Sign the petition
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 86
Likes: 1
From: Shoreline, WA
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Seasoned Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Sutton, New Hampshire
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
We need something a little more comprehensive than 'bring it back'. If you leave it open to them what exactly to design the new Cherokee for, they'll just turn it into another road queen with limited offroad capability.
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 999
Likes: 0
From: Brentwood, TN
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
CF Veteran
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 1
From: Northern Vermont
Year: '89
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 242
Ok, so the "liberty" may have replaced the XJ...but If you take a look at the Commander, I think that is the "new XJ", IMO.....Same square boxxy look at least...although I am not a fan of the front suspension...Seems like the wrangler is the only Jeep still produced with straight axles...
CF Veteran
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 1
From: Northern Vermont
Year: '89
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 242
Its like hoping to win at saratoga raceway, by betting everything on a 3 LEGGED HORSE!OH BTW, I got 2 more compliments today on how good my '89 looks
CF Veteran
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,487
Likes: 0
From: Parrish
Year: 1989
Model: Comanche
Engine: 4.0
x2 on bringing back the 4.0 However Chrysler will never bring either back. Also the commander is not the "new cherokee" The new liberty was made boxier to appeal to old XJ owners. However you will not see me behind that craptastic minivan engine if you killed me and tried to stuff me in the drivers seat. Give me a engine worthy to be in a Jeep and I will drive it.