S10 vs Durango steering box
#1
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Year: 2000 shell
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 1998 4.0l I6
S10 vs Durango steering box
Yes I searched before posting
I keep reading, through out numerous XJ groups on facebook,(yes facebook ) that a 95+ S10 gear box is better to swap in than the durango box. Now having bought my first XJ this past October, which I soberly totaled on the 4th Im wondering if this is true as I begin to search for my next one and start brainstorming for its build up. Whats the consensus, i know there is alot more knowledge here than there
I keep reading, through out numerous XJ groups on facebook,(yes facebook ) that a 95+ S10 gear box is better to swap in than the durango box. Now having bought my first XJ this past October, which I soberly totaled on the 4th Im wondering if this is true as I begin to search for my next one and start brainstorming for its build up. Whats the consensus, i know there is alot more knowledge here than there
#3
I have not used a s10 box yet so I cant comment, I personally would not use a Durango box again, they are a bit bigger but the turning radius blows & you have to space it off the uni frame...
Last two times I replaced a box I used a stock zj, the pitman arm is a bit lower so it works out well on a xj & the turning radius is great...They last two years or so on 35's haha.
Last two times I replaced a box I used a stock zj, the pitman arm is a bit lower so it works out well on a xj & the turning radius is great...They last two years or so on 35's haha.
#5
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Year: 2000 shell
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 1998 4.0l I6
OK so pros and cons
Durango pros
Beefier, everywhere
Cons
Bigger spacer, less turning radius
S10 pros
Maybe a bit less radius.
Cons
Unknown
Zj pros
Handles 35s for 2 years time, longer pitman arm
Cons
Unknown
Help me fill in the blanks guys I've never used either and it'll be going in a dd/expo rig with a max of 35" tires
Help me fill in the blanks
Durango pros
Beefier, everywhere
Cons
Bigger spacer, less turning radius
S10 pros
Maybe a bit less radius.
Cons
Unknown
Zj pros
Handles 35s for 2 years time, longer pitman arm
Cons
Unknown
Help me fill in the blanks guys I've never used either and it'll be going in a dd/expo rig with a max of 35" tires
Help me fill in the blanks
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: archbald pa
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 ho
I've been running the zr2 from a 01 s10 also a wj pump from a 02 so far no issue's. Actually I love it lol. When the s10 box goes I'm gonna try the j10 box.
#9
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Andover, VT
Posts: 2,970
Received 224 Likes
on
174 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0 L
Forget the s10 and Durango boxes. Keep the stock one until it's shot. I've heard people trying j10/j20 boxes but there's a ton of wrong info out there.
The tried and true one that I would do is a Saginaw (sp?) box out of a yj. 4 bolt holes instead of 3.
Either that or you could tap the factory box for hydro-assist
The tried and true one that I would do is a Saginaw (sp?) box out of a yj. 4 bolt holes instead of 3.
Either that or you could tap the factory box for hydro-assist
#12
they all have noticeable difference, the other boxes are stronger than the stock xj/zj box, but have compromises....
check out the redneck ram if you want a budget alternative to a hydro assist...http://westtexasoffroad.homestead.com/index.html
I simply stated that a zj box & pitman arm is set up better for a lifted jeep because the pitman arm is 1-1.5" lower than the stock xj.... At this point I would just rather buy that box every few years than compromise lock to lock steering or have to deal with a non street legal steering.
#13
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Year: 2000 shell
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 1998 4.0l I6
they all have noticeable difference, the other boxes are stronger than the stock xj/zj box, but have compromises....
check out the redneck ram if you want a budget alternative to a hydro assist...http://westtexasoffroad.homestead.com/index.html
I simply stated that a zj box & pitman arm is set up better for a lifted jeep because the pitman arm is 1-1.5" lower than the stock xj.... At this point I would just rather buy that box every few years than compromise lock to lock steering or have to deal with a non street legal steering.
check out the redneck ram if you want a budget alternative to a hydro assist...http://westtexasoffroad.homestead.com/index.html
I simply stated that a zj box & pitman arm is set up better for a lifted jeep because the pitman arm is 1-1.5" lower than the stock xj.... At this point I would just rather buy that box every few years than compromise lock to lock steering or have to deal with a non street legal steering.
#14
yes they are interchangeable....zj just sits a inch or so lower.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dyno89
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
7
09-13-2015 02:23 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)