05 Liberty 8.25 in my 01 XJ
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Whitefish, MT
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
05 Liberty 8.25 in my 01 XJ
Has anyone done this swap? I have an opportunity to pick one up cheap from a JY. The guy told me it was a d35 with discs. I have a d35 and just wanted the discs. I got there to look at it and it's an 8.25 but it had some things on it I couldn't identify
What is that cylinder on the right?
What is that cylinder on the right?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Hmmmm ......you would have to change the pinion yoke.... and the Axle shafts are longer in a Liberty, so I am guessing the axle is wider.
Also what Cylinder are you talking about these?
If so some quick Google research finds it is called a Pinion Yoke Damper, I am not sure what it does, but I am guessing to cut on vibrations or something.
Also what Cylinder are you talking about these?
If so some quick Google research finds it is called a Pinion Yoke Damper, I am not sure what it does, but I am guessing to cut on vibrations or something.
#6
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
But the Liberty swap is just that. No monkeying around with a dremel.
And up here in the rust belt older ZJs are getting harder to find. The backing plates off a ZJ are no longer available.
So you are getting a braking system with newer parts availability.
The only problem I had was that the brake lines fittings are metric while the XJ are Imperial. An adapter fitting took care of that. Napa has them.
And up here in the rust belt older ZJs are getting harder to find. The backing plates off a ZJ are no longer available.
So you are getting a braking system with newer parts availability.
The only problem I had was that the brake lines fittings are metric while the XJ are Imperial. An adapter fitting took care of that. Napa has them.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Year: 2001, 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
If ZJ parts aren't available in your area then it may be worth it to get the axle for the brake parts. But you wouldn't want to swap the axle entirely. Leafs vs coils, etc, etc...
Trending Topics
#8
CF Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: new mexico
Posts: 1,874
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 88
Engine: 4.0
But the Liberty swap is just that. No monkeying around with a dremel.
And up here in the rust belt older ZJs are getting harder to find. The backing plates off a ZJ are no longer available.
So you are getting a braking system with newer parts availability.
The only problem I had was that the brake lines fittings are metric while the XJ are Imperial. An adapter fitting took care of that. Napa has them.
And up here in the rust belt older ZJs are getting harder to find. The backing plates off a ZJ are no longer available.
So you are getting a braking system with newer parts availability.
The only problem I had was that the brake lines fittings are metric while the XJ are Imperial. An adapter fitting took care of that. Napa has them.
#9
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: west chester, pa
Posts: 19,216
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
35 Posts
Year: 1999
Engine: 4.0
But the Liberty swap is just that. No monkeying around with a dremel. And up here in the rust belt older ZJs are getting harder to find. The backing plates off a ZJ are no longer available. So you are getting a braking system with newer parts availability. The only problem I had was that the brake lines fittings are metric while the XJ are Imperial. An adapter fitting took care of that. Napa has them.
Edit. Never mind. I thought u were speaking of swapping the axles.
#10
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
I see reading comprehension is at an all time low.
I used the quote about the ZJ brakes and some of you read what you wanted to and not what was written.
I was talking specifically about the BRAKES. At NO TIME did I mention the complete axle.
I used the quote about the ZJ brakes and some of you read what you wanted to and not what was written.
I was talking specifically about the BRAKES. At NO TIME did I mention the complete axle.
#11
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
If you have a problem I doubt it will be from the centre hole being to large.
And I still stand by the fact that getting 2003 to 2013 brake parts are easier to find than 1993 to 1998.
Last edited by Jamie57; 06-13-2015 at 09:36 AM.
#12
CF Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: new mexico
Posts: 1,874
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 88
Engine: 4.0
From what I've read about the ZJ plate versus the Liberty, the hole will be less than an eighth of an inch larger (more like a sixteenth) and the 4 bolts to the axle are identical.
If you have a problem I doubt it will be from the centre hole being to large.
And I still stand by the fact that getting 2003 to 2013 brake parts are easier to find than 1993 to 1998.
If you have a problem I doubt it will be from the centre hole being to large.
And I still stand by the fact that getting 2003 to 2013 brake parts are easier to find than 1993 to 1998.
Also the Explorer parts are interchangeable to use with the zj parts. I found this out when doin the swap. The Explorer calibers had a slightly bigger piston, and the pads thicker also the e brake hardware I ddint notice but look almost the same.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)