4.0 H.O into a 90 XJ
#2
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,383
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
1 Post
Year: 1988 limited
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 litre
option A: you keep the head of the old engine and swap only lhe block, no need to change wires.
option B: you swap the whole engine and you will need ECM + harness and complete exhaust (manifold, pipes etc. )
option B: you swap the whole engine and you will need ECM + harness and complete exhaust (manifold, pipes etc. )
#3
Member
What is the diffrents between the HO and none HO jeep motors ??
#4
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,383
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
1 Post
Year: 1988 limited
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 litre
In 1991 chrysler redesigned the inner casting geometry, added some stiffeners and made a new head with higher intake ports to optimize air flow and reduce noise and vibrations. Also the exhaust was redesigned. This lead to a power gain from 177hp to 192hp that was called HO (high output).
The visible difference is in the head, exhaust and intake cannot be swapped between the two engines, but the heads are interchangeable with the blocks.
The electroncs was also completely redimensioned, new sensors, new connectors, new computer. The two systems are not compatible. The HO engine does not have a knock sensor (not very important but still) and the TPS is a single unit (same signal for ECU and TCU) against the renix double unit sensor where the outputs are two. Fuel rail is without pressure regulator on the HO engine and injectors are higher flow rate.
The visible difference is in the head, exhaust and intake cannot be swapped between the two engines, but the heads are interchangeable with the blocks.
The electroncs was also completely redimensioned, new sensors, new connectors, new computer. The two systems are not compatible. The HO engine does not have a knock sensor (not very important but still) and the TPS is a single unit (same signal for ECU and TCU) against the renix double unit sensor where the outputs are two. Fuel rail is without pressure regulator on the HO engine and injectors are higher flow rate.
Trending Topics
#11
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,383
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
1 Post
Year: 1988 limited
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 litre
If you bolt a renix intake on the HO motor you are going to cover .125 inch of intake port with the manifold gasket. At this point it is useless that you use a HO head.
#13
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,383
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
1 Post
Year: 1988 limited
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 litre
The HO engine without its electronics and manifolds, (remember TB diameter is bigger) is just 1/2 HO.
At this point, i wouldn't bother removing the manifolds from the heads (known to be a PITA) and SWAP THE ENTIRE HEADS with the manifolds. Much easier.
#14
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1993
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
I did not report anything. The only mod I had to do was the 2 bolt holes on each end of the exhaust manfold had to be open up a little. Other then that every thing bolted up.