Axle nut anti-seize
Interesting
I just emailed them asking for a complete explanation.
I also emailed a friend, who is an engineer here at USC.
We shall, get a explanation one way or the other.
i've used a 50% reduction since i started working on cars in the 80s, and my grandfather taught me that, who was a Tech 5 Tank mechanic in WWII. I've never had a failure due to improper torque; ever.
5-90's research and physics are spot on; I'm now intrigued.
I just emailed them asking for a complete explanation.
I also emailed a friend, who is an engineer here at USC.
We shall, get a explanation one way or the other.
i've used a 50% reduction since i started working on cars in the 80s, and my grandfather taught me that, who was a Tech 5 Tank mechanic in WWII. I've never had a failure due to improper torque; ever.
5-90's research and physics are spot on; I'm now intrigued.
Absent other verified/reliable information, I see no reason to discontinue torque reduction from "clean, dry" values - they've held up well under experiential and experimental conditions. Unless the compounds have been reformulated, which is the part I don't know.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NVRicochet3006
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
13
Sep 24, 2015 09:43 PM
realien
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
8
Sep 21, 2015 07:23 AM
codykrr
Modified XJ Cherokee Tech
9
Sep 18, 2015 01:27 PM
cerami50
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
13
Sep 14, 2015 10:28 PM
Sandyman
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
5
Sep 5, 2015 07:56 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)



