What year Cherokee to purchase?
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 842
Likes: 4
From: Everett, WA
Year: 1996
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 5.2L
Pre 90s
-Possibly a D44 if you find the right one
-Wagoneer option(if you like them)
-Limited engine mods
-vacuum front disconnect (depends if you like it or not, I personally do)
-Renix engine (non HO)
91-95
-OBD1
-older body style
-parts easy to get for
-Non disconnect front axle
-HO engine
-older style interior
96 (TRANSITION YEAR)
Pros
-OBD2
-Older style body (again if you like it)
-New interior style
-HO engine
-Non disconnect front axle
97-99
-OBD2
-Newer body style
-HO engine
-non disconnect front axle
-new interior
-metal hatch
00-01
-OBD2
-electronic ignition (pack non Dizzy)
-0331 cylinder head (prone to cracking)
-Newer style body
-newer interior
-non disconnect front axle
-HO engine
-Possibly a D44 if you find the right one
-Wagoneer option(if you like them)
-Limited engine mods
-vacuum front disconnect (depends if you like it or not, I personally do)
-Renix engine (non HO)
91-95
-OBD1
-older body style
-parts easy to get for
-Non disconnect front axle
-HO engine
-older style interior
96 (TRANSITION YEAR)
Pros
-OBD2
-Older style body (again if you like it)
-New interior style
-HO engine
-Non disconnect front axle
97-99
-OBD2
-Newer body style
-HO engine
-non disconnect front axle
-new interior
-metal hatch
00-01
-OBD2
-electronic ignition (pack non Dizzy)
-0331 cylinder head (prone to cracking)
-Newer style body
-newer interior
-non disconnect front axle
-HO engine
96 still have the old interior
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 1
From: NC/SC
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Pre 90s
-Possibly a D44 if you find the right one
-Wagoneer option(if you like them)
-Limited engine mods
-vacuum front disconnect (depends if you like it or not, I personally do)
-Renix engine (non HO)
91-95
-OBD1
-older body style
-parts easy to get for
-Non disconnect front axle
-HO engine
-older style interior
96 (TRANSITION YEAR)
-OBD2
-Older style body (again if you like it)
-old interior style
-HO engine
-Non disconnect front axle
97-99
-OBD2
-Newer body style
-HO engine
-non disconnect front axle
-new interior
-metal hatch
00-01
-OBD2
-electronic ignition (pack non Dizzy)
-0331 cylinder head (prone to cracking)
-Newer style body
-newer interior
-non disconnect front axle
-HO engine
-Possibly a D44 if you find the right one
-Wagoneer option(if you like them)
-Limited engine mods
-vacuum front disconnect (depends if you like it or not, I personally do)
-Renix engine (non HO)
91-95
-OBD1
-older body style
-parts easy to get for
-Non disconnect front axle
-HO engine
-older style interior
96 (TRANSITION YEAR)
-OBD2
-Older style body (again if you like it)
-old interior style
-HO engine
-Non disconnect front axle
97-99
-OBD2
-Newer body style
-HO engine
-non disconnect front axle
-new interior
-metal hatch
00-01
-OBD2
-electronic ignition (pack non Dizzy)
-0331 cylinder head (prone to cracking)
-Newer style body
-newer interior
-non disconnect front axle
-HO engine
Renixs can take any mod that the new High outputs can. Only difference is Renix can't get the PMC modules..those Jet performance chips that aren't worth anything, and we can use a HO header, but we have to deal with EGR.
My vote goes for the Renix, its simple to work on, and upgraded very easily because they made things better as they went on, but they got hard mechaniclly to work on.
My buddies got a 96, older body but new interior, whole interior is the new style, so some 96s did get the better interior. But he has stricter emmision standars and everytime its smogged he has something wrong. Mine is a 88 and passes fine. Renixs have less to go wrong mechanically and are easy to fix & figure out when something does go wrong which is why they get my vote.
Get a 89-90 though so you have th echance of a ax-15 and c101 connector
Jus curious,I was seriously considering the jet performance module but I'm reading more and more there junk.. ? Any mixed opinions? And at Ian,why do u prefer the steel hatch? I thought I was saving sum weight when I got the fiberglass on my 95
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
From: pennsylvania
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Originally Posted by 95xj4.0ho
Jus curious,I was seriously considering the jet performance module but I'm reading more and more there junk.. ? Any mixed opinions? And at Ian,why do u prefer the steel hatch? I thought I was saving sum weight when I got the fiberglass on my 95
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Year: 1987
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
My 87 is the best I've had. I love it. I had a 93 that had a bunch of electrical issues and a 96 that I had to replace too many things. My 87 hasn't failed me yet.
CF Veteran
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 3
From: Tampa Fl
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
97, 98, or 99. HO 4.0, doesent have the 0331head that is prone to cracking, if it has a c8.25 rear axle it will be 29 splne, not 26, has airbags, high pinion d30. Theres more but i cant think of it right now
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Exactly the reason! I've seen stress cracks develop on other vehicles from being slammed shut over the years. Mind you, never on a Jeep, but there's a chance, I guess. I guess that's another reason why it'd be best to stiffen up the uniframe for our model years, too...



