Another HF pipe kinker thread..
#16
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Sleeping under a Jeep in OZ
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: three x 2001's
Model: Cherokee
you can put a crap ton of work into tube(pipe) fab and have it dent and not be happy with it after one trip. or you can use the same ammount of effort and spend some more money on some DOM and be happy with it for a very long time. i guess it all depends on your intentions with your rig but if your gonna have it at all you would want to feel secure with your work man. if sch40 does it for you than thats your choice.
just my .02
just my .02
#17
CF Veteran
stay away from sch40. i've seen vids where it will crush very easily and split, thus separating and the end going through your skull.
go with crew. it's similar to dom and almost just as strong. keep the majority of the seam towards the inside of the bends and you will be just fine.
after all, dom is just cold rolled that the seam is drawn over a mandrel...
go with crew. it's similar to dom and almost just as strong. keep the majority of the seam towards the inside of the bends and you will be just fine.
after all, dom is just cold rolled that the seam is drawn over a mandrel...
#18
Member
#19
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: LaGrange Il
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
stay away from sch40. i've seen vids where it will crush very easily and split, thus separating and the end going through your skull.
go with crew. it's similar to dom and almost just as strong. keep the majority of the seam towards the inside of the bends and you will be just fine.
after all, dom is just cold rolled that the seam is drawn over a mandrel...
go with crew. it's similar to dom and almost just as strong. keep the majority of the seam towards the inside of the bends and you will be just fine.
after all, dom is just cold rolled that the seam is drawn over a mandrel...
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: grand rapids
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Lord help thee
Resurrecting the dead.
Some folks just have to learn the hard way...it's unfortunate when people don't listen to experienced individuals.
Theses guys have nothing to gain by properly informing you on benders and TUBE.
That being said I love my jd2 model 3. (It's my exercise machine )
Cage in progress, nothing but DOM, and CREW here. 1.75 x .120
I won't even make bumpers or sliders out of and thing besides DOM or CREW. Not worth the time.
Some folks just have to learn the hard way...it's unfortunate when people don't listen to experienced individuals.
Theses guys have nothing to gain by properly informing you on benders and TUBE.
That being said I love my jd2 model 3. (It's my exercise machine )
Cage in progress, nothing but DOM, and CREW here. 1.75 x .120
I won't even make bumpers or sliders out of and thing besides DOM or CREW. Not worth the time.
#21
CF Veteran
but seriously, i wouldn't make an internal cage using sc.40 or anything other than dom, crew or hrew.
the jd2 is a nice little bender. that was gonna be my choice but up here the pro tools is the popular choice, so i went with the pro tools 105HD.
i would like to add the hydraulic set up to it at some point.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: grand rapids
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
ok, the body will likely save you from that scenario, but once it's separated, bent and twisted, you may need a saw to cut that piece off if it were to get into a rare instance. so you should be fine.
but seriously, i wouldn't make an internal cage using sc.40 or anything other than dom, crew or hrew.
the jd2 is a nice little bender. that was gonna be my choice but up here the pro tools is the popular choice, so i went with the pro tools 105HD.
i would like to add the hydraulic set up to it at some point.
but seriously, i wouldn't make an internal cage using sc.40 or anything other than dom, crew or hrew.
the jd2 is a nice little bender. that was gonna be my choice but up here the pro tools is the popular choice, so i went with the pro tools 105HD.
i would like to add the hydraulic set up to it at some point.
#23
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: LaGrange Il
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
heres my 2x6 rockers with a little 1 1/4 sch 40!!!!
the jd2 is so nice. i can even bend 1 5/8 tube with the pipe die if i wanted...
the jd2 is so nice. i can even bend 1 5/8 tube with the pipe die if i wanted...
#24
Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Columbia, KY
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Not trying to hijack your thread but I thought this might be relevant. I've only seen this done online (this is why I'd like a second opinion) but the people swear you can get a kink free bend 95% of the time.
They claim the reason the tube kinks is because it doesn't fit the die tight enough and doesn't support the tube sides while being bent. We all know that tube and pipe are different dimensions that it makes sense that you might have a little wiggle room. The theory is that if you add extra material to the die, bringing it up 50% of the way up the tube, the sides will not be able to expand and crush the bottom. This in addition to a clamp holding it down from the top SHOULD make a kink free bend.
I drew up a quick picture in paint to show what I'm trying to explain. On the left you have a stock die and tube (see extra space and sides not supported), and on the right the red material added to support the tube. One person even claimed to take a die that was too small and grind out the extra material until the tube fit tight.
Anyway, thought this might help the guys that bought a HF tube kinker and want to try it. I know a JD2 type bender is the ultimate but thought some might want to give it a shot.
They claim the reason the tube kinks is because it doesn't fit the die tight enough and doesn't support the tube sides while being bent. We all know that tube and pipe are different dimensions that it makes sense that you might have a little wiggle room. The theory is that if you add extra material to the die, bringing it up 50% of the way up the tube, the sides will not be able to expand and crush the bottom. This in addition to a clamp holding it down from the top SHOULD make a kink free bend.
I drew up a quick picture in paint to show what I'm trying to explain. On the left you have a stock die and tube (see extra space and sides not supported), and on the right the red material added to support the tube. One person even claimed to take a die that was too small and grind out the extra material until the tube fit tight.
Anyway, thought this might help the guys that bought a HF tube kinker and want to try it. I know a JD2 type bender is the ultimate but thought some might want to give it a shot.
#25
::CF Administrator::
Not trying to hijack your thread but I thought this might be relevant. I've only seen this done online (this is why I'd like a second opinion) but the people swear you can get a kink free bend 95% of the time.
They claim the reason the tube kinks is because it doesn't fit the die tight enough and doesn't support the tube sides while being bent. We all know that tube and pipe are different dimensions that it makes sense that you might have a little wiggle room. The theory is that if you add extra material to the die, bringing it up 50% of the way up the tube, the sides will not be able to expand and crush the bottom. This in addition to a clamp holding it down from the top SHOULD make a kink free bend.
I drew up a quick picture in paint to show what I'm trying to explain. On the left you have a stock die and tube (see extra space and sides not supported), and on the right the red material added to support the tube. One person even claimed to take a die that was too small and grind out the extra material until the tube fit tight.
Anyway, thought this might help the guys that bought a HF tube kinker and want to try it. I know a JD2 type bender is the ultimate but thought some might want to give it a shot.
They claim the reason the tube kinks is because it doesn't fit the die tight enough and doesn't support the tube sides while being bent. We all know that tube and pipe are different dimensions that it makes sense that you might have a little wiggle room. The theory is that if you add extra material to the die, bringing it up 50% of the way up the tube, the sides will not be able to expand and crush the bottom. This in addition to a clamp holding it down from the top SHOULD make a kink free bend.
I drew up a quick picture in paint to show what I'm trying to explain. On the left you have a stock die and tube (see extra space and sides not supported), and on the right the red material added to support the tube. One person even claimed to take a die that was too small and grind out the extra material until the tube fit tight.
Anyway, thought this might help the guys that bought a HF tube kinker and want to try it. I know a JD2 type bender is the ultimate but thought some might want to give it a shot.
#26
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: rockinham VT
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: stock I6
I have a bunch of tube benders of different types. You can do press bends if you have a proper fitting die set with a very gentle radius, may be 10-15 degrees or so. Building cages, the challenge for me has been the straight sections of tube. You have to be able to accurately predict where they begin and end and what direction they are going. You can't do this with press bending method without a lot of splicing of tubes or wasting a bunch of material. Making a cage takes a lot of time and work and if I am going to make that effort, I want a good result.
Last edited by ftwelder; 08-15-2015 at 05:35 AM.
#27
CF Veteran
the problem with the harbor freight benders is they are pipe benders, not tube benders.
pipe is measured by the inside, since stuff will be flowing through them, where as tubing is measured on the outside.
this is why tube doesn't fit properly in the pipe die.
dies for my pro tools bender run between 2 and 3 hundred bux each. but it's all worth it by the little waste and nicer bends using a tube bender.
there are cheap home made tubing bender plans available online, but the dies still cost money. either way, it's worth every penny.
pipe is measured by the inside, since stuff will be flowing through them, where as tubing is measured on the outside.
this is why tube doesn't fit properly in the pipe die.
dies for my pro tools bender run between 2 and 3 hundred bux each. but it's all worth it by the little waste and nicer bends using a tube bender.
there are cheap home made tubing bender plans available online, but the dies still cost money. either way, it's worth every penny.
#28
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: LaGrange Il
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Not trying to hijack your thread but I thought this might be relevant. I've only seen this done online (this is why I'd like a second opinion) but the people swear you can get a kink free bend 95% of the time.
They claim the reason the tube kinks is because it doesn't fit the die tight enough and doesn't support the tube sides while being bent. We all know that tube and pipe are different dimensions that it makes sense that you might have a little wiggle room. The theory is that if you add extra material to the die, bringing it up 50% of the way up the tube, the sides will not be able to expand and crush the bottom. This in addition to a clamp holding it down from the top SHOULD make a kink free bend..
They claim the reason the tube kinks is because it doesn't fit the die tight enough and doesn't support the tube sides while being bent. We all know that tube and pipe are different dimensions that it makes sense that you might have a little wiggle room. The theory is that if you add extra material to the die, bringing it up 50% of the way up the tube, the sides will not be able to expand and crush the bottom. This in addition to a clamp holding it down from the top SHOULD make a kink free bend..
#29
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
OK, I know I'm late to the game on this one... but I've had pretty good success with a bender from Harbor Freight. The secret to my success has been to use a piece of slightly larger diameter pipe cut lenghtwise in half as a backing on either side against the rollers... and make sure the die you push with is slightly smaller than the tubing... that way you're pushing on the "sides" of the tube instead of just pushing flat against the middle. I can usually go about 60 degrees before it starts to kink. The bends usually look a bit ovaled through the radius, but when welded into a roll bar or cage look pretty appropriate... Just my two cents worth on what works for me.
#30
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: LaGrange Il
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
let me just update this thread.. AGAIN.. i bought it to bend pipe, like its suppose to be able to. i know people modify it for tube.. the bender doesnt even do what its made for. its junk. if you buy one you just added $100 to the cost of your jd2
if youre thinking about buying one, just dont.
if youre thinking about buying one, just dont.