Best/Worst tug of war ever.
The chevy driver was a wuss. If he had any stones he would have just hit the dodge driver instead of saying "do it again". The dodge should have pulled him around again.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Yeah I would have turned and flipped that ram another direction instead of get dragged around a parking lot. Looked like the chevy guy said f*** this and just hit the brakes while the Ram floored gas.
CF Veteran
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,322
Likes: 6
From: Summerville, Ga
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.5 4 cyl.
Lol he should have started pulling as soon as the dodge stopped after he dragged him around the parking lot. Get some momentum and he ain't gonna be able to stop it.
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Olympia, WA
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
CF Veteran
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,322
Likes: 6
From: Summerville, Ga
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.5 4 cyl.
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Olympia, WA
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
CF Veteran
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,322
Likes: 6
From: Summerville, Ga
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.5 4 cyl.
You can make anything bulletproof by replacing everything in and on it. Still doesnt make the engine in stock form worth a damn. The lawsuit created by the many recalls is why international and ford are no longer friends. Im no fan of the 6.4 either. They're not as bad as the 6.0, but they're arent an immense amount better either. 7.3's are the only powerstroke i dont think of as junk.
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Olympia, WA
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
You can make anything bulletproof by replacing everything in and on it. Still doesnt make the engine in stock form worth a damn. The lawsuit created by the many recalls is why international and ford are no longer friends. Im no fan of the 6.4 either. They're not as bad as the 6.0, but they're arent an immense amount better either. 7.3's are the only powerstroke i dont think of as junk.
Thread Starter
Cherokee Forum Vendor
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Fort Dix, NJ :(
Year: 99
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4ho
Not quite. That motor is reliable as hell. However, Ford changed a ton of stuff on it after navistar said it wasn't a good idea. If that motor was such a turd than international wouldn't be running the ever loving **** out of them for 3/4 a million miles+. Ford changed the coolant, boost, that terrible ****ing EGR valve, all the emissions bullcrap..... I could go on all day.
Last edited by Lyferxb9s; Dec 18, 2012 at 07:28 PM.
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Olympia, WA
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
No. And I don't really care to have it dyno'd. Thousands of other 6.4's running the same set up, dyno'd at between 575-625HP and around 1300lbs. That's good enough for me. And like I said, I wasn't trying to turn this into an argument. Just sticking up for the other Powerstrokes. Why do I need to prove this to you anyway?
EDIT: For the sake of different dyno's giving different numbers, we'll say 500-600.
EDIT: For the sake of different dyno's giving different numbers, we'll say 500-600.
Last edited by kennyWA; Dec 18, 2012 at 08:10 PM.


