:05 PM
  #18  
JPXJMOAB's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 7
From: Minnesota
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

I've heard the 97 was a wiring nightmare ..
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2015 | 06:13 PM
  #19  
Orlo's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 360
Likes: 5
Model: Cherokee
Default

I've had my 98 for 6 years. It requires $300 in repairs annually to keep it functioning perfectly. Not bad for 16 years old. Other than an O2 sensor, the emissions systems have been trouble free. No problems with annual inspections and the rig drives nicely. It seems to follow the experiences that most report for the 97-99 year Cherokees. Very reliable with modern safety and convenience systems. Hard to go wrong with one from those 3 years.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2015 | 08:41 PM
  #20  
Boosted's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

I asked myself this same question and after hours of research and reading, I decided to get my 98. I was hoping to find a 99 only because it is technically a year newer but basically the same.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2015 | 09:36 PM
  #21  
BrawnyDog's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 641
Likes: 1
From: Anderson, SC
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by MOOSE 843
Sorry guys, been down with my back for the last couple of days. Anyway, Mine is a 99 XJ, 2wd. I just remember I heard somewhere (another site maybe) that the best XJ's were the 97-99, but I don't remember why. I just wanted to make sure that I didn't get one that had a bunch of problems or something that I would be continually working on.
Uh, you might want to get another vehicle
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2015 | 10:03 PM
  #22  
forcefed44's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 18
Likes: 1
From: north NJ or Easter shore VA
Year: 95
Model: Cherokee
Default

Mine is a '95 4.0 4 Door base with auto 1 owner with 122K. My friend has a 98 and has nothing but problems.. Mine is just a bit "hot" running atm..
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2015 | 10:32 PM
  #23  
1994's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.5L(300k+)
Default

Mine's a 94 SE with the 2.5L amc engine. 4x4, ax5 transmission. 303k miles never used a tire unevenly or had brake shimmy. Never any serious issues other than a starter, alternator, radiator, water pump. I'm just now replacing worn suspension components.

Still gets me 400 miles to a tank of gas and doesn't use up any kinds of fluids.

I decided to inspect the pushrods at 300k - suspecting they may have been warped from all the wear. I took two out ... one from the front and the one second from the back. They were as straight as the day they were originally installed.

Biggest problem? The drivers door(2 door). The factory weld broke loose from the upper mount and no one .. I mean no one has ever been able to get it back right. The last guy to try gooped it up with mig pretty bad and wound up burning through the door.

She's beautiful though.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2015 | 09:18 PM
  #24  
JamromXJ's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: The Isle of Long, in happy and sunny New York.
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: Supercharged 440 Magnum punched .60 - yeah right.. 4.0 like everyone else.
Default

Originally Posted by JeepMN
Not to say you're wrong or anything but are you sure they started making the 0331 head in 99? I thought all XJ's without a coilpack came with the 0630 head? I'm guessing there might be a few but I have personally never seen a 99 with a coil pack so I'm just curious.
They're out there, few and far between. I ran into one at the JY. Thought it was a 2000 until I looked at the door plate. Production was 99, NY reg was 1999 and it had a 0331 head... as per the forge number on the head.

Not sure why, but they used that head in that year.

Read it a a few times on this forum as well... and it's also on the list in that video from Bleepin' Jeep. '99 - cracked head.

Again... it's not the primary head for '99. Like I said, the best policy is to have a LOOK at what you're buying... which means open the hood, scrape the crud and read the numbers.

JR.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2015 | 09:26 PM
  #25  
BrawnyDog's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 641
Likes: 1
From: Anderson, SC
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by JamromXJ
They're out there, few and far between. I ran into one at the JY. Thought it was a 2000 until I looked at the door plate. Production was 99, NY reg was 1999 and it had a 0331 head... as per the forge number on the head.

Not sure why, but they used that head in that year.

Read it a a few times on this forum as well... and it's also on the list in that video from Bleepin' Jeep. '99 - cracked head.

Again... it's not the primary head for '99. Like I said, the best policy is to have a LOOK at what you're buying... which means open the hood, scrape the crud and read the numbers.

JR.
The confusion might be in that production numbers don't always reflect model year. For example mine is a 99 but the production date was in late 98.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2015 | 09:32 PM
  #26  
JamromXJ's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: The Isle of Long, in happy and sunny New York.
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: Supercharged 440 Magnum punched .60 - yeah right.. 4.0 like everyone else.
Default

I agree. I knew what I was after when I bought my XJ but I still checked. I pissed off the previous owner because I took so long and really ripped it apart looking and checking data plates.

I'm just passing along the point that the year should not be the only reason to buy a model.

Best to always look at things. You never know what you really have until you own it.

JR
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2015 | 10:04 AM
  #27  
MOOSE 843's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Mudville SC
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by BrawnyDog
Uh, you might want to get another vehicle
Not what I meant. So far I have changed the oil, repaired a broken rear shock mount,(the other has already been repaired) I have a noise that I'm not sure if its the ac compressor or the electric fan, I need to change the front shocks, install the new tires and rims, and do a brake job. All of that is normal wear & tear routine maintenance. What I mean is that I don't want to be replacing lifters, rods, springs, piston rings, heads, etc, because there was some dysfunction in them for that year model. I love working on maintaining or modifying the vehicles, I just don't want to keep replacing the same parts because of a problem. Like my Ford truck that is on its 3rd water pump in 2 years.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2015 | 12:10 PM
  #28  
Fred/N0AZZ's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 17
From: Monett, MO.
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by JamromXJ
I agree. I knew what I was after when I bought my XJ but I still checked. I pissed off the previous owner because I took so long and really ripped it apart looking and checking data plates.

I'm just passing along the point that the year should not be the only reason to buy a model.

Best to always look at things. You never know what you really have until you own it.

JR

Any of the searches will tell you they changed to it in mid 99, I have posted that many times here before.


The 97-99's were the best year's IMHO, with the early 99's being the best of both worlds before they went downhill. In the 00-01's with the head and the LPD30 instead of the HP's plus all the extra sensor's for emissions and no dist. There were other things changed that made them less desirable IMO and why I searched for almost 7 mo. before I found a 99 that I liked for the price I wanted to pay.


But it ends up with what you can find and what kind of work you can do or parts that need to be changed like on the 00/01 models. After all these are old SUV's and will require some work and $$$$ heavy on the $$$$ part
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:36 AM.