Poor mans locker, using the break.
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Poor mans locker, using the break.
WAsnt sure how best to title this, but I want to talk about the idea of using the break to get traction when on wheel is spinning. The idea behind it is that the spinning wheel has no resistance, therefore the engine doesnt make enough torque to to spin the wheel with traction. Applying the break demands torque, with enough break demanding enough torque to spin the wheel with traction and then your moving again.
I tried this in a few feet of snow a few weeks ago when I got stuck and it worked pretty well.
What I was wondering was how does a rear locker affect the front. My thinking is that since the front and rear have a 100% lock when in 4WD, the front even with an open diff will get equal torque the locker rear gets. I'm not saying the front is now as good as the rear is locked but wouldnt the front wheels get significantly more torque then if the rear was open?
I tried this in a few feet of snow a few weeks ago when I got stuck and it worked pretty well.
What I was wondering was how does a rear locker affect the front. My thinking is that since the front and rear have a 100% lock when in 4WD, the front even with an open diff will get equal torque the locker rear gets. I'm not saying the front is now as good as the rear is locked but wouldnt the front wheels get significantly more torque then if the rear was open?
#2
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
The rear being locked shouldn't affect the front at all. The transfer case (at least in part time) sends an equal amount of torque to the front and back. A vehicle with open diffs in 4 wheel in traction limited situations only puts power to the ground with 2 wheels, one in the front and one in the back. This power is transmitted to the wheel with the least amount of traction. If you have a locker in the back you now have 3 wheels putting power to the ground. More traction, but you still only get 1 tire worth of traction in the front.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Your totally missing the point. The whole issue is that the power isn't transmitted to the wheel with th least grip. The engine doesn't create enough power to spin the stuck wheel. Pressing the break stops the spinning tire and demands more torque. Enough break and you get enough torque to spin the wheel with grip and you move.
#5
Senior Member
What your are looking for are called cutting brakes. These have been around for awile and work just as you describe. One tire is spinning with no traction while the other is on solid ground and by braking the spinning wheel the power is transfered to the wheel with traction. Basically it is poor mans traction control since it operates almost exactly the same way except traction control uses the abs to stop the wheel and cutting brakes are usually lever actuated.
Last edited by letsgomuddin; 03-13-2013 at 09:09 PM.
Trending Topics
#9
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
What your are looking for are called cutting brakes. These have been around for awile and work just as you describe. One tire is spinning with no traction while the other is on solid ground and by braking the spinning wheel the power is transfered to the wheel with traction. Basically it is poor mans traction control since it operates almost exactly the same way except traction control uses the abs to stop the wheel and cutting brakes are usually lever actuated.
Ok true this is more about why one tire spins on the same axle opposed to the other. Common belief is that the spinning tire is being over powered. But what I've read is that the spinning tires have no traction and put little load on the engine. Without load there is no power. The non spinning tires require more power to spin. By hitting the brakes you increase the load on the engine and make more power.
#11
::CF Moderator::
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Prescott, Az
Posts: 43,876
Received 1,526 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
#13
::CF Moderator::
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Prescott, Az
Posts: 43,876
Received 1,526 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Yes and when your stuck and spinning front and rear that torque is near zero. A locker in the rear increases the torque so the stuck tire has power to spin and you move. Say you need 100ftlb to spin the rear isn't that 100 ftlb to the front as well? 50/50 right? So the engine would produce 200 and send half front half rear no?
#15
::CF Moderator::
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Prescott, Az
Posts: 43,876
Received 1,526 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Yes and when your stuck and spinning front and rear that torque is near zero. A locker in the rear increases the torque so the stuck tire has power to spin and you move. Say you need 100ftlb to spin the rear isn't that 100 ftlb to the front as well? 50/50 right? So the engine would produce 200 and send half front half rear no?