Modified XJ Cherokee Tech XJ (84-01)
All modified tech questions. If it modifies your XJ beyond stock parts ask it here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why no Ford 9 inch swaps?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2017, 10:23 AM
  #1  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
Bugout4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default Why no Ford 9 inch swaps?

I see very very few efforts to swap out to Ford 9 inch rear differentials. Can someone share why there is very little discussion about this option? They are not a C clip diff, they are one of the strongest, all the optional ratios can be had, limited slip carriers are everywhere for these, and they produced axles in both spline counts with the 5 on 4.5 bolt pattern. So why not?
Old 10-18-2017, 10:37 AM
  #2  
Seasoned Member
 
Joshua White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Dunedin FL
Posts: 483
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

I'd imagine it comes down to the work needed for a fullsize axle to fit properly. If you have to go through all that work you might as well grab what's more readily available? Or perhaps stronger for an intended purpose.

Having never needed that much beef all of this is pure speculation on my part. The guys over at BleepinJeep on the YouTubes did a nine inch build for an XJ and it was pretty popular.
Old 10-18-2017, 10:55 AM
  #3  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
Bugout4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Joshua White
I'd imagine it comes down to the work needed for a fullsize axle to fit properly. If you have to go through all that work you might as well grab what's more readily available? Or perhaps stronger for an intended purpose.

Having never needed that much beef all of this is pure speculation on my part. The guys over at BleepinJeep on the YouTubes did a nine inch build for an XJ and it was pretty popular.
I'll have to do some measuring but they made two different housing widths and axle lengths in both spline counts in both the "Big" bearing and "small" bearing sizes. One of the two has got to be real close to these. And all the guts are interchangeable between them all. From all the abuse I have seen these take over the years I can testify they are pretty much bulletproof. So I had to wonder why more haven't done it.
Old 10-18-2017, 12:44 PM
  #4  
CF Veteran
 
Tbone289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SEMO
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0 L6
Default

Originally Posted by Bugout4x4
I'll have to do some measuring but they made two different housing widths and axle lengths in both spline counts in both the "Big" bearing and "small" bearing sizes.
I have a small bearing 9 on my early Bronco, which is one of the narrower ones, but has the wrong bolt circle (5x5.5). See here for the details : http://www.mustangsandmore.com/ubb/F...imensions.html

Last edited by Tbone289; 10-18-2017 at 12:47 PM.
Old 10-18-2017, 01:11 PM
  #5  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
Bugout4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Tbone289
I have a small bearing 9 on my early Bronco, which is one of the narrower ones, but has the wrong bolt circle (5x5.5). See here for the details : http://www.mustangsandmore.com/ubb/F...imensions.html
I'm familiar with the bolt patterns, They actually had three different bolt patterns with the smallest being 5x4.5 like the jeep. For a while they had a chevy sized 5x5.75 pattern on the station wagons, T birds, LTDs, and some larger Mercurys. And they made two different width housings and two different spline counts and axle lengths in all three bolt patterns. And the internals were mix and match exchangeable in the three different wheel patterns. I'm pretty sure one can be pieced together to fit the XJ application. (except for spring perches of course, which would have to be fitted and welded)
Old 10-18-2017, 01:16 PM
  #6  
CF Veteran
 
Tbone289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SEMO
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0 L6
Default

According to that link there were more than 2 widths of housings. In don't know much about them except for the Bronco--just going by what I read there.
Old 10-18-2017, 01:22 PM
  #7  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
Bugout4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Tbone289
According to that link there were more than 2 widths of housings. In don't know much about them except for the Bronco--just going by what I read there.
Actually I think you are right. I think over the years they did use three different width housings. Have you measured yours against the jeep? I have a 58 f150 here I was about to go measure against the Jeep. Waiting for my "other end of the tape holder" to get back. lol
Old 10-18-2017, 01:34 PM
  #8  
CF Veteran
 
Tbone289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SEMO
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0 L6
Default

Other site states that it came in 7(!) housing widths: https://pitstopusa.com/p-4125-ford-9...formation.html

I believe the 8.25 is 60" flange-to-flange, and the 9" in the Bronco is 58".
Old 10-18-2017, 01:49 PM
  #9  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
Bugout4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Tbone289
Other site states that it came in 7(!) housing widths: https://pitstopusa.com/p-4125-ford-9...formation.html

I believe the 8.25 is 60" flange-to-flange, and the 9" in the Bronco is 58".
Holy cow! I really did not realize there were so many different housings! And I have been a Ford man all my life! lol

See, now I could live with 1 inch a side difference. I have a later model T bird rear axle here I will measure also. I think they are a little wider than the trucks believe it or not. Because they were a low and wide four link coil set up.

Last edited by Bugout4x4; 10-20-2017 at 07:05 AM.
Old 10-18-2017, 02:12 PM
  #10  
CF Veteran
 
4.3L XJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Chico, CA
Posts: 6,551
Received 480 Likes on 412 Posts
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.3L with headers and full 3" exhaust system
Default

Yes, there were many different widths over the years depending on year and model. It was gradually replaced with the 8.8. Also as stated above, there were two different size of axle bearings. The small bearing can fail under hard use or towing (had this happen twice). But that is no different than knowing which 8.25 Jeep axle to use. They are a good rear end and if you want to go full width go well with the Dana 44 front from a pick up or bronco.
Old 10-18-2017, 02:14 PM
  #11  
CF Veteran
 
Tbone289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SEMO
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0 L6
Default

Originally Posted by Bugout4x4
I have been a Ford man all my life!
Me too. My father has sold Fords for 59 years. He's still in the business at 80. The XJ is the only non-Ford I've ever owned, but I love it.

IIRC, the truck/Bronco housings are thicker than the others, but it's not going to matter much under a 3.3K LB XJ.
Old 10-18-2017, 02:33 PM
  #12  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
Bugout4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Tbone289
Me too. My father has sold Fords for 59 years. He's still in the business at 80. The XJ is the only non-Ford I've ever owned, but I love it.

IIRC, the truck/Bronco housings are thicker than the others, but it's not going to matter much under a 3.3K LB XJ.
I have owned a lot of other makes over the years, but they were all pre-80's. Never owned another make made after the 70's. JUNK. lol

I have a full spooled Bronco II sitting out back as we speak. The engine is about done in it from hard wheeling for years. So... I have a Nissan Diesel to drop in it after I first get the Jeep back up and going hopefully soon. But even though the Bronco II will go where this jeep could never think of going, I like that the Jeep is long enough to sleep in. lol
Old 10-18-2017, 03:24 PM
  #13  
aka Wade-O
 
89eliminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: IN
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Year: 1989 Comanche
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

lots of people run a 44/9 combo. thats what i run.
Old 10-18-2017, 03:42 PM
  #14  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
Bugout4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by 89eliminator
lots of people run a 44/9 combo. thats what i run.
Fantastic! Do you mind sharing what housing application and axle application you went with? And what dimension differences are there to the XJ?

Here's the deal... I have a corporate that is wore out and have access to all the 9 inch take outs I could ever need. I could spend the same on this Corporate and a lunch box or fab a 9 inch limited slip in it and spend less to gear it 3.55 to match the front. And the 9" is unbreakable as you know...

Any wisdom and experience you could spare with this swap option would be fantastic man!
Old 10-18-2017, 06:04 PM
  #15  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
Bugout4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by 89eliminator
lots of people run a 44/9 combo. thats what i run.
I would like to pursue this some more.... ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 PM.