Cat-back Exhaust
Thread Starter
Seasoned Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: 30907
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6 EFI "Power Tech"
I hear of people putting cat-back exhausts on there jeeps. I have a 1990 Jeep Cherokee. I can get a deal on a Dynomax Cat-back 2-1/2" diameter cat-back with a turbo muffler. should I go for it? or is it not worth it? because wouldnt jeep have designed the jeeps with a 2-1/2" diameter pipe out of the cat if it was more efficient?
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Many times, car designers will build a car on how cheap they can do it rather than for performance. As long as the 2.5" pipes are from the cat back, you're okay.
CF Veteran
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,535
Likes: 0
From: Eagle Mountain, Utah
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
I dont know how much difference it would make considering you've still got the stock puny stuff coming off the manifold. Might make a little difference, but I wouldnt think too much.
Thread Starter
Seasoned Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: 30907
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6 EFI "Power Tech"
I've heard it makes a good amount of difference because it reduces the back pressure. Doesnt it have a 2-1/2" pipe going from the manifold to the cat? Then it goes to a smaller pipe out of the cat? Thats what I think is goin on I havent really looked yet its been rainy and cold here.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
I read somewhere that there needs to be a certain amount of back pressure for the engine to work right and that maintaining the stock size from the manifold to the cat will do that. I think you can upgrade to 2.5" all throughout, but I think you'll need to retune after that.
I think it all depends on the application. If you just go to a larger diameter pipe you'll lose scavenging & volumetric efficiency. In other words the exhaust pulse traveling down the pipe causes a negative pressure which helps to clear the next cylinder when that exhaust valve opens. If you increase rpms or CI with the same diameter pipe that will cause a bottle neck. If you just uncork the exhaust on a stock motor when you stab the gas pedal, it's like stepping on a wet sponge.
I think it all depends on the application. If you just go to a larger diameter pipe you'll lose scavenging & volumetric efficiency. In other words the exhaust pulse traveling down the pipe causes a negative pressure which helps to clear the next cylinder when that exhaust valve opens. If you increase rpms or CI with the same diameter pipe that will cause a bottle neck. If you just uncork the exhaust on a stock motor when you stab the gas pedal, it's like stepping on a wet sponge.
nicely worded
Trending Topics
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Glen Burnie, MD
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.8
I have the dynomax cat-back system on my 2.8. Not sure if it makes a difference over stock or not cause my whole system was rusted out when I bought it, so obviously I noticed a HUGE difference. It sounds pretty sweet on my Jeep so it probably sounds a lot better with a 4.0 in front of it.
Seasoned Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 273
Likes: 1
From: Coventry, CT
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 high output, Alabama Cylinder head, 60mm bored TB
I think it all depends on the application. If you just go to a larger diameter pipe you'll lose scavenging & volumetric efficiency. In other words the exhaust pulse traveling down the pipe causes a negative pressure which helps to clear the next cylinder when that exhaust valve opens. If you increase rpms or CI with the same diameter pipe that will cause a bottle neck. If you just uncork the exhaust on a stock motor when you stab the gas pedal, it's like stepping on a wet sponge.
Thread Starter
Seasoned Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: 30907
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6 EFI "Power Tech"
I think it all depends on the application. If you just go to a larger diameter pipe you'll lose scavenging & volumetric efficiency. In other words the exhaust pulse traveling down the pipe causes a negative pressure which helps to clear the next cylinder when that exhaust valve opens. If you increase rpms or CI with the same diameter pipe that will cause a bottle neck. If you just uncork the exhaust on a stock motor when you stab the gas pedal, it's like stepping on a wet sponge.
i put a 2.5" hi flow cat with 2.5" pipe to a new flowmaster knock off muffler and then a 2.5" tail pipe. put new O2 sensors in and gained about 2 mpg. Did a complete tuneup after that and gained like another 2 mpg. i went from about 13mpg to 18 with all that. then i put a lift and bigger tires on and it dropped back down to like 15 or 16. the exhaust didn't give me a ton of power but it definately helped. plus its one of them supporting mods so once i starting playing with the motor the exhaust is taking care of!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jmsummers2012
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
56
Jun 12, 2025 02:04 AM
libengan
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
14
Nov 6, 2015 09:16 AM
MightyMouse8
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
14
Oct 8, 2015 08:57 AM
Crimmy
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
8
Oct 1, 2015 06:43 PM
shadowmoses
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
6
Sep 30, 2015 01:34 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)




