Other Vehicles. Other Jeep models & cars and trucks of other makes Talk any vehicle tech in here other than Cherokees.

lifted mercury

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2012 | 02:57 PM
  #1  
Trev1006's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,401
Likes: 0
From: Montpelier, Ohio
Year: 92
Engine: 4.0
Default lifted mercury

So the old lady has a 97 mercury mountaineer, shes getting tired of it and wants me to jazz it up. Problem is it has some awd system im not that sure about. Ive straight axled an exploder before, but it had a selectable t case. This has no shifter, full 4x4 all the time. But this thing is an animal as far as power goes. Not sure how but it has the same v8 that my mustang cobra had. So it will be fun lifted and at the ohv park. So does anyone have experience lifting an awd muoantaineer? All I can find is explorer info. Can I do a SAS with the awd t case? I have a d44 I could use if you can SAS it. If not im assuming just crank the torsion bars? Ugh, why wont she just be easy and let me buy her an XJ!
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2012 | 03:01 PM
  #2  
Trev1006's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,401
Likes: 0
From: Montpelier, Ohio
Year: 92
Engine: 4.0
Default

I'd realisticly like to slap 32 or 33's on and not have them rub with some minor trimming.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2012 | 04:45 PM
  #3  
Dan91's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 0
From: Williston, North Dakota
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

I know nothing about Mountaineers but I can't think of any reasons you can't do a SAS with an AWD T case. That being said I saw a HUGE lifted Mountaineer at my college once. It was lifted probably 10+inches and had 38"s on it. SAS of course. Funny thing is a really hot little blonde was driving it.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2012 | 08:29 PM
  #4  
jnicewan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 698
Likes: 2
From: Norman, OK
Year: 95
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Those t-cases are not strong, BTW they are a viscous coupling type setup. If you were going through the trouble of doing all that work, it should not be much of a problem to swap it out with a selectable case like out of another exploder or ranger. The Explorer actually had better 5.0 parts than the mustang GT did. The heads and intake are not great parts but the best pieces mass produced from Ford. Some of the mustang guys actually look for these engines to get the GT40 heads and intake. I think ford hopped the engine up a little bit just so it didn't feel as turdy as the 4.0 SOHC.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 04:58 AM
  #5  
Trev1006's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,401
Likes: 0
From: Montpelier, Ohio
Year: 92
Engine: 4.0
Default

Ya, this one has the gt40 heads and intake on it.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 04:58 AM
  #6  
Trev1006's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,401
Likes: 0
From: Montpelier, Ohio
Year: 92
Engine: 4.0
Default

Thanks alot for the input
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 05:15 AM
  #7  
Trev1006's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,401
Likes: 0
From: Montpelier, Ohio
Year: 92
Engine: 4.0
Default

So if I go through with it I think im.gonna swap in the explorer case and use the short arm stuff from my old lift on my MJ. Will taking out that stock case make the computer go nuts?
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2012 | 01:44 PM
  #8  
slk88cherokee's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 327
Likes: 1
From: newberg
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Search s.a.s. 98 explorer on this thread. I did a 98 explorere v8 awd. Swapped in a narrowed d44, f150 tcase, waggy ft leafs, crossover steering, full spool front, detroit rear, 5.13 gears,toyota steering box to get rid of the rack steering and a lot more. Lots of work and I mean a lot of work...it works awsome though.

Last edited by slk88cherokee; Feb 19, 2012 at 01:50 PM. Reason: duh
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2012 | 07:49 AM
  #9  
OEJ's Avatar
OEJ
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
From: S.Jersey
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

just an fyi on that motor. i actually have like 3 upr/lwr intakes from the mounty and exploder. i decast them,polish them and gasket match if so oredered. i pride myself of my knowledge of fox body to sn97. Also i had a mounty too. great power. rode like ****.lol

the only difference between that intake and the cobra and the real gt-40 intakes was like 10cfm.thats nothing. but if you were to throw the cam into ur wifes mounty from a fox cobra or early sn95 cobra then u would have the same power. as i recall even the heads were the same volume intake and cc. you proly know that. sorry. here is some pics of what my b-inlaw and i did.

1st pic...rite out of the j-yard. 2nd pic isjust about half way through. dont mean to jack ur thread bro..im a pic *****.lol
Attached Thumbnails lifted mercury-p9220396.jpg   lifted mercury-jp49.jpg   lifted mercury-jp34.jpg  

Last edited by OEJ; Feb 21, 2012 at 07:52 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2012 | 07:58 AM
  #10  
XJ-92's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 2
From: Dubuque IA,Libertyville IL
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

heres a pic of my buddys exploder (same as the mountainer except badges) its sitting on 37s and same with the bronco in the pic. he has to use a ladder to get in it.
Attached Images  
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2012 | 07:59 AM
  #11  
Trev1006's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,401
Likes: 0
From: Montpelier, Ohio
Year: 92
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by OEJ
just an fyi on that motor. i actually have like 3 upr/lwr intakes from the mounty and exploder. i decast them,polish them and gasket match if so oredered. i pride myself of my knowledge of fox body to sn97. Also i had a mounty too. great power. rode like ****.lol

the only difference between that intake and the cobra and the real gt-40 intakes was like 10cfm.thats nothing. but if you were to throw the cam into ur wifes mounty from a fox cobra or early sn95 cobra then u would have the same power. as i recall even the heads were the same volume intake and cc. you proly know that. sorry. here is some pics of what my b-inlaw and i did.

1st pic...rite out of the j-yard. 2nd pic isjust about half way through. dont mean to jack ur thread bro..im a pic *****.lol
Those look freakin sweet!
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 12:36 AM
  #12  
wifin's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: Falls Church, VA
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
Default

Hey man I used to have a Mercury. Great suv but I had the same problem with it being an AWD and wanting to lift it. The torsion twist and shackles were the best bet with some bigger tires. But I have the 153 Warrior Shackles that I never even got to use cause I totalled the thing...now I have Jeep! But anyways they add about 1.5"-2 in the rear so if you want I could sell them to ya.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 07:55 AM
  #13  
Trev1006's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,401
Likes: 0
From: Montpelier, Ohio
Year: 92
Engine: 4.0
Default

Ya I think im gonna go that route. But im gonna make my own shackles, thanks tho.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 09:57 AM
  #14  
OEJ's Avatar
OEJ
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
From: S.Jersey
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Trev1006
Those look freakin sweet!
thanks man. im hoping to get to the j-yrd this spring to get some 99 intakes and do them up and sellem. i will prolly do some pocket porting on them too. my b-inlaw and i just got a new shop. so we are finnishing up the wirring,insulation and over all tool setup. should be up and running in about 2 weeks. i allready have a set of amc hurricane wheels to redue for my buddy for his hornet.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2012 | 07:50 PM
  #15  
wvtruckpuller's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 AM.