1987 Samurai
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Blacksburg, VA
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L, K&N filter, throttle body riser, Rugged Ridge header
Hey!
So I'm fairly new to offroading, and have unfortunately caught the 'bug' as it were...
Anyways, I have been looking around at used offroading vehicles, and came across a listing for a 1987 Samurai. At the Big Dogs Icebreaker this year I saw a couple of these being used...what's the scoop / consensus on them? I like the styling on these a bit more than on the YJ or the TJ, but how do they stack up in terms of performance? The group leader on the Friday nighttime run at the Icebreaker was in one of them, and had no trouble running Trickle (unlike Rockhead and me in the stock XJ!).
Thanks!
So I'm fairly new to offroading, and have unfortunately caught the 'bug' as it were...

Anyways, I have been looking around at used offroading vehicles, and came across a listing for a 1987 Samurai. At the Big Dogs Icebreaker this year I saw a couple of these being used...what's the scoop / consensus on them? I like the styling on these a bit more than on the YJ or the TJ, but how do they stack up in terms of performance? The group leader on the Friday nighttime run at the Icebreaker was in one of them, and had no trouble running Trickle (unlike Rockhead and me in the stock XJ!).
Thanks!
CF Veteran
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,588
Likes: 495
From: Chico, CA
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.3L with headers and full 3" exhaust system
From Warrenton eh? Wife was born and raised in Astoria. She still has property there and we visit from time to time. Anyway, Sammys are a very capable rig in the PNW. They are really great in tight areas, which there is an abundance of up there. They are also as cheap or cheaper to mod as XJs. I have an 88 siting behind my shop waiting for its turn.
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
Don't get rid of the XJ but they are tons of fun. My buddy has one and they are great for cruising. But not a daily driver. Also, if you plan to do serious offroading, but a roll cage in. The factory cage is a joke.
Sent from my iPhone using CherokeeFM
Sent from my iPhone using CherokeeFM
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Blacksburg, VA
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L, K&N filter, throttle body riser, Rugged Ridge header
Thanks for the input, all!
What kind of gas economy do these things get? They seem to have smaller engines (1324 cc), but I really don't know how that plays with having the larger tires and such (as I'm pretty mechanically ignorant). I'm not a daily driver by any means and really only drive for fun, so economy isn't that big of a deal...it's still nice to know though!
What kind of gas economy do these things get? They seem to have smaller engines (1324 cc), but I really don't know how that plays with having the larger tires and such (as I'm pretty mechanically ignorant). I'm not a daily driver by any means and really only drive for fun, so economy isn't that big of a deal...it's still nice to know though!
CF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 3
From: S.E. Tx
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6 firepower ignition, cat-back w/ magnaflow muffler, poweraid tb spacer, optima blue top
I would say to pass on it. It has an engine swap to a 4.3l chevy v6, although that is a one of the best swaps for a Sami, its still an engine swap. And all kinds of problems can come from one not done properly, so i wouldn't recommend one for a beginner. As well you're not going to see those mpg numbers out of this one. Its also a hard top model which are more proned to rollovers than the convertibles, and aren't open air. A few years back Sami's prices went up considerably and i've wanted one since i was little, but not several thousands for one.
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
Oh I didn't notice the link I though it was stock or at least stock engine. You will not get that high of MPGs from a 4.3l. Find a stock one if you want a Sammy and build from there.
Sent from my iPhone using CherokeeFM
Sent from my iPhone using CherokeeFM
CF Veteran



Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 18,786
Likes: 14
From: CT.
Year: 88
Model: Comanche (MJ)
Engine: 4.0 HO
I had a 87 sammy. Was a tough little truck for bone stock. Even wheeled the crap out of it. Only thing I disliked was it had no top in the winter and it was way to under powered.
So every time I wheeled it I used 4L to make up for the power it did not have.
So every time I wheeled it I used 4L to make up for the power it did not have.
CF Veteran
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,588
Likes: 495
From: Chico, CA
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.3L with headers and full 3" exhaust system
I never got good milage when my Sammy was stock. The engine works too hard. It is all the way on all the time unless you are stopping. After owning one with an stock engine, I would not have another without some type of engine conversion.
CF Veteran
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,588
Likes: 495
From: Chico, CA
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.3L with headers and full 3" exhaust system
CF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 3
From: S.E. Tx
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6 firepower ignition, cat-back w/ magnaflow muffler, poweraid tb spacer, optima blue top
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cdf43
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
18
Sep 9, 2015 02:47 AM
Tj Cope
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
2
Aug 22, 2015 12:51 PM
kansas_jeeping
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
6
Aug 31, 2009 08:01 AM
ixoni
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
11
Aug 26, 2009 06:58 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)



