Jeep Builds Make your own jeep build thread here, discuss and view jeeps here. All Jeep models are welcome here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

The Long-Process Cherokee

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 22, 2015 | 12:34 AM
  #31  
poorboy76's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Arvada
Year: 1991
Model: Comanche (MJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Thanks guys! I now sit on 33x10.5's. They fit and I have complete steering, but I have yet to take her off road. Without having longer bumpstops, i'm sure I will bottom out on the fender. New gears are hopefully getting put in
in January, depending on the time and money.







Originally Posted by Jrozar
Looks good...I like the tailbone just installed one last month.
I love my Tailbone. It weighs less than most tire carriers, got good recovery points, looks great...
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2015 | 10:58 AM
  #32  
unidentifiedbomb's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 6,098
Likes: 250
From: DE
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6 4.0
Default

Can't wait to mount my 33x10.50 KM2s
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2015 | 07:33 PM
  #33  
poorboy76's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Arvada
Year: 1991
Model: Comanche (MJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by unidentifiedbomb
Can't wait to mount my 33x10.50 KM2s
I love that size. The 33x12.5's often look balloon-y, and you shed a small amount of unnecessary weight by going narrower.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2015 | 10:05 PM
  #34  
unidentifiedbomb's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 6,098
Likes: 250
From: DE
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by poorboy76

I love that size. The 33x12.5's often look balloon-y, and you shed a small amount of unnecessary weight by going narrower.

Agree, besides looks I don't see much of a reason to go 12.50s. Wish more companies made 10.50s
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2015 | 10:26 PM
  #35  
poorboy76's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Arvada
Year: 1991
Model: Comanche (MJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by unidentifiedbomb
Agree, besides looks I don't see much of a reason to go 12.50s. Wish more companies made 10.50s
Agreed. I know General makes the Grabber in a 10.50, but besides that, there aren't many options.


On a side note, I'll be putting about 250 miles on the Jeep tomorrow with the 33's. I installed a separate transmission cooler to help with temps, but i'm interested to see what my mpg's will drop to while climbing up the Rockies. They were around 23 mpg on the 30" Coopers. I'm prepared to be disappointed.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2015 | 10:02 PM
  #36  
poorboy76's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Arvada
Year: 1991
Model: Comanche (MJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

I averaged 18.6 mpg's (figured using Google Maps) on the 33's! I find that really surprising. But it struggled to climb passes and stay in one gear, so the 4.56's are going to happen soon.




I also took it wheeling and discovered that bumpstops in the rear are necessary.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2016 | 11:16 PM
  #37  
poorboy76's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Arvada
Year: 1991
Model: Comanche (MJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

I installed the 8.25 with Liberty discs, and the stopping is incredible! So much better than stock! Now i'm taking this to get 4.88's put in tomorrow! Can't wait for the power to improve! I'll get thorough testing with the 265's soon; I'm driving 250 miles of mountain passes immediately after for spring break.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2016 | 01:25 AM
  #38  
poorboy76's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Arvada
Year: 1991
Model: Comanche (MJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default






Long story short: 33's, 4.88's, and Colorado are a perfect match!
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2016 | 12:24 AM
  #39  
poorboy76's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Arvada
Year: 1991
Model: Comanche (MJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

And I pulled of an amazing 21.8 mpg while hauling *** over the Colorado mountain passes! Serious win!
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2016 | 11:50 AM
  #40  
poorboy76's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Arvada
Year: 1991
Model: Comanche (MJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Updates!!!

First, I got 23.8 mpg on a trip I took the other day! Freaking amazing!

Also,




this is a crazy amount of flex for 33's without trimmed fenders. I never bottomed out on the fenders at all.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2016 | 01:21 PM
  #41  
88whitecomanche's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 7,378
Likes: 2
From: Miami, fl
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Beast! Anything over 20mph is awesome in a jeep...
It's crazy how gears make a huge difference...
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2016 | 01:21 PM
  #42  
88whitecomanche's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 7,378
Likes: 2
From: Miami, fl
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

double post delete

Last edited by 88whitecomanche; Jul 14, 2016 at 01:44 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2016 | 01:28 PM
  #43  
Cane's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 2
From: Quebec
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by poorboy76
I installed the 8.25 with Liberty discs, and the stopping is incredible! So much better than stock!
rear disc swap should offer no real braking gains over well adjusted drums, so your drums were probably not adjusted correctly. nice upgrade either way.

xj looks good!
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2016 | 11:36 PM
  #44  
poorboy76's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Arvada
Year: 1991
Model: Comanche (MJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by 88whitecomanche
Beast! Anything over 20mph is awesome in a jeep...
It's crazy how gears make a huge difference...
Efficiency has always been top priority with it. It's a daily driver first, and a wheeling rig second. I just never expected it to be even half this good!


Originally Posted by Cane
rear disc swap should offer no real braking gains over well adjusted drums, so your drums were probably not adjusted correctly. nice upgrade either way.

xj looks good!
Yeah I was left with the option to either rebuild the drum brakes or replace it all. Being that I hate drum setups, I went this way. But yeah, the only real gain is being able to change brakes easier. And thank you!
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2016 | 07:37 PM
  #45  
poorboy76's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Arvada
Year: 1991
Model: Comanche (MJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Here's a couple pictures of my last outing up Red Cone pass. I got one more trip in before class started! Hopefully I can get a few trips in this semester!














Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:11 AM.