Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

haha awesome.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 11:09 AM
  #31  
fantic238's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,383
Likes: 5
Year: 1988 limited
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 litre
Default

the "baby seals being clubbed" is the turbo by-pass valve that opens every time you step off the gas pedal so that the rurbo continues spinning at 100.000 rpm and as soon as you put the foot back on the gas you have immediately full power and almost no turbo lag..
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 11:16 AM
  #32  
halmotors's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Sutton, New Hampshire
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

I know what a BoV sounds like. It was a joke. Show me where you can buy THAT car from an Audi dealership. I dare you. You can't, because that specific car wasn't offered for sale. Oh sure, the base car it was modeled after was offered for sale, but it was nowhere near that gnarly.

And believe what you want about the AWD thing...but it's true. If I can find the writeup for it, I'll post it for you. In dry or inclement weather, the BMW system outperformed Quattro pretty handily.

*edit* I can't find the article, but it was in the November, 1988 issue of Road and Track. Here's a quote:

The rear traction bias of the iX and its balanced front-to-rear weight distribution provide superior traction on low friction surfaces when compared to the Audi 90, the Audi 90 Quattro, and the rear drive BMW325is. Road and Track ("Snow Test", Nov,'88) concluded, "Front-drive cars do not like to accelerate on slick surfaces." R and T also concludes that the 90 Quattro does not perform as well as the iX, saying, "Our acceleration champ was the iX. The AWD BMW was a blink quicker than the Quattro to 20 mph, 4.9 sec vs. 5.1 sec." In the hill climb, R and T says, "Once again, the BMW AWD system proved superior to the Quattro arangement." In the lane change, R and T says, "And again, the 325iX was the best."

Last edited by halmotors; Mar 30, 2010 at 11:20 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 11:24 AM
  #33  
fantic238's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,383
Likes: 5
Year: 1988 limited
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 litre
Default

Originally Posted by halmotors
I know what a BoV sounds like. It was a joke. Show me where you can buy THAT car from an Audi dealership. I dare you. You can't, because that specific car wasn't offered for sale. Oh sure, the base car it was modeled after was offered for sale, but it was nowhere near that gnarly.

And believe what you want about the AWD thing...but it's true. If I can find the writeup for it, I'll post it for you. In dry or inclement weather, the BMW system outperformed Quattro pretty handily.
The S1 quattro stopped production in 1985 but there are plenty of used ones for sale if you have enough money.
Here is your AUDI.
http://www.autoscout24.ch/AS24Web/De...4&page=1&row=4
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 11:26 AM
  #34  
halmotors's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Sutton, New Hampshire
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by fantic238
The S1 quattro stopped production in 1985 but there are plenty of used ones for sale if you have enough money.
Here is your AUDI.
http://www.autoscout24.ch/AS24Web/De...4&page=1&row=4
That's not even remotely close to being the same vehicle.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 11:30 AM
  #35  
fantic238's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,383
Likes: 5
Year: 1988 limited
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 litre
Default

... and the best rally driver ever:
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 11:35 AM
  #36  
fantic238's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,383
Likes: 5
Year: 1988 limited
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 litre
Default

Originally Posted by halmotors
That's not even remotely close to being the same vehicle.
beleive it or not, it's the same car. The obvious differences are the absence of the spoilers and stickers hahaha
The engine, tranny, diffs and all the drive train is the same.
Power was locked to 400 hp with a rev limiter but... ya know...
They still produce a body kit to make it exactly like the Pikes Peak version that won in 1985.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 11:38 AM
  #37  
halmotors's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Sutton, New Hampshire
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

He's good...but Tajima and his XL-7 are better.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 11:54 AM
  #38  
fantic238's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,383
Likes: 5
Year: 1988 limited
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 litre
Default

Originally Posted by halmotors
He's good...but Tajima and his XL-7 are better.
how can you compare two cars with 23 years of difference? There was 0 electronics in the Audi, no traction control, no electronic injection, nothing...
100% mechanical and drivers ability.
The suzuki has 300 hp more than the audi.
let's compare the timing:
Rohrl back in 1985 did it in 10'47.22"
Tajima in 2008 did 10'14.08"

only 34 seconds of difference... after 23 years
now who's better?
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 11:56 AM
  #39  
halmotors's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Sutton, New Hampshire
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by fantic238
only 34 seconds of difference... after 23 years
now who's better?
Tajima. I didn't even have to present proof of it, you did it for me. 34 seconds doesn't sound like much, but on any race track, whether it's drift, rally, or tarmac...that's an ENORMOUS amount of time.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 12:04 PM
  #40  
fantic238's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,383
Likes: 5
Year: 1988 limited
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 litre
Default

Originally Posted by halmotors
Tajima. I didn't even have to present proof of it, you did it for me. 34 seconds doesn't sound like much, but on any race track, whether it's drift, rally, or tarmac...that's an ENORMOUS amount of time.
Not in rally, and not with 23 years of difference.
The only car+driver that i accept could compete with the S1 is the Lancia Delta S4, 1.8 four cylinder turbo+supercharger 640hp driven by Henry Toivonen.
Rohrl is just better because he did not tragically die like Toivonen, and note that i am Italian and i have a natural inclination towards Italian cars but i still prefer the Audi.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 03:29 PM
  #41  
sd_dragon28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: spearfish, SD
Year: 74
Model: Wagoneer
Engine: 318
Default

spoiler alert: 74 dodge ramcharger was the first vehicle with awd and is the best so neah neah
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 04:46 PM
  #42  
DagBMX's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: Lake Orion, MI
Year: 2008
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 3.0L CRD
Default


Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 05:07 PM
  #43  
halmotors's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Sutton, New Hampshire
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by DagBMX
Hah, Cherokee Convertible.
Looks like a bunch of rich kids being stupid.

Last edited by halmotors; Mar 30, 2010 at 05:09 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 05:22 PM
  #44  
DagBMX's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: Lake Orion, MI
Year: 2008
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 3.0L CRD
Default

^when i saw the first one with the chopped top,i thought it actually looks pretty good. and defiantly on the second video: i think someone failed physics in high school, lol.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Eli Brda
Introductions
10
Aug 21, 2019 12:58 PM
kend3031
Stock Grand Cherokee Tech. All ZJ/WJ/WK Non-modified/stock questions go here!
1
Sep 30, 2015 08:15 AM
Chick-N-Picker
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
8
Sep 18, 2015 12:15 PM
Chick-N-Picker
Cherokee Chat
1
Sep 16, 2015 09:20 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 AM.