Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

Jeep grand cherokee vs jeep grand cherokee

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 12:41 PM
  #1  
clockwise's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
From: McCall Idaho!
Year: 97
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 5.2
Default Jeep grand cherokee vs jeep grand cherokee

Soo I wanted to know what you guys thinks better an the older style jeep grand cherokee or the newer 99-02 jeep grand cherokees ? Im looking for a semi 4x4ing rig for camping and what not got the 87 cherokee to go through the thick stuff so not really worried about it getting beat up tooo bad
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 12:49 PM
  #2  
thatXJguy's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 6
From: Hudson, FL
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Inline 6
Default

Why wouldn't you want another Cherokee?

I'd pick the ZJ over the WJ. The WJ looks like a boat.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 02:40 PM
  #3  
muffinman's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 701
Likes: 1
From: Johnson County, Kansas
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

Wj, Have had both and really prefered the 2002 overland. The "boat" is pretty capable off road. Lots more room than a XJ. Love that 4.7 H.O power.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 05:31 PM
  #4  
BNJeepsta's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,164
Likes: 1
From: Warren, Pa
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

ZJ's are hideous. Get a wj with the 4.0, 4.7 has too many issues and I'm pretty sure you can't take them out if 4wd
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 05:34 PM
  #5  
thatXJguy's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 6
From: Hudson, FL
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Inline 6
Default

Originally Posted by BNJeepsta
ZJ's are hideous.
In my opinion the Grand Cherokee in general is hideous.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 06:44 PM
  #6  
freedomjesse's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 103
Likes: 1
From: evergren, co
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Anyone who thinks a wj is better looking than a zj is a retard. The wj looks like a freaking minivan!
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 09:30 PM
  #7  
muffinman's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 701
Likes: 1
From: Johnson County, Kansas
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

Originally Posted by freedomjesse
Anyone who thinks a wj is better looking than a zj is a retard. The wj looks like a freaking minivan!
THIS retard loves his 02 grand cherokee overland. Looks *****in.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 09:34 PM
  #8  
muffinman's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 701
Likes: 1
From: Johnson County, Kansas
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

Originally Posted by BNJeepsta
ZJ's are hideous. Get a wj with the 4.0, 4.7 has too many issues and I'm pretty sure you can't take them out if 4wd
So you have had problems with your 4.7? Do you or have you ever owned one? Mine is at 112,900 miles with zero problems. I have just done regular maintence. My 4.0 in the xj is at 198,000 and I see no reason I won't get that or more out of the H.O 4.7
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 09:39 PM
  #9  
clockwise's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
From: McCall Idaho!
Year: 97
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 5.2
Default

well I like the look of both really i just curious about the parts wise stuff i know the 318 is older like the 4.0 soo it probably has alot more options for customization but thats why i want a v8 soo i can just throw a snorkel on it and get good gasmileage and when i say good 18-20 i would be happy but i tow alot of trailers with my 4.0 and i could just use alittle more ***** up the highs living in the mountains
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 10:12 PM
  #10  
BNJeepsta's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,164
Likes: 1
From: Warren, Pa
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by muffinman
So you have had problems with your 4.7? Do you or have you ever owned one? Mine is at 112,900 miles with zero problems. I have just done regular maintence. My 4.0 in the xj is at 198,000 and I see no reason I won't get that or more out of the H.O 4.7
You make a good point, with regular maintenance it can be a good motor. I prefer the 4.0, but to each his own. And no I have never owned one, just worked on a bunch. Mostly in Dakotas though
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 10:27 PM
  #11  
muffinman's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 701
Likes: 1
From: Johnson County, Kansas
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

BN, I have XJ and Tj with the 4.0 so yea I like them alot also. I got my 4.7 H.O.used but with low miles and I knew the history of the vehicle. Mine is awesome but I think the problem people run into is previous owners not maintaining them. Just curious since you work on them what are some of the common problems? Have you noticed any problems at a certain milage? Anything you reommend beyond regular maintence? I am changing the tranny fluid, t case and vari lok axles every 2 years and snythetic oil every 3 thousand miles. I want to keep it running great. Thanks
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 10:41 PM
  #12  
hankthetank's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 1
From: Edmonton
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

i have a mechanic friend that works at a dodge dealership. he says the most common MAJOR thing he sees with the 4.7 is head gaskets. my old man had an 03 dakota, it popped a head gasket. My wifes best friend drives a durango...it popped the head gasket last year. coincidence? dunno. but they suck to do cause part of the head is underneath the fire wall cause of the small engine bay. i haven't heard anything about wj's too much. my mother in law had a '99 that went close to 300k kilometers before she sold it. i like wj's my self. they look bad *** with big tires and about a 4" lift.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2013 | 01:23 AM
  #13  
basegrinder's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 588
Likes: 7
From: Cali
Year: 1993
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 5.2
Default

funny how when it's XJ vs______ the XJ is bullet proof.

then back to the other 99.9999999999999% of threads where someone is having yet another problem and everyone takes pride in "if you ain't broke it aint a jeep"
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2013 | 01:25 AM
  #14  
basegrinder's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 588
Likes: 7
From: Cali
Year: 1993
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 5.2
Default

chrysler is very good at very bad head gaskets. Neon was probably the worst of all
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2013 | 01:51 AM
  #15  
stormitecture's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
From: Tampa, FL & DC/MD infrequently
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
Default

Originally Posted by basegrinder
chrysler is very good at very bad head gaskets. Neon was probably the worst of all
Nope, Subaru 2.5L got them beat. About 75% of 1994-2004 motors have had the head gasket fail. The rest probably just failed/replaced and owners didn't know it (bought used).

Besides, it was only the first gen. neon (up to 1999). 2000 models through the last year never had the issue (above the average for any vehicle).


As far as which to go with...design itself is PURELY SUBJECTIVE. Calling someone else a name because they like one thing over another is being retarded. And this is coming from someone who is all about justifying a design (former architect).

So which to go with to me should come down to a few factors like cost, reliability, mechanical components, etc. My personal opinion is the newer the better. I like the idea that anything after 1997 has an OBD-II. Not just for engine diagnosis for issues, but also to log various criteria while you drive (look into Davis CarChips). I also like the idea that the off-road engineering with newer models is better "out of the box". I would also make sure I went with something that was full disc brakes, ABS if possible, and more (if not modding much).

Last edited by stormitecture; Jan 19, 2013 at 01:58 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 AM.