maximizing 4.0 engine output
alright well it seems like I have some a few solid directions to possibly take. I'm leaning towards just doing the injectors though.
The Header I bought is a Gibson GP400. its made of 14 gauge 1.5" tubing. I just got the chrome plated version.
My wife has just informed me that her mom is giving me her '92 xj to do with what I want. And to take that one step further my wife is encouraging me to do a full build on it. soooo... I believe I will be saving some cash for this upcoming project. My plans so far involve..
- GM 350 Small Block engine conversion with a 700R-4 transmission
- Long Arm Suspension Lift (around 8.5" is the goal)
- 35" Swamper Tires
- Some custom fab body parts (fender flares, rocker guards, bumpers, etc..)
The best part about this whole thing is the wife in encouraging it despite the anticipated thousands of $ it will cost. I'll be sure to document the whole process and I'm sure I will be on here with several questions along the way.
The Header I bought is a Gibson GP400. its made of 14 gauge 1.5" tubing. I just got the chrome plated version.
My wife has just informed me that her mom is giving me her '92 xj to do with what I want. And to take that one step further my wife is encouraging me to do a full build on it. soooo... I believe I will be saving some cash for this upcoming project. My plans so far involve..
- GM 350 Small Block engine conversion with a 700R-4 transmission
- Long Arm Suspension Lift (around 8.5" is the goal)
- 35" Swamper Tires
- Some custom fab body parts (fender flares, rocker guards, bumpers, etc..)
The best part about this whole thing is the wife in encouraging it despite the anticipated thousands of $ it will cost. I'll be sure to document the whole process and I'm sure I will be on here with several questions along the way.
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Seabrook, New Hampshire
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
When I owned a 300zx, I remember there being a consensus in support of smooth polished exhaust port (headers also provide about 24hp on those cars), and the equivalent of 80 grit for the finish on the intake. The theory seems to be that the rougher surface prevents the air from "sticking" to the walls.
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Coquitlam, B.C.
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 812
Likes: 1
From: Eugene, OR
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.7 Stroker I6
Seasoned Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 358
Likes: 3
From: Illinois
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
I would recommend just giving the '99 a tune up with quality cap, rotor, wires and plugs. Make sure you have clean fluids and filters in the Jeep and call it good.
I don't think the 703's are the right injectors for a '99. I installed 784's in my '99 and while it seems to have helped with smoother idle and a little better throttle response, it didn't make any improvements in fuel economy or overall performance, that I can tell.
I don't think the 703's are the right injectors for a '99. I installed 784's in my '99 and while it seems to have helped with smoother idle and a little better throttle response, it didn't make any improvements in fuel economy or overall performance, that I can tell.
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: South Georgia
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
i warped my head and took it to a shop and macon and they shaved it down and port and polished my head for 50 bucks. i think thats a good deal
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
From: Slaughter, LA
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
For those of you new to this, the pictures below show the head intake & Exhuast valve chamber before and after it`s been ported. The other is what your Manifold exhuast may look like and what it looks like after having it polished.
I`m sure you can understand how that ruff surface would restrict the air flow.
I borrowed these pic`s from here: http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/vi....php?f=8&t=317
I`m sure you can understand how that ruff surface would restrict the air flow.
I borrowed these pic`s from here: http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/vi....php?f=8&t=317
Would you calculate the reduction in compression ratio that results from removing that much material from the combustion chamber in the head? How would you get it back?
Would you take into account the reduction in air velocity through the intake manifold and consider that you could possibly reduce the combustion efficiency by opening up the ports that much?
Seasoned Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 358
Likes: 3
From: Illinois
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Thank you for saying this!!! 703's WILL NOT WORK in a 99. You have to use Chrysler 784's or Ford 789's. Either work, I prefer the 784's. They can be found in a 97-01 Stratus/Breeze/Neon with the 2.4. You will not see a MPG increase, but you will get better throttle response and a smoother idle. After you do the swap make sure to reset your ecu. Otherwise you'll run rich. If you want to know how to do it, go here.
The concensus of opinion was that the computer reset was optional. The computer constantly changes settings anyway based on sensor inputs. The reset would cause the computer to revert to factory preset parameters which may or may not be closer to where the computer wants to be with the different injectors.
I have noticed a steady improvement in fuel economy since I installed the 784's. When I first installed them, I was getting about 16mpg mixed city and highway and the last fill-up was closer to 18mpg. I have also installed a new pre-cat O2 since then, which might help with fuel mileage.
I did not reset my computer, but I did notice that right after installing the 784's, my vehicle did run rich. I consulted with several very knowledgable technicians about dumping the adaptive memory, which is what resetting does.
The concensus of opinion was that the computer reset was optional. The computer constantly changes settings anyway based on sensor inputs. The reset would cause the computer to revert to factory preset parameters which may or may not be closer to where the computer wants to be with the different injectors.
I have noticed a steady improvement in fuel economy since I installed the 784's. When I first installed them, I was getting about 16mpg mixed city and highway and the last fill-up was closer to 18mpg. I have also installed a new pre-cat O2 since then, which might help with fuel mileage.
The concensus of opinion was that the computer reset was optional. The computer constantly changes settings anyway based on sensor inputs. The reset would cause the computer to revert to factory preset parameters which may or may not be closer to where the computer wants to be with the different injectors.
I have noticed a steady improvement in fuel economy since I installed the 784's. When I first installed them, I was getting about 16mpg mixed city and highway and the last fill-up was closer to 18mpg. I have also installed a new pre-cat O2 since then, which might help with fuel mileage.


