Jeep Cherokee Mercedes Diesel
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bayview Idaho
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Jeep Cherokee Mercedes Diesel
89 Cherokee project with a 99 Mercedes 3.0 turbo diesel. Engine is adapted to the AX-15 transmission with a custom engine adapter. Front sheet metal is extended 4" for oil pan sump clearance. northwestdieseloffroad.com
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bayview Idaho
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Have more pictures on my web site, www.northwestdieseloffroad.com, Have some newer ones I can post here.
Last edited by zeeman; 06-29-2012 at 04:12 PM. Reason: mistake
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bayview Idaho
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
#7
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 5.2L V8
How fast is your rig with that in there? like 0-60 time/top speed, and also the towing capacity? Also, Seems like a cool build! Subscribed.
Trending Topics
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bayview Idaho
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Standard features will be:
Mercedes diesel conversion ( will run on Diesel, Biodiesel, WVO)
WVO conversion
4wheel disc brakes
Heavy duty D spoke wheels
Goodyear wrangler tires
150 amp alternator
110 volt inverter
Sony Am-FM- SW radio
CB radio
Custom front and rear bumpers ( air tanks)
Front winch
Skip plates
1 1/4" heavy wall tube roof rack
Solar panels on roof rack (alternative power)
Off road lites on roof rack
Fresh water tank.
Capable of towing a camp trailer
This is a prototype for a possible production run based on a 89-2001 Jeep Cherokee refurbished.
Last edited by zeeman; 06-26-2012 at 07:55 PM.
#11
I know the benefits to the OM606 but the om617 fits in perfect..no body mods or anything needed & is very very similar to the original 4.0.
Obviously the 617 is lacking in the performance department, but with the Ip cranked, 12psi, alda deleted, & a a w112? intake & 3" exhaust they can go pretty darn good. Why choose the 606 over the 617?
Obviously the 617 is lacking in the performance department, but with the Ip cranked, 12psi, alda deleted, & a a w112? intake & 3" exhaust they can go pretty darn good. Why choose the 606 over the 617?
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bayview Idaho
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
I know the benefits to the OM606 but the om617 fits in perfect..no body mods or anything needed & is very very similar to the original 4.0.
Obviously the 617 is lacking in the performance department, but with the Ip cranked, 12psi, alda deleted, & a a w112? intake & 3" exhaust they can go pretty darn good. Why choose the 606 over the 617?
Obviously the 617 is lacking in the performance department, but with the Ip cranked, 12psi, alda deleted, & a a w112? intake & 3" exhaust they can go pretty darn good. Why choose the 606 over the 617?
There is a web site www.superturbodiesel.com that has some killer modified 617 engines that would blow the doors off of a small block chevy.
#14
Seasoned Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: U.A.E
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
great job , but i drive 300-350 for one tank in my 4.0 5speed
how many miles do you think you can drive per tank ?
in my opinion not less than 450-500 !! with 20 G tank
how many miles do you think you can drive per tank ?
in my opinion not less than 450-500 !! with 20 G tank
#15
Well to be honest the Om617 is a tractor motor lol..more so than our 4.0's. Its a 5cly, and with the stock injector pump it will make around 250ftlbs max..after that you run out of fuel. At that point its time for meth injection or to have Myna? mod the IP (injector pump) for around 1500. And that will get you as much power you want! I prefer meth injection as it will make more power, keep the motor clean (think steam cleaning) & lower EGT's & IAT's.
Anyway they can achieve mid-high 20's...don't expect that much in a lifted jeep however I'd say 22-24mpg would be achievable..basically same jeep, with a 4.0 would probably get 18mpg, while the Om617 would get 20-25mpg. The benefits become alternative fueling & diesel being cheaper in most states..They call the Om617 a million mile motor. And I believe theres threads floating around where people have posted pictures of 900K
For me, I'd love to do the swap, it would better fit my expo rig & make it more appocalyse friendly...think bio-fuels!
But the 4.0 will go 500K, it will degrade & loose performance at that mileage, more so than a diesel would. In my case I would gain maybe 5mpg or so over the gas motor. Diesel is about the same & often more than gas in California. And it would cost me more to get a setup going to produce Bio-fuel. So I would probably be loosing in the end!
I choose to build a 4.2L high compression, high efficiency motor...I'm using the old 3.8L crank, will have a .0038" quench height, 9.8:1 comp, ported head, stock 87-95 single pattern cam advanced a few degrees to make it come alive sooner.
Its installed -8 degrees, or 8 degrees retarded. It comes alive around 2500rpm & holds power to around 6200rpm before it falls off. Advancing the cam to say -4 would make it come alive around 2000rpm hopefully & fall off around 5500rpm. We only rev to 5300rpm max, so it makes perfect since to do so
The 96-01 guys got the dual pattern cam, it comes on really strong from 1000-4000rpm..then falls flat around 4400rpm. I prefer the 87-95 cam that stays strong to 6200rpm because it can be advanced & you get the best of both worlds..redline power & low end torque!
Currently with a 2.5" OME lift, around 3" actual, 31's AT's & 3.55 gears with a ax15/np231. I'm cruising around 1950rpm at 65mph. 242k original motor, a few mods to help mileage & I'm getting 18mpg city & 22-24mpg city. I coast, watch lights ahead of me to catch them on green & draft when safely possible! So I wouldn't gain much!
Anyway they can achieve mid-high 20's...don't expect that much in a lifted jeep however I'd say 22-24mpg would be achievable..basically same jeep, with a 4.0 would probably get 18mpg, while the Om617 would get 20-25mpg. The benefits become alternative fueling & diesel being cheaper in most states..They call the Om617 a million mile motor. And I believe theres threads floating around where people have posted pictures of 900K
For me, I'd love to do the swap, it would better fit my expo rig & make it more appocalyse friendly...think bio-fuels!
But the 4.0 will go 500K, it will degrade & loose performance at that mileage, more so than a diesel would. In my case I would gain maybe 5mpg or so over the gas motor. Diesel is about the same & often more than gas in California. And it would cost me more to get a setup going to produce Bio-fuel. So I would probably be loosing in the end!
I choose to build a 4.2L high compression, high efficiency motor...I'm using the old 3.8L crank, will have a .0038" quench height, 9.8:1 comp, ported head, stock 87-95 single pattern cam advanced a few degrees to make it come alive sooner.
Its installed -8 degrees, or 8 degrees retarded. It comes alive around 2500rpm & holds power to around 6200rpm before it falls off. Advancing the cam to say -4 would make it come alive around 2000rpm hopefully & fall off around 5500rpm. We only rev to 5300rpm max, so it makes perfect since to do so
The 96-01 guys got the dual pattern cam, it comes on really strong from 1000-4000rpm..then falls flat around 4400rpm. I prefer the 87-95 cam that stays strong to 6200rpm because it can be advanced & you get the best of both worlds..redline power & low end torque!
Currently with a 2.5" OME lift, around 3" actual, 31's AT's & 3.55 gears with a ax15/np231. I'm cruising around 1950rpm at 65mph. 242k original motor, a few mods to help mileage & I'm getting 18mpg city & 22-24mpg city. I coast, watch lights ahead of me to catch them on green & draft when safely possible! So I wouldn't gain much!
Last edited by whiteXj2; 06-27-2012 at 03:38 AM.