Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

which of these XJ's are cheapier to build 96 or 97

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2013 | 05:48 PM
  #1  
Nick207's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default which of these XJ's are cheapier to build 96 or 97

Which is cheapier to build for a DD/WW? 96 or 97 I love both of them just gotta know which cost less to build. And is the OBD1 and OBD2 a big difference?

Last edited by Nick207; Nov 30, 2013 at 05:50 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2013 | 06:01 PM
  #2  
MonacaYankee's Avatar
CF Veteran
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 9
From: Georgia
Year: 99 94
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: I6
Default

Originally Posted by Nick207
Which is cheapier to build for a DD/WW? 96 or 97 I love both of them just gotta know which cost less to build. And is the OBD1 and OBD2 a big difference?
96 and 97 are both obd2
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2013 | 06:24 PM
  #3  
Nick207's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by MonacaYankee
96 and 97 are both obd2
I didn't know that.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2013 | 06:26 PM
  #4  
Nick207's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

But you didn't answer the question
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2013 | 06:29 PM
  #5  
MonacaYankee's Avatar
CF Veteran
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 9
From: Georgia
Year: 99 94
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: I6
Default

Originally Posted by Nick207
But you didn't answer the question
Price difference is negligible. It's always expensive..
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2013 | 06:31 PM
  #6  
95Cherokee's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 3
From: Houston Tx.
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

I would say the 96, since it's the old body style there's probably more of them to pick parts off of at the junk yard, my junk yard maybe has twice as many of the old body style XJ's than 97+'s.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2013 | 10:02 PM
  #7  
DieselDaze's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa,Oklahoma
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

talk about a hypothetical, there's no way to answer this directly... as one may be in worse shape than the other requiring more work... its a toss up even if they were apples to apples, but as 95 cherokee said It all about what JY parts you have more readily available in your area if in fact you need JY parts... otherwise they're the same its just a matter of what interior you like better
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2013 | 10:10 PM
  #8  
xjmarc's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,420
Likes: 0
From: Soddy Daisy TN
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

The 96 has a bunch of year specific electronic goodies but like others said body parts are easier to find. Suspension wise they are exactly the same. Very few 96s got the 29 spline 8.25, most were 27 spline but all the 97s with the 8.25 had 29 spline.
It really depends on what your end goal is. One mans DD may be on 31s and another runs 37s.
The 97 has the better interior in my opinion but others will argue that. They seem to be roomier.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2013 | 10:20 PM
  #9  
JWheeler's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: WA
Model: Cherokee
Default

Don't think either would be cheaper to build. I love my 96 but would go with the 97 because of the updated interior.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2013 | 11:27 PM
  #10  
DieselDaze's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa,Oklahoma
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

i have a '97 and while I like the interior I may like the pre interior for nostalgic reasons better..
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2013 | 12:09 AM
  #11  
dmill89's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 918
Likes: 6
From: Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Default

Originally Posted by DieselDaze
i have a '97 and while I like the interior I may like the pre interior for nostalgic reasons better..
X2, the 97+ interior is definitely "nicer" but there is something to be said about the simple utilitarian design of the pre-97 interior, and of course the ease of pulling it apart when necessary. Also due to no passenger air-bag and more flat-spots on the dash there are more places to mount (at least easily) accessory gauges, switches, etc., but no cup holders (though there are several options for adding them).
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2013 | 12:46 AM
  #12  
andrewmp6's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,014
Likes: 17
From: Louisville,KY
Model: Cherokee
Default

I like the 96 interior better the 97 up looks like a wrangler to me.Both years are pretty much even on mods to a point,It comes down to which body style and interior you like more.I will say the 96 interior gives you more room to add gauges switches stuff like that.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2013 | 01:47 AM
  #13  
Nick207's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

I love both of them but I'm leaning towards the 97 because I like the interior and the grille better. But it all comes down to which ones cheaper. I guess it's function over fashion. They have to be a sport because I love the black grilles better.

Last edited by Nick207; Dec 1, 2013 at 01:49 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2013 | 01:28 PM
  #14  
tmj91's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

To "build" one, they would be identical in price. Because the things you add to "build" them (think aftermarket parts) are going to be the same parts. Now regular maintenance and stock replacements might be a different story.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2013 | 02:24 PM
  #15  
Nick207's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

I guess I'm trying to ask which one is cheapier or easier to find parts for.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM.