Modified XJ Cherokee Tech XJ (84-01)
All modified tech questions. If it modifies your XJ beyond stock parts ask it here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Hydrogen Conversion Kit

Old Sep 20, 2008 | 08:12 PM
  #1  
JessieJeep's Avatar
Thread Starter
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 L
Default Hydrogen Conversion Kit

I've head that a Hydrogen Conversion Kit works GREAT in the cherokees. Anyone know anything about them?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2008 | 08:18 PM
  #2  
JeepersCreepers's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by JessieJeep
I've head that a Hydrogen Conversion Kit works GREAT in the cherokees. Anyone know anything about them?
I think add on hydrogen conversions is a load of crap. Mythbusters did an episode on how to get more gas mileage and they tested the hydrogen fuel cell and it didnt work.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2008 | 09:25 PM
  #3  
cheapJeeper's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Mythbusters did an episode on how to get more gas mileage and they tested the hydrogen fuel cell and it didnt work.

Those guys are my heroes...they have the coolest jobs EVER!
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2008 | 09:28 PM
  #4  
JeepersCreepers's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by cheapJeeper
Mythbusters did an episode on how to get more gas mileage and they tested the hydrogen fuel cell and it didnt work.

Those guys are my heroes...they have the coolest jobs EVER!
I would think that if anyone can get a hydrogen fuel cell to work it would be those guys but they didnt.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2008 | 09:29 PM
  #5  
whowey's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,237
Likes: 3
From: Northern Illinois
Year: 90
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by JeepersCreepers
I would think that if anyone can get a hydrogen fuel cell to work it would be those guys but they didnt.
Popular Mechanics couldn't get it do anything either.....
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2008 | 09:33 PM
  #6  
JeepersCreepers's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by whowey
Popular Mechanics couldn't get it do anything either.....
really.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2008 | 11:04 PM
  #7  
00XJsport's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 644
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
Default

I know a guy that did it on his ford excort zx2 and he said it works great
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2008 | 11:21 PM
  #8  
JeepersCreepers's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by 00XJsport
I know a guy that did it on his ford excort zx2 and he said it works great
i think it mind over matter. It been proven by experts that those kits dont work
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2008 | 11:23 PM
  #9  
00XJsport's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 644
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
Default

Yeah, i havent seen the expert proof but im just going by his words
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2008 | 11:56 PM
  #10  
jekyllrider's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 262
Likes: 1
From: PSL FL
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

From everything I read results seems to vary ALOT from kit to kit and vehicle to vehicle and most of the time they dont do much. Alot of it has to do with kits that dont produce that much gas and computer systems in the vehicle that simply compensate for any fuel savings by dumping in more gas to keep a consistant fuel/air(gas) mixture. The computer knows what is best for the engine and you have to 'trick' it for the system to work.

At least thats what Ive observed from other peoples experiments.......
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 02:47 AM
  #11  
CHERO-NEWBIE's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 High Output
Default

Originally Posted by whowey
Popular Mechanics couldn't get it do anything either.....
Guys! just think, if they did "get it to work" what would happen to your economy???? so of course they didnt get it to work. What makes their "failure" so suspicious is that even a kid with basic mechanical skill can "get it to work". I have blown up may baloons, and plastic bags etc etc sooooo believe me IT WORKS! question is, can it be used efficiently as a gas additive? now THERE is the myth! and THAT is what they should have tested! I am running one on my jeep, I will post results. Does it make hydrogen...HELL YES! is it explosive....HELL YES! VERY!........does your jeep run better....YES!....does your jeep run cooler....YES!....does it save you fuel?....MMMM DONT KNOW YET... WILL LET YOU ALL KNOW! p.s see my other posts on this subject, I can send you all plans on how to make one, and test it yourselves! Im bust making a welder from it too, it works great, but then it blows my generator to bits.....I need to work on my flash back arrestor (parts are hard to come by here in south africa)
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 02:58 AM
  #12  
CHERO-NEWBIE's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 High Output
Default

Originally Posted by jekyllrider
From everything I read results seems to vary ALOT from kit to kit and vehicle to vehicle and most of the time they dont do much. Alot of it has to do with kits that dont produce that much gas and computer systems in the vehicle that simply compensate for any fuel savings by dumping in more gas to keep a consistant fuel/air(gas) mixture. The computer knows what is best for the engine and you have to 'trick' it for the system to work.

At least thats what Ive observed from other peoples experiments.......
you are absolutely correct! I have built a MAP enhancer too, question is.....are the gains from the gas...or from the leaner settings? I am testing one right now...ill let you know
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2009 | 09:38 PM
  #13  
whowey's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,237
Likes: 3
From: Northern Illinois
Year: 90
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by CHERO-NEWBIE
Guys! just think, if they did "get it to work" what would happen to your economy???? so of course they didnt get it to work. What makes their "failure" so suspicious is that even a kid with basic mechanical skill can "get it to work". I have blown up may baloons, and plastic bags etc etc sooooo believe me IT WORKS! question is, can it be used efficiently as a gas additive? now THERE is the myth! and THAT is what they should have tested! I am running one on my jeep, I will post results. Does it make hydrogen...HELL YES! is it explosive....HELL YES! VERY!........does your jeep run better....YES!....does your jeep run cooler....YES!....does it save you fuel?....MMMM DONT KNOW YET... WILL LET YOU ALL KNOW! p.s see my other posts on this subject, I can send you all plans on how to make one, and test it yourselves! Im bust making a welder from it too, it works great, but then it blows my generator to bits.....I need to work on my flash back arrestor (parts are hard to come by here in south africa)
Guess I should have been more clear... PM couldn't get it to increase the fuel milage of their test car on their more than generous test track conditions. I have read the other thread and I am waiting for verifiable proof from credible sources. I haven't seen any.. You have said you increased your parasitic drag by increasing the amount of amperage drawn from your alternator(unless the SA version of the XJ still uses a generator). That is only going to increase as you increase the amount of energy used. Also increasing weight with a larger electrolyte tank doesn't help you.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2009 | 10:23 PM
  #14  
4.3L XJ's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,588
Likes: 495
From: Chico, CA
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.3L with headers and full 3" exhaust system
Default

Originally Posted by whowey
Guess I should have been more clear... PM couldn't get it to increase the fuel milage of their test car on their more than generous test track conditions. I have read the other thread and I am waiting for verifiable proof from credible sources. I haven't seen any.. You have said you increased your parasitic drag by increasing the amount of amperage drawn from your alternator(unless the SA version of the XJ still uses a generator). That is only going to increase as you increase the amount of energy used. Also increasing weight with a larger electrolyte tank doesn't help you.
That is a question I have about it. In theory you are breaking an ionic molecular bond and then reestablishing it. In theory it takes the same energy to do both things. So there is no gain.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2009 | 12:25 AM
  #15  
thelaststarfighter13's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: I'm bad, I'm nationwide.
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by 4.3L XJ
That is a question I have about it. In theory you are breaking an ionic molecular bond and then reestablishing it. In theory it takes the same energy to do both things. So there is no gain.
I believe it's called unity theory. I'm not sure how it works in this situation because you are using it to help an existing reaction to be more efficient. Your not really running the vehicle on Brown's Gas. It flames so much hotter and quicker that it makes sure you get every drop of energy from your gasoline.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 PM.