Rock Krawler 3 link long arm
#1
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,405
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Rock Krawler 3 link long arm
Anybody even run the RK 3 link on a 2.5 inch lift? Clearance issues? I only have 2 inches of up travel so unless its really close clearance wise I could make it work. I could add another inch of lift if necessary but I like it low...lol
#4
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: west chester, pa
Posts: 19,216
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
35 Posts
Year: 1999
Engine: 4.0
I called RK a while ago, they said it was designed for 4-6 inches of lift, and any less than that would cause clearance issues, mainly because of the bend on the lowers.
I can imagine if u had straight lowers, it may work fine.
I can imagine if u had straight lowers, it may work fine.
#5
Seasoned Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Yuma
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0, APN header & 2.5" exhaust
I would take RK's word for it and have a minimum of 4" lift. The upper arm on the driver side really tucks up in there. I could take a picture of how it sits at 8 inches of that helps you any
#6
Junior Member
I have that kit on my Jeep without about 4 inches of lift. Iirc, I had no problem setting my Jeep on full bump with would be the equivalent of about 2.5" of lift.
Granted, if may bottom out right past that.
Like has been said, the only issue you MIGHT have is that the lower links are bent up. If they were straight then you'd be good to go.
Granted, if may bottom out right past that.
Like has been said, the only issue you MIGHT have is that the lower links are bent up. If they were straight then you'd be good to go.
Trending Topics
#8
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,405
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
I have that kit on my Jeep without about 4 inches of lift. Iirc, I had no problem setting my Jeep on full bump with would be the equivalent of about 2.5" of lift.
Granted, if may bottom out right past that.
Like has been said, the only issue you MIGHT have is that the lower links are bent up. If they were straight then you'd be good to go.
Granted, if may bottom out right past that.
Like has been said, the only issue you MIGHT have is that the lower links are bent up. If they were straight then you'd be good to go.
#10
CF Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Burlington, NC
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Year: 1994...mostly...
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0L I6 HO, Lot's of Bolt Ons
I'll be watching this thread, have the same debate over the RK 3 link or rusts comp 4 link. Leaning heavily toward RK 3 link for me. Rustys is not known for using the best joints in his builds.
For me I think of it this way, if your going to see more trail than road go with the 3 link. if you want the best ride quality go with the 4 link.
For me I think of it this way, if your going to see more trail than road go with the 3 link. if you want the best ride quality go with the 4 link.
#11
#12
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1990
Engine: 4.0
Is this what you are referring to as the RK 3 link? http://www.rockkrawler.com/ProductDe...=RKXJXF-LA-UPG
#13
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,405
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Is this what you are referring to as the RK 3 link? http://www.rockkrawler.com/ProductDe...=RKXJXF-LA-UPG
#14
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Yorba Linda
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.8
#15
Junior Member