Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

Best Cold Air Intake for the money?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 23, 2015 | 08:47 PM
  #1  
Brandon28XJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default Best Cold Air Intake for the money?

Title explains it all just wondering what the best cold air intake for the 4.0 for the money is?
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2015 | 09:10 PM
  #2  
thatXJguy's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 6
From: Hudson, FL
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Inline 6
Default

The stock one.

Don't waste your money on these aftermarket "improvements" that supposedly give you more power and efficiency, because they don't.

Reply
Old Jan 23, 2015 | 11:17 PM
  #3  
XJlimitedx99's Avatar
CF Veteran
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 355
From: Andover, VT
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0 L
Default

Spectre or Thor cowl intake. That's the only "CAI" I would consider using.

The typical cone filter stuck on the end of the intake tube is just dumb. It just sucks hot air and leaves the filter exposed to water and the elements.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2015 | 11:19 PM
  #4  
thatXJguy's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 6
From: Hudson, FL
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Inline 6
Default

Originally Posted by XJlimitedx99
Spectre or Thor cowl intake. That's the only "CAI" I would consider using.
And not for power....


Just for the sake that it's higher than the stock one, giving you more of a "snorkel."
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2015 | 11:29 PM
  #5  
XJlimitedx99's Avatar
CF Veteran
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 355
From: Andover, VT
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0 L
Default

Originally Posted by thatXJguy
And not for power.... Just for the sake that it's higher than the stock one, giving you more of a "snorkel."
I wouldn't do it for power, but you will draw significantly colder air with the cowl intake. It's not like it will make much of a difference by itself though. I could see it making decent gains with the cowl intake, 62mm tb, and free flowing exhaust. Whether it's worth the extra few ponies for that much money is hard to say.

Edit: here is a very good read with some real world numbers on cowl intakes. I was pretty much sold after reading this. https://www.cherokeeforum.com/f67/co...veness-165025/
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2015 | 11:55 PM
  #6  
thatXJguy's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 6
From: Hudson, FL
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Inline 6
Default

Originally Posted by XJlimitedx99
I wouldn't do it for power, but you will draw significantly colder air with the cowl intake. It's not like it will make much of a difference by itself though. I could see it making decent gains with the cowl intake, 62mm tb, and free flowing exhaust. Whether it's worth the extra few ponies for that much money is hard to say.

Edit: here is a very good read with some real world numbers on cowl intakes. I was pretty much sold after reading this. https://www.cherokeeforum.com/f67/co...veness-165025/
From what I've read, even though a 62mm throttle body matches the hole size of the intake itself, the engine is only capable of drawing in enough air (naturally, of course) as the stock throttle body allows. Sadly, I believe this is just another one of those "placebo effect" mods like the 784 injectors and cold air intakes.

I tried the 62mm throttle body, and within days, I removed it and sold it. There was no noticeable gain to justify the price. I do use a Banks cat-back exhaust too, which flows 108% better than stock (that did something and I can notice it around the higher RPMs).

In the end, if you watch that video I linked above, you'll see that even a COLD air intake doesn't really affect the engine's performance any. The only real benefit to an intake as you're describing is that it's higher up, and allows water-crossing.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2015 | 01:53 AM
  #7  
andrewmp6's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,014
Likes: 17
From: Louisville,KY
Model: Cherokee
Default

Like said leave it stock or go for a cowl intake if you go off road.As far as cold air intakes a f150 forum they took all of of them offered for a truck and dyno tested them all out.It was about 10 or 15 of them in total only one showed any gains.The rest did stock numbers or they lost a few hp with.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2015 | 03:48 AM
  #8  
XJmike0122's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 1
From: Eaton Co
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by thatXJguy
The stock one.

Don't waste your money on these aftermarket "improvements" that supposedly give you more power and efficiency, because they don't.

Cold Air Intakes Mythbusted [Naturally Aspirated] - YouTube
Why did you post that vid? That S2K made 5hp more with the cold air intake. They did say rotary motors lost hp with a aftermarket intake but I don't remember XJs ever coming with those.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2015 | 06:01 AM
  #9  
BrawnyDog's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 641
Likes: 1
From: Anderson, SC
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Alright then, not to high jack but if a CAI is not worth the cost simply for the sake if being a CAI, is there a particular stock filter that is more efficient than others?
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2015 | 08:00 AM
  #10  
ehall's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 3
From: Southern Maryland
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 1999 4.0L
Default

WIX or NAPA Gold filters are best
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2015 | 08:35 AM
  #11  
XJlimitedx99's Avatar
CF Veteran
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 355
From: Andover, VT
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0 L
Default

Originally Posted by thatXJguy
From what I've read, even though a 62mm throttle body matches the hole size of the intake itself, the engine is only capable of drawing in enough air (naturally, of course) as the stock throttle body allows. Sadly, I believe this is just another one of those "placebo effect" mods like the 784 injectors and cold air intakes. I tried the 62mm throttle body, and within days, I removed it and sold it. There was no noticeable gain to justify the price. I do use a Banks cat-back exhaust too, which flows 108% better than stock (that did something and I can notice it around the higher RPMs). In the end, if you watch that video I linked above, you'll see that even a COLD air intake doesn't really affect the engine's performance any. The only real benefit to an intake as you're describing is that it's higher up, and allows water-crossing.
Hm that's the first time I've heard that about the 62mm tb. And in that video they proved it made more power with the CAI..
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2015 | 07:22 PM
  #12  
thatXJguy's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 6
From: Hudson, FL
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Inline 6
Default

Originally Posted by XJlimitedx99
Hm that's the first time I've heard that about the 62mm tb. And in that video they proved it made more power with the CAI..
Nothing major – no real power and definitely no 1-2 mpg increase like a lot of people are going to tell you that you get. Jeep engines really don't have anything more to gain from them.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2015 | 08:14 PM
  #13  
XJlimitedx99's Avatar
CF Veteran
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 355
From: Andover, VT
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0 L
Default

Originally Posted by thatXJguy
Nothing major – no real power and definitely no 1-2 mpg increase like a lot of people are going to tell you that you get. Jeep engines really don't have anything more to gain from them.
The way I see it is that it's not about what you get from each mod, but the sum of everything you can do. I feel like every little mod will compliment each other. If I could see some small power gains and mpg from doing intake, exhaust and injectors then I'd be happy. And let's be honest, I want to do an exhaust cause it sounds cool, not as much for the power
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2015 | 09:04 PM
  #14  
ehall's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 3
From: Southern Maryland
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 1999 4.0L
Default

Most performance mods are about improving efficiency. With a four stroke engine, only one stroke makes power, and the other three consume power. Something like an air filter won't ever "create" any power but may make the engine spend less energy sucking air through the intake at high RPMs. Some mods actually will create more power, things like ignition and fuel delivery mods that result in better combustion can create more power from the same amount of fuel through fuller cleaner burn. But generally speaking, if you want more power you need a bigger explosion and for that you need a bigger chamber--there's no replacement for displacement (generally, things like forced air induction are another ball).

ps--I have a cold air setup with a cone filter, to help the bored throttle body and 99 intake breathe easier. Until a couple of weeks ago I had it in the cowl to free up space in the engine bay for additional accessories like air compressor (plus the other advantages of having it in the cowl), but moved it in the bay temporarily because of a parts change.

Last edited by ehall; Jan 24, 2015 at 09:15 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2015 | 09:17 PM
  #15  
thatXJguy's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 6
From: Hudson, FL
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Inline 6
Default

Originally Posted by XJlimitedx99
And let's be honest, I want to do an exhaust cause it sounds cool, not as much for the power
I went with Banks Power Monster cat-back exhaust system and saw great improvement in higher end pulling power when flooring it down the road.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 AM.