Pro's and Con's, XJ Vs. ZJ
#1
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
Pro's and Con's, XJ Vs. ZJ
This may be the wrong thread for this, but i"m not sure where else to post it and I only have half an hour to post (I'm in Afghanistan).
My XJ's body was destroyed in transit by a freight company and my grandpa signed for it like an idiot.
My dad found a ZJ with a transmission problem for $750. I'm already aware that 75% of the stuff I have on my Cherokee will not carry over (bull bar, lift kit etc etc).
What are the disadvantages of a ZJ? (I will be keeping my engine and transmission+transfer case).
My XJ's body was destroyed in transit by a freight company and my grandpa signed for it like an idiot.
My dad found a ZJ with a transmission problem for $750. I'm already aware that 75% of the stuff I have on my Cherokee will not carry over (bull bar, lift kit etc etc).
What are the disadvantages of a ZJ? (I will be keeping my engine and transmission+transfer case).
#5
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
#6
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
More common to find electrical options on ZJs(windows, locks, etc.). And Jeeps don't have great track records with electrical parts, so they tend to break quite a bit.
#7
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
I had a limited cherokee with all of the electrical options anyways. I actually had to remove numerous fuses in it because they were acting up everytime I hit a bump. This would save me troubleshooting that.
Trending Topics
#8
CF Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 5,302
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes
on
16 Posts
Model: Cherokee
XJ...ZJ...Ya pays your money and ya takes your pick.
The ZJ's are a bit more street oriented, the interiors are more car-like IMHO, but still entirely capable offroad.
The XJ's were designed for function first, seem to have better aftermarket parts support and can be built into absolute crushers if you are so inclined.
I'm partial to most of **** Teague's designs...the XJ included. It's a timeless classic. But that's a subjective thing. For 99% of the owners who drive mostly on-road with some weekend trail riding, either one is a good choice. I don't think either is more/less reliable under those conditions.
Both have infamous Chrysler electronics, unless you really go back in time with the XJ and get the infamous AMC electronics, lol.
ps: if the bull bar is for sale...let's talk.
The ZJ's are a bit more street oriented, the interiors are more car-like IMHO, but still entirely capable offroad.
The XJ's were designed for function first, seem to have better aftermarket parts support and can be built into absolute crushers if you are so inclined.
I'm partial to most of **** Teague's designs...the XJ included. It's a timeless classic. But that's a subjective thing. For 99% of the owners who drive mostly on-road with some weekend trail riding, either one is a good choice. I don't think either is more/less reliable under those conditions.
Both have infamous Chrysler electronics, unless you really go back in time with the XJ and get the infamous AMC electronics, lol.
ps: if the bull bar is for sale...let's talk.
Last edited by Radi; 05-23-2012 at 12:52 AM.
#9
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
XJ...ZJ...Ya pays your money and ya takes your pick.
The ZJ's are a bit more street oriented, the interiors are more car-like IMHO, but still entirely capable offroad.
The XJ's were designed for function first, seem to have better aftermarket parts support and can be built into absolute crushers if you are so inclined.
I'm partial to most of **** Teague's designs...the XJ included. It's a timeless classic. But that's a subjective thing. For 99% of the owners who drive mostly on-road with some weekend trail riding, either one is a good choice. I don't think either is more/less reliable under those conditions.
Both have infamous Chrysler electronics, unless you really go back in time with the XJ and get the infamous AMC electronics, lol.
ps: if the bull bar is for sale...let's talk.
The ZJ's are a bit more street oriented, the interiors are more car-like IMHO, but still entirely capable offroad.
The XJ's were designed for function first, seem to have better aftermarket parts support and can be built into absolute crushers if you are so inclined.
I'm partial to most of **** Teague's designs...the XJ included. It's a timeless classic. But that's a subjective thing. For 99% of the owners who drive mostly on-road with some weekend trail riding, either one is a good choice. I don't think either is more/less reliable under those conditions.
Both have infamous Chrysler electronics, unless you really go back in time with the XJ and get the infamous AMC electronics, lol.
ps: if the bull bar is for sale...let's talk.
Something major I left out was that this ZJ has a V8. Anyone familiar with mounting an I6 in a V8's engine bay? I know some people put V8's in their cherokee so I would think it's possible, but I don't know if there is a kit that comes with mounts that makes it possible. I would doubt there is such a thing for converting a V8 to I6.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New IBeria La
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0l
#11
CF Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Pasadena, MD
Posts: 4,006
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 1987
Model: Wagoneer
Engine: Renix 4.0
dont forget that the zjs have cv joints on the axle shafts. my buddy had a v8 zj and it was constantly breaking them. the viscous coupler in the transfer case is crap. i sat in it and i personally didnt like it.
putting the I6 in a zj should be easy. i mean, zjs came with I6's and V8's so its a matter of swapping everything.
putting the I6 in a zj should be easy. i mean, zjs came with I6's and V8's so its a matter of swapping everything.
#12
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
dont forget that the zjs have cv joints on the axle shafts. my buddy had a v8 zj and it was constantly breaking them. the viscous coupler in the transfer case is crap. i sat in it and i personally didnt like it.
putting the I6 in a zj should be easy. i mean, zjs came with I6's and V8's so its a matter of swapping everything.
putting the I6 in a zj should be easy. i mean, zjs came with I6's and V8's so its a matter of swapping everything.
#13
THE Admin
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lantana, Fl
Posts: 34,036
Received 231 Likes
on
187 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.Slow
Originally Posted by Radi
XJ...ZJ...Ya pays your money and ya takes your pick.
The ZJ's are a bit more street oriented, the interiors are more car-like IMHO, but still entirely capable offroad.
The XJ's were designed for function first, seem to have better aftermarket parts support and can be built into absolute crushers if you are so inclined.
I'm partial to most of **** Teague's designs...the XJ included. It's a timeless classic. But that's a subjective thing. For 99% of the owners who drive mostly on-road with some weekend trail riding, either one is a good choice. I don't think either is more/less reliable under those conditions.
Both have infamous Chrysler electronics, unless you really go back in time with the XJ and get the infamous AMC electronics, lol.
ps: if the bull bar is for sale...let's talk.
#14
CF Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oroville, CA
Posts: 12,367
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes
on
18 Posts
Year: 1995
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 with all of the noise and clatter
ZJs don't have any more electrical problems than an XJ. The weak point of the ZJ is the transmission/transfercase depending on what t-case it has. If you have an NP249 (most common with the V8), then you may have problems with the viscous coupler. Not all ZJs have CV front axles, only the NP249 equiped ZJs have CV axles. Most of the front suspension on a ZJ is exactly like an XJ. The good things about the ZJ are you have less wind noise, more comfort, more room, easier to get in and out of, larger cooling system, and rear disc brakes on 94 and newer models. A ZJ can go anywhere an XJ will go, they work very very well off road. The down side of a ZJ would be less aftermarket support for bumpers and stuff like that, low pinion front axle, and no choice of rear axles without some fab work. Most ZJs on the market were adult owned and never abused or hacked up. A ZJ is a good choice if you're into trail riding and some moderate wheeling, but they can be built to do some hardcore stuff.
#15
CF Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Pasadena, MD
Posts: 4,006
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 1987
Model: Wagoneer
Engine: Renix 4.0
ZJs don't have any more electrical problems than an XJ. The weak point of the ZJ is the transmission/transfercase depending on what t-case it has. If you have an NP249 (most common with the V8), then you may have problems with the viscous coupler. Not all ZJs have CV front axles, only the NP249 equiped ZJs have CV axles. Most of the front suspension on a ZJ is exactly like an XJ. The good things about the ZJ are you have less wind noise, more comfort, more room, easier to get in and out of, larger cooling system, and rear disc brakes on 94 and newer models. A ZJ can go anywhere an XJ will go, they work very very well off road. The down side of a ZJ would be less aftermarket support for bumpers and stuff like that, low pinion front axle, and no choice of rear axles without some fab work. Most ZJs on the market were adult owned and never abused or hacked up. A ZJ is a good choice if you're into trail riding and some moderate wheeling, but they can be built to do some hardcore stuff.