Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here XJ (84-01)
All OEM related XJ specific tech. Examples, no start, general maintenance or anything that's stock.

Cat-back Exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 05:03 PM
  #1  
zman32006's Avatar
Thread Starter
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: 30907
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6 EFI "Power Tech"
Question Cat-back Exhaust

I hear of people putting cat-back exhausts on there jeeps. I have a 1990 Jeep Cherokee. I can get a deal on a Dynomax Cat-back 2-1/2" diameter cat-back with a turbo muffler. should I go for it? or is it not worth it? because wouldnt jeep have designed the jeeps with a 2-1/2" diameter pipe out of the cat if it was more efficient?
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 05:17 PM
  #2  
Ian96XJ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

Many times, car designers will build a car on how cheap they can do it rather than for performance. As long as the 2.5" pipes are from the cat back, you're okay.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 05:23 PM
  #3  
X1994J's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,535
Likes: 0
From: Eagle Mountain, Utah
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

I dont know how much difference it would make considering you've still got the stock puny stuff coming off the manifold. Might make a little difference, but I wouldnt think too much.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 05:36 PM
  #4  
zman32006's Avatar
Thread Starter
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: 30907
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6 EFI "Power Tech"
Default

Originally Posted by X1994J
I dont know how much difference it would make considering you've still got the stock puny stuff coming off the manifold. Might make a little difference, but I wouldnt think too much.
I've heard it makes a good amount of difference because it reduces the back pressure. Doesnt it have a 2-1/2" pipe going from the manifold to the cat? Then it goes to a smaller pipe out of the cat? Thats what I think is goin on I havent really looked yet its been rainy and cold here.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 05:45 PM
  #5  
Ian96XJ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

I read somewhere that there needs to be a certain amount of back pressure for the engine to work right and that maintaining the stock size from the manifold to the cat will do that. I think you can upgrade to 2.5" all throughout, but I think you'll need to retune after that.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 07:52 PM
  #6  
Turbo X_J's Avatar
CF Veteran
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 8,567
Likes: 20
From: ☼ Blackhole Sun
Year: My Jeep is a GMC
Default

I think it all depends on the application. If you just go to a larger diameter pipe you'll lose scavenging & volumetric efficiency. In other words the exhaust pulse traveling down the pipe causes a negative pressure which helps to clear the next cylinder when that exhaust valve opens. If you increase rpms or CI with the same diameter pipe that will cause a bottle neck. If you just uncork the exhaust on a stock motor when you stab the gas pedal, it's like stepping on a wet sponge.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 08:26 PM
  #7  
85on32+4's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Year: 1985
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.5 liter
Default

Originally Posted by Turbo X_J
I think it all depends on the application. If you just go to a larger diameter pipe you'll lose scavenging & volumetric efficiency. In other words the exhaust pulse traveling down the pipe causes a negative pressure which helps to clear the next cylinder when that exhaust valve opens. If you increase rpms or CI with the same diameter pipe that will cause a bottle neck. If you just uncork the exhaust on a stock motor when you stab the gas pedal, it's like stepping on a wet sponge.
x2
nicely worded
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 08:33 PM
  #8  
shepW00dD's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Poconos PA
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

confusingly worded im doin the same thing what are you talkin about?
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2009 | 08:51 PM
  #9  
PDubs's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Glen Burnie, MD
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.8
Default

I have the dynomax cat-back system on my 2.8. Not sure if it makes a difference over stock or not cause my whole system was rusted out when I bought it, so obviously I noticed a HUGE difference. It sounds pretty sweet on my Jeep so it probably sounds a lot better with a 4.0 in front of it.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 01:40 PM
  #10  
jeepkid03's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 273
Likes: 1
From: Coventry, CT
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 high output, Alabama Cylinder head, 60mm bored TB
Default

Originally Posted by Turbo X_J
I think it all depends on the application. If you just go to a larger diameter pipe you'll lose scavenging & volumetric efficiency. In other words the exhaust pulse traveling down the pipe causes a negative pressure which helps to clear the next cylinder when that exhaust valve opens. If you increase rpms or CI with the same diameter pipe that will cause a bottle neck. If you just uncork the exhaust on a stock motor when you stab the gas pedal, it's like stepping on a wet sponge.
you have a point but unless he chops off his exhaust and runs straight headers or a 3" pipe, there won't be much of a difference. As long as the OP has a cat, muffler, and nothing bigger than 2.5" pipe he should be fine and have enough backpressure. Many XJ owners have upgraded to a highflow cat and performance muffler with 2.5" piping the whole way through, and have seen gains in MPG as well as a little more power.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 06:23 PM
  #11  
tablerockfshr's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Dynomax made my 99xj run a lot stronger, if I was you I would do it
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 09:32 AM
  #12  
zman32006's Avatar
Thread Starter
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: 30907
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6 EFI "Power Tech"
Default

Originally Posted by Turbo X_J
I think it all depends on the application. If you just go to a larger diameter pipe you'll lose scavenging & volumetric efficiency. In other words the exhaust pulse traveling down the pipe causes a negative pressure which helps to clear the next cylinder when that exhaust valve opens. If you increase rpms or CI with the same diameter pipe that will cause a bottle neck. If you just uncork the exhaust on a stock motor when you stab the gas pedal, it's like stepping on a wet sponge.
So are you saying its good to upgrade to the cat-back? I got lost when you said its like stepping on a wet sponge. Is that going to be good or bad?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 10:46 AM
  #13  
kilbrethj's Avatar
Registered Users
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0l
Default

i put a 2.5" hi flow cat with 2.5" pipe to a new flowmaster knock off muffler and then a 2.5" tail pipe. put new O2 sensors in and gained about 2 mpg. Did a complete tuneup after that and gained like another 2 mpg. i went from about 13mpg to 18 with all that. then i put a lift and bigger tires on and it dropped back down to like 15 or 16. the exhaust didn't give me a ton of power but it definately helped. plus its one of them supporting mods so once i starting playing with the motor the exhaust is taking care of!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jmsummers2012
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
56
Jun 12, 2025 02:04 AM
libengan
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
14
Nov 6, 2015 09:16 AM
MightyMouse8
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
14
Oct 8, 2015 08:57 AM
Crimmy
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
8
Oct 1, 2015 06:43 PM
shadowmoses
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
6
Sep 30, 2015 01:34 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:35 PM.