Axle Swaps
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Axle Swaps
I am planning on turning my stock 1998 xj into a nice wheelin xj. My plan is to put Clayton 8" 3-link suspension and also convert my leaf into coils also apart of the Clayton kit but my main questions is about the axles. At first I thought I was just going to change my rear to ford 8.8 axle but then I worried about my front too, and if I was going to need to swap it too. My goal is to run 35's, I want it to be able to drive nice on the highway and also be able to handle difficult off-road too. What axle do you guys suggest for both front and rear axle and also could you provide sort of like tutorials for the swaps too. Thank you
#2
CF Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Soddy Daisy TN
Posts: 5,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
All depends on what you have now and what kind of terrain you plan on wheeling. A stock D30 with the larger joints that came in the later models and a 8.25 will hold 35s all day long. I personally don't care for the 8.8 mostly because I can't see swapping a c-clip axle for another c-clip axle and it hangs pretty low and for the same price if not cheaper you can get a D44 or ford 9" which doesn't have the c-clips and can be built stronger.
Also that's a ton of lift for 35s, I'm running about 7" and 38s just for reference.
Also that's a ton of lift for 35s, I'm running about 7" and 38s just for reference.
#5
CF Veteran
Join Date: May 2011
Location: va
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: i-6 4.0
Imo do a old waggy front and a 8.8 with a c clip elm and aloy shafts in both with a truss, its what I'm saveing for/working for... ~ 1200 rear a little more front...
#7
CF Veteran
Join Date: May 2011
Location: va
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: i-6 4.0
Originally Posted by Jeepineasy
Dang I spend 300 on my d44 and 9. Plan on spending 1500 for lockers, gears, rebuild kits etc....
Well the 44/ 9" are the best stock combo for the xj, there is no fighting with that fact. That said they are full width axles, and as such they take away the good looks of the jeep (IMHO) its great on the trail, you won't break them but there not for me.
Side note, the 8.8 is close to the Dana 60 in stock form...
So my plan is to run an 8.8 ($150)with c- clip elem and 31 aloy shafts ($650) putting it close to stock, (less then an inch) and strong as s*** then add hd brackets and truss($200) and it adds up... But I get to keep my wheels (just bought new) and stock width....
Dana 44....
Now the 44 as not a lot larger ring gear than the 30... SO... I may do the 8.8 and gear the 8.8 and the 30 and save for a cut down custom 60 or 14 bolt, maybe even a rock jock, but for now I just want the 8.8 33"s all day or 35's with a easy foot
Last edited by jeepsurfer1; 08-04-2012 at 11:07 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Take this with a grain of salt....
Well the 44/ 9" are the best stock combo for the xj, there is no fighting with that fact. That said they are full width axles, and as such they take away the good looks of the jeep (IMHO) its great on the trail, you won't break them but there not for me.
Side note, the 8.8 is close to the Dana 60 in stock form...
So my plan is to run an 8.8 ($150)with c- clip elem and 31 aloy shafts ($650) putting it close to stock, (less then an inch) and strong as s*** then add hd brackets and truss and it adds up... But I get to keep my wheels (just bought new) and stock width....
Well the 44/ 9" are the best stock combo for the xj, there is no fighting with that fact. That said they are full width axles, and as such they take away the good looks of the jeep (IMHO) its great on the trail, you won't break them but there not for me.
Side note, the 8.8 is close to the Dana 60 in stock form...
So my plan is to run an 8.8 ($150)with c- clip elem and 31 aloy shafts ($650) putting it close to stock, (less then an inch) and strong as s*** then add hd brackets and truss and it adds up... But I get to keep my wheels (just bought new) and stock width....
If the op went full width and doesn't like the wide look he can get rims that will suck the tires in.... I had h1 bead locks that had 7" back spacing a and tires barely stuck out
#9
CF Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: La Habra, CA
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 1988
Engine: 4.0 RENIX
incorrect.
the small one is actually a dana 35 ring gear, but this is the only pic if have. so the d30 ring gear is actually smaller than that.
also, why do you think that an 8.8 can only handle 35s with light throttle? it can surely handle more than that, you even said its comparable to a dana 60. its the dana 30 you should be worried about
the small one is actually a dana 35 ring gear, but this is the only pic if have. so the d30 ring gear is actually smaller than that.
also, why do you think that an 8.8 can only handle 35s with light throttle? it can surely handle more than that, you even said its comparable to a dana 60. its the dana 30 you should be worried about
#10
CF Veteran
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Glen Burnie, MD
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 H.O. K&N, Borla headers, custom down pipe, magnaflow hi-flo cat, flowmaster to turn down tip
oh and btw, the 8.8 is no where near Dana 60 strength. it is barely d44 in stock form, and with upgraded shafts and c-clip eliminator, it is comparable. it is not all about the ring gear size...mostly, but not always.
#12
CF Veteran
Join Date: May 2011
Location: va
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: i-6 4.0
Originally Posted by CheapCherokee
incorrect.
the small one is actually a dana 35 ring gear, but this is the only pic if have. so the d30 ring gear is actually smaller than that.
also, why do you think that an 8.8 can only handle 35s with light throttle? it can surely handle more than that, you even said its comparable to a dana 60. its the dana 30 you should be worried about
#13
CF Veteran
Join Date: May 2011
Location: va
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: i-6 4.0
oh and btw, the 8.8 is no where near Dana 60 strength. it is barely d44 in stock form, and with upgraded shafts and c-clip eliminator, it is comparable. it is not all about the ring gear size...mostly, but not always.[/QUOTE]
With a grain of salt... Nice
It's my thoughts backed by studys and what I plan to do I'm not puting it on yours or anyone eleses rigs but for my misinformation...
COT: Continuous output torque rating
MOT: Maximum output torque rating
-------------------------------
Dana 35 rear axle COT: 870 MOT: 3480
Dana 44 rear axle COT: 1100 MOT: 4460
Ford 8.8 28spline COT: 1250 MOT: 4600
Ford 8.8 31spline COT: 1360 MOT: 5100
Dana60 semifloat COT: 1500 MOT: 5500
I go by hard facts, in a perfect world this is what counts, but experience is always a curve ball...
Good 8.8 info site BTW... http://www.virtualjeepclub.com/archi...p/t-71652.html
With a grain of salt... Nice
It's my thoughts backed by studys and what I plan to do I'm not puting it on yours or anyone eleses rigs but for my misinformation...
COT: Continuous output torque rating
MOT: Maximum output torque rating
-------------------------------
Dana 35 rear axle COT: 870 MOT: 3480
Dana 44 rear axle COT: 1100 MOT: 4460
Ford 8.8 28spline COT: 1250 MOT: 4600
Ford 8.8 31spline COT: 1360 MOT: 5100
Dana60 semifloat COT: 1500 MOT: 5500
I go by hard facts, in a perfect world this is what counts, but experience is always a curve ball...
Good 8.8 info site BTW... http://www.virtualjeepclub.com/archi...p/t-71652.html
Last edited by jeepsurfer1; 08-05-2012 at 07:09 AM.
#14
CF Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Smiths Station, Al
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
10 Posts
Year: 87
Model: Wagoneer
Engine: 4.0 I6
Reading your first post is all well and good. But the big question first is how much money you got to put in it. From stock to what you want can run about 5 grand and that is with some used and some new. Not trying to poop on your parade but reality is why you see most of us at 3-4.5in lift with 31's to 33's.
Good luck i have seen plenty of built rigs with the setup you want for sale from 4500- 7500 also. That would almost be easier to get and swap everything over.
Good luck i have seen plenty of built rigs with the setup you want for sale from 4500- 7500 also. That would almost be easier to get and swap everything over.
#15
CF Veteran
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Glen Burnie, MD
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 H.O. K&N, Borla headers, custom down pipe, magnaflow hi-flo cat, flowmaster to turn down tip
With a grain of salt... Nice
It's my thoughts backed by studys and what I plan to do I'm not puting it on yours or anyone eleses rigs but for my misinformation...
COT: Continuous output torque rating
MOT: Maximum output torque rating
-------------------------------
Dana 35 rear axle COT: 870 MOT: 3480
Dana 44 rear axle COT: 1100 MOT: 4460
Ford 8.8 28spline COT: 1250 MOT: 4600
Ford 8.8 31spline COT: 1360 MOT: 5100
Dana60 semifloat COT: 1500 MOT: 5500
I go by hard facts, in a perfect world this is what counts, but experience is always a curve ball...
It's my thoughts backed by studys and what I plan to do I'm not puting it on yours or anyone eleses rigs but for my misinformation...
COT: Continuous output torque rating
MOT: Maximum output torque rating
-------------------------------
Dana 35 rear axle COT: 870 MOT: 3480
Dana 44 rear axle COT: 1100 MOT: 4460
Ford 8.8 28spline COT: 1250 MOT: 4600
Ford 8.8 31spline COT: 1360 MOT: 5100
Dana60 semifloat COT: 1500 MOT: 5500
I go by hard facts, in a perfect world this is what counts, but experience is always a curve ball...
so in the end, it is choice, but dont flood these guys heads with number, the 8.8 is still no where near Dana 60 strength even in modified form.
and in a "perfect world" you would drive in a strait line, never articulate, and never wheel your axle. please dont throw statistics at people with no experience of your own.