Pro's and Con's, XJ Vs. ZJ
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 4
From: Florida
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.6 Re-Built Golen, 68-200-4 Comp Cam
This may be the wrong thread for this, but i"m not sure where else to post it and I only have half an hour to post (I'm in Afghanistan).
My XJ's body was destroyed in transit by a freight company and my grandpa signed for it like an idiot.
My dad found a ZJ with a transmission problem for $750. I'm already aware that 75% of the stuff I have on my Cherokee will not carry over (bull bar, lift kit etc etc).
What are the disadvantages of a ZJ? (I will be keeping my engine and transmission+transfer case).
My XJ's body was destroyed in transit by a freight company and my grandpa signed for it like an idiot.
My dad found a ZJ with a transmission problem for $750. I'm already aware that 75% of the stuff I have on my Cherokee will not carry over (bull bar, lift kit etc etc).
What are the disadvantages of a ZJ? (I will be keeping my engine and transmission+transfer case).
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 4
From: Florida
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.6 Re-Built Golen, 68-200-4 Comp Cam
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Bend, OR
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
More common to find electrical options on ZJs(windows, locks, etc.). And Jeeps don't have great track records with electrical parts, so they tend to break quite a bit.
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 4
From: Florida
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.6 Re-Built Golen, 68-200-4 Comp Cam
I had a limited cherokee with all of the electrical options anyways. I actually had to remove numerous fuses in it because they were acting up everytime I hit a bump. This would save me troubleshooting that.
Trending Topics
XJ...ZJ...Ya pays your money and ya takes your pick. 
The ZJ's are a bit more street oriented, the interiors are more car-like IMHO, but still entirely capable offroad.
The XJ's were designed for function first, seem to have better aftermarket parts support and can be built into absolute crushers if you are so inclined.
I'm partial to most of **** Teague's designs...the XJ included. It's a timeless classic. But that's a subjective thing. For 99% of the owners who drive mostly on-road with some weekend trail riding, either one is a good choice. I don't think either is more/less reliable under those conditions.
Both have infamous Chrysler electronics, unless you really go back in time with the XJ and get the infamous AMC electronics, lol.
ps: if the bull bar is for sale...let's talk.

The ZJ's are a bit more street oriented, the interiors are more car-like IMHO, but still entirely capable offroad.
The XJ's were designed for function first, seem to have better aftermarket parts support and can be built into absolute crushers if you are so inclined.
I'm partial to most of **** Teague's designs...the XJ included. It's a timeless classic. But that's a subjective thing. For 99% of the owners who drive mostly on-road with some weekend trail riding, either one is a good choice. I don't think either is more/less reliable under those conditions.
Both have infamous Chrysler electronics, unless you really go back in time with the XJ and get the infamous AMC electronics, lol.
ps: if the bull bar is for sale...let's talk.
Last edited by Radi; May 23, 2012 at 12:52 AM.
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 4
From: Florida
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.6 Re-Built Golen, 68-200-4 Comp Cam
XJ...ZJ...Ya pays your money and ya takes your pick. 
The ZJ's are a bit more street oriented, the interiors are more car-like IMHO, but still entirely capable offroad.
The XJ's were designed for function first, seem to have better aftermarket parts support and can be built into absolute crushers if you are so inclined.
I'm partial to most of **** Teague's designs...the XJ included. It's a timeless classic. But that's a subjective thing. For 99% of the owners who drive mostly on-road with some weekend trail riding, either one is a good choice. I don't think either is more/less reliable under those conditions.
Both have infamous Chrysler electronics, unless you really go back in time with the XJ and get the infamous AMC electronics, lol.
ps: if the bull bar is for sale...let's talk.

The ZJ's are a bit more street oriented, the interiors are more car-like IMHO, but still entirely capable offroad.
The XJ's were designed for function first, seem to have better aftermarket parts support and can be built into absolute crushers if you are so inclined.
I'm partial to most of **** Teague's designs...the XJ included. It's a timeless classic. But that's a subjective thing. For 99% of the owners who drive mostly on-road with some weekend trail riding, either one is a good choice. I don't think either is more/less reliable under those conditions.
Both have infamous Chrysler electronics, unless you really go back in time with the XJ and get the infamous AMC electronics, lol.
ps: if the bull bar is for sale...let's talk.
Something major I left out was that this ZJ has a V8. Anyone familiar with mounting an I6 in a V8's engine bay? I know some people put V8's in their cherokee so I would think it's possible, but I don't know if there is a kit that comes with mounts that makes it possible. I would doubt there is such a thing for converting a V8 to I6.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
From: New IBeria La
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0l
CF Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,006
Likes: 1
From: Pasadena, MD
Year: 1987
Model: Wagoneer
Engine: Renix 4.0
dont forget that the zjs have cv joints on the axle shafts. my buddy had a v8 zj and it was constantly breaking them. the viscous coupler in the transfer case is crap. i sat in it and i personally didnt like it.
putting the I6 in a zj should be easy. i mean, zjs came with I6's and V8's so its a matter of swapping everything.
putting the I6 in a zj should be easy. i mean, zjs came with I6's and V8's so its a matter of swapping everything.
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 4
From: Florida
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.6 Re-Built Golen, 68-200-4 Comp Cam
dont forget that the zjs have cv joints on the axle shafts. my buddy had a v8 zj and it was constantly breaking them. the viscous coupler in the transfer case is crap. i sat in it and i personally didnt like it.
putting the I6 in a zj should be easy. i mean, zjs came with I6's and V8's so its a matter of swapping everything.
putting the I6 in a zj should be easy. i mean, zjs came with I6's and V8's so its a matter of swapping everything.
CF ADMIN

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 34,088
Likes: 257
From: Lantana, Fl
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.Slow
Originally Posted by Radi
XJ...ZJ...Ya pays your money and ya takes your pick.

The ZJ's are a bit more street oriented, the interiors are more car-like IMHO, but still entirely capable offroad.
The XJ's were designed for function first, seem to have better aftermarket parts support and can be built into absolute crushers if you are so inclined.
I'm partial to most of **** Teague's designs...the XJ included. It's a timeless classic. But that's a subjective thing. For 99% of the owners who drive mostly on-road with some weekend trail riding, either one is a good choice. I don't think either is more/less reliable under those conditions.
Both have infamous Chrysler electronics, unless you really go back in time with the XJ and get the infamous AMC electronics, lol.
ps: if the bull bar is for sale...let's talk.
CF Veteran
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 12,367
Likes: 23
From: Oroville, CA
Year: 1995
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 with all of the noise and clatter
ZJs don't have any more electrical problems than an XJ. The weak point of the ZJ is the transmission/transfercase depending on what t-case it has. If you have an NP249 (most common with the V8), then you may have problems with the viscous coupler. Not all ZJs have CV front axles, only the NP249 equiped ZJs have CV axles. Most of the front suspension on a ZJ is exactly like an XJ. The good things about the ZJ are you have less wind noise, more comfort, more room, easier to get in and out of, larger cooling system, and rear disc brakes on 94 and newer models. A ZJ can go anywhere an XJ will go, they work very very well off road. The down side of a ZJ would be less aftermarket support for bumpers and stuff like that, low pinion front axle, and no choice of rear axles without some fab work. Most ZJs on the market were adult owned and never abused or hacked up. A ZJ is a good choice if you're into trail riding and some moderate wheeling, but they can be built to do some hardcore stuff.
CF Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,006
Likes: 1
From: Pasadena, MD
Year: 1987
Model: Wagoneer
Engine: Renix 4.0
ZJs don't have any more electrical problems than an XJ. The weak point of the ZJ is the transmission/transfercase depending on what t-case it has. If you have an NP249 (most common with the V8), then you may have problems with the viscous coupler. Not all ZJs have CV front axles, only the NP249 equiped ZJs have CV axles. Most of the front suspension on a ZJ is exactly like an XJ. The good things about the ZJ are you have less wind noise, more comfort, more room, easier to get in and out of, larger cooling system, and rear disc brakes on 94 and newer models. A ZJ can go anywhere an XJ will go, they work very very well off road. The down side of a ZJ would be less aftermarket support for bumpers and stuff like that, low pinion front axle, and no choice of rear axles without some fab work. Most ZJs on the market were adult owned and never abused or hacked up. A ZJ is a good choice if you're into trail riding and some moderate wheeling, but they can be built to do some hardcore stuff.



