Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

That jeep thing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 10:23 PM
  #16  
bopeep94's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 0
From: AURORA, CO
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L i6 high output
Default

noooooo. at the rate they're going, the new xj's would look like mini vans..
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 10:28 PM
  #17  
UsmclovesXJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
::Regional Moderator::
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 10
From: Jacksonville, NC
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6 4.0L HO
Default

Originally Posted by bopeep94
noooooo. at the rate they're going, the new xj's would look like mini vans..
haha.. true i think the new breed of jeeps should kinda fall off the earth lol...but i would like to at least c a concept of a new jeep xj. why did production end for xjs in 2001 anyway???
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 10:29 PM
  #18  
bopeep94's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 0
From: AURORA, CO
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L i6 high output
Default

Originally Posted by UsmclovesXJ
haha.. true i think the new breed of jeeps should kinda fall off the earth lol...but i would like to at least c a concept of a new jeep xj. why did production end for xjs in 2001 anyway???
damn good question.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 10:31 PM
  #19  
UsmclovesXJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
::Regional Moderator::
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 10
From: Jacksonville, NC
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6 4.0L HO
Default

Originally Posted by bopeep94
damn good question.
EVER XJ OWNER LETS ROIT FOR A NEW JEEP XJ haha justkidding. but i would love love love to see a come back.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 10:36 PM
  #20  
bopeep94's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 0
From: AURORA, CO
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L i6 high output
Default

id be scared if they tried to bring the cherokee back.... they'd try too hard to make it "different" and it would turn out the same as everything else thats new. it sucks!
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 10:39 PM
  #21  
UsmclovesXJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
::Regional Moderator::
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 10
From: Jacksonville, NC
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6 4.0L HO
Default

Originally Posted by bopeep94
id be scared if they tried to bring the cherokee back.... they'd try too hard to make it "different" and it would turn out the same as everything else thats new. it sucks!
mmm...true now that you say it...whats the deal with the new 2012 line up. only thing worth money is the jeep wranglers.....try off roading in a stock grand cherokee then call me lol...soccer mom van times 10
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 10:40 PM
  #22  
White92's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

They'd bring it back - but make it a crossover or something border line and put that god forsaken 3.7L in it like every other piece that chrysler has conjured up since they bought the jeep name.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 10:42 PM
  #23  
bopeep94's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 0
From: AURORA, CO
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L i6 high output
Default

yea its just a bunch of bull.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 10:45 PM
  #24  
UsmclovesXJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
::Regional Moderator::
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 10
From: Jacksonville, NC
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6 4.0L HO
Default

Yes it is... Call Chrysler to make the old xjs same body..maybe few changes not a cross over.make it a 4.6L stoker engine as stock...not no 3.7L bull****
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 10:49 PM
  #25  
CatBassin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Yea a new XJ would probably suck. It would have IFS and have a stupid Liberty front end. The I6 would be gone and it would probably be AWD. And don't forget the 20's.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 10:52 PM
  #26  
bopeep94's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 0
From: AURORA, CO
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L i6 high output
Default

lol true... they better NOT bring them back. it would be a disaster!
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 10:52 PM
  #27  
UsmclovesXJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
::Regional Moderator::
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 10
From: Jacksonville, NC
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6 4.0L HO
Default

That should not be called a jeep lol...thats border line geo tracker lol. Whoes with me on that 1 ..geo tracker vs. Jeep xj stock 4wd jeep will win
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 10:52 PM
  #28  
farmerjohnson's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Camp Lejeune, NC
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

why did they ditch the 4.0? theres nothing wrong with it
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 10:54 PM
  #29  
UsmclovesXJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
::Regional Moderator::
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 10
From: Jacksonville, NC
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6 4.0L HO
Default

Noo clue but it was loved and will be missed rip. 4.0L HO
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2011 | 10:55 PM
  #30  
CatBassin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by UsmclovesXJ
That should not be called a jeep lol...thats border line geo tracker lol. Whoes with me on that 1 ..geo tracker vs. Jeep xj stock 4wd jeep will win
Shoot even a 2wd XJ would win.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 AM.