May COTM Theme
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 15,016
Likes: 11
From: +34° 25' 35.67", -81° 21' 12.04"
Year: 1993
Engine: 4.0
I'm worried about the Calendar. Fuzzy pictures in a Calendar are not acceptable.
I wasn't pleased with several pictures in the last Calendar but that's all I could do since the winner's refused to take time to get good pictures.
I would simply make the new rule:
Within 1 week the COTM winner must submit a 800x1200 pixel, 200dpi (minimum) photo to LR2. If this is not done, the 2nd place finisher moves into the winning spot, and so on.
I think it's good, especially since we're doing calendars.
Within 1 week the COTM winner must submit a 800x1200 pixel, 200dpi (minimum) photo to LR2. If this is not done, the 2nd place finisher moves into the winning spot, and so on.
I think it's good, especially since we're doing calendars.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 15,016
Likes: 11
From: +34° 25' 35.67", -81° 21' 12.04"
Year: 1993
Engine: 4.0
They're updated now.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 15,016
Likes: 11
From: +34° 25' 35.67", -81° 21' 12.04"
Year: 1993
Engine: 4.0
N20's was all ****ed up until I had him go take better pictures.
Nickell586 required a LOT of photoshop.
EmptyPockets wasn't aweful but wasn't great either.
Mud-Digger was a cell phone picture.
The rest were HUGE images and worked great.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 15,016
Likes: 11
From: +34° 25' 35.67", -81° 21' 12.04"
Year: 1993
Engine: 4.0
4/12 not bad. Lol
Would this pic make the cut?
Attachment 190027
I known its not of an XJ but I wonder if my phone would be up for the task.
Would this pic make the cut?
Attachment 190027
I known its not of an XJ but I wonder if my phone would be up for the task.
No.
That picture is 525x700 @ 72 dpi. I need 800x1200.
The picture I took straight from my camera is 2448x3696 @ 300 dpi. lol
Now, it may have been resized when you loaded it to the forum. You can email it to me if you'd like and I can check it.
Last edited by Lowrange2; May 1, 2013 at 11:41 AM.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 15,016
Likes: 11
From: +34° 25' 35.67", -81° 21' 12.04"
Year: 1993
Engine: 4.0
Must've got dithered when it got posted as an attachment. The details as said on my phone.
Attachment 190028
I'd have to put it on photo bucket or something to get full resolution wouldn't I?
Attachment 190028
I'd have to put it on photo bucket or something to get full resolution wouldn't I?
Email it to me.
CF Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,825
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis
Year: '99 and '91
Model: Cherokee
Cool. Good to know.
I've been planning on getting one of those rugged water proof point ans shoot cameras soon. I just haven't decided which one.
The DPI (dots per inch ?) Is what makes it looked washed out isn't it?
I've been planning on getting one of those rugged water proof point ans shoot cameras soon. I just haven't decided which one.
The DPI (dots per inch ?) Is what makes it looked washed out isn't it?




