Any one have a picture of how they attached the upper link to the drivers side mount in a 3 link application?
CF Veteran
the factory mount is cast into the housing and is plenty strong. what isnt strong in the bolt diameter.
currie makes a replacement joint that fits in there and uses a larger bolt. Rock krawler as well.
currie makes a replacement joint that fits in there and uses a larger bolt. Rock krawler as well.
Well from the threads on naxja I read people seem to want to go to the other side for the 3 link. Passenger side does make more sense now that I think about it.


Junior Member
I run mine on the drivers side. (RK 3 link)
The RK joint for this application is actually pretty nifty.
OP, if you're dead set on using the passenger side you're going to want to seriously beef up that mount.
The RK joint for this application is actually pretty nifty.
OP, if you're dead set on using the passenger side you're going to want to seriously beef up that mount.
I'm not dead set on any thing at all yet.
All I know is it will be a mid arm 3 link.
Just I think that after beefing up that Joint it will be less engineering and simpler for me to do because their is more room.
All I know is it will be a mid arm 3 link.
Just I think that after beefing up that Joint it will be less engineering and simpler for me to do because their is more room.
CF Veteran
clayton uses a weld-on "bridge" for their 3 link system
http://claytonoffroad.com/product_in...roducts_id/303
this was the route I was going to go for my 3 link because heims. but then I abandoned project because dana 30
http://claytonoffroad.com/product_in...roducts_id/303
this was the route I was going to go for my 3 link because heims. but then I abandoned project because dana 30
CF Veteran
Quote:
The RK joint for this application is actually pretty nifty.
OP, if you're dead set on using the passenger side you're going to want to seriously beef up that mount.
Eff that. Its less work just to chop it off and put a nice, strong link tower in. Doing anything to that stock mount is just turd polishing.Originally Posted by lowrange2
I run mine on the drivers side. (RK 3 link)The RK joint for this application is actually pretty nifty.
OP, if you're dead set on using the passenger side you're going to want to seriously beef up that mount.
I was thinking ballistic or ruffstuff link tower. For the replacement of the passenger side.
Junior Member
Quote:
Well, I guess that's what I really meant to say but didn't. Originally Posted by ktmracer419
Eff that. Its less work just to chop it off and put a nice, strong link tower in. Doing anything to that stock mount is just turd polishing.
Everyone likes a little polished turd every now and then.
CF Veteran
Quote:
yumOriginally Posted by lowrange2
Everyone likes a little polished turd every now and then.
With the passenger side having the upper link will their be enough support on the drivers side?
Former Sponsor
Enough support for what? Everything you need to know has been beaten to death on multiple forums, you can search for everything you need to know.
At least 2 people that have responded here have built mid-arm 3 links and have build threads. Some even in their sig with a nice link to them.
Check them out if you seriously plan to build a 3-link.
At least 2 people that have responded here have built mid-arm 3 links and have build threads. Some even in their sig with a nice link to them.
Check them out if you seriously plan to build a 3-link.