Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here XJ (84-01)
All OEM related XJ specific tech. Examples, no start, general maintenance or anything that's stock.

4-link to 3-link

Old 01-12-2009, 09:26 AM
  #1  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
Desertfox1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Burlington, NC
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Year: 1994...mostly...
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0L I6 HO, Lot's of Bolt Ons
Default 4-link to 3-link

Alright so I was think the other day about the difference. What's the advantage of either? I know a 3-link provides greater flex off road, but not much beyond that. Also can we just remove the passenger upper control arm from are Cherokees and make them preform better?
Old 01-12-2009, 11:15 AM
  #2  
CF Veteran
 
ktmracer419's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

you will see as much flex as your other components allow with either setup. most likely factory longarms or shocks (provided your brakelines are long enough)

if you remove one upper, you are placing your entire axle and frotn end components at the mercy of one 10mm bolt. if that one bolt snaps, then it takes out other components with it.
Old 01-12-2009, 03:09 PM
  #3  
CF Veteran
 
caged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Northern Ontario, Canada
Posts: 7,874
Received 94 Likes on 85 Posts
Year: 1990, 1999, 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

go for a true long arm. it is essentially a 4 bar link, but mounts to the frame in only 2 places.

the upper arms both mount to the lowers.


i wouldn't remove any stock arms. they are very weak and bend quite easily in their stock locations as it is.
Old 01-12-2009, 05:10 PM
  #4  
CF Veteran
 
wicked_xj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I 6
Default

X2 on cage i know the stock uppers are weak lol
Old 01-12-2009, 05:11 PM
  #5  
CF Veteran
 
wicked_xj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I 6
Default

X2 on cage i know that from experience
Old 01-12-2009, 08:14 PM
  #6  
CF Veteran
 
93XJLI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0, bolt ons for days...
Default

Originally Posted by caged
go for a true long arm. it is essentially a 4 bar link, but mounts to the frame in only 2 places.

the upper arms both mount to the lowers.


i wouldn't remove any stock arms. they are very weak and bend quite easily in their stock locations as it is.
what?

a there are plenty of "true" long arm kits and designs that arent radius arms which you described. and what are you saying about the stock CA mounts?
Old 01-13-2009, 10:03 AM
  #7  
CF Veteran
 
caged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Northern Ontario, Canada
Posts: 7,874
Received 94 Likes on 85 Posts
Year: 1990, 1999, 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

i've seen some longarm kits that still use the stock upper control arm frame mounts for the upper links, but the lowers are mounted to a custom crossmember. they still work, but do limit some articulation.

i didn't say anything about the stock control arm mounts, but i'd just cut em off anyways. they're weak too.

cheers
Old 01-13-2009, 10:09 AM
  #8  
CF Veteran
 
ktmracer419's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by caged
i've seen some longarm kits that still use the stock upper control arm frame mounts for the upper links, but the lowers are mounted to a custom crossmember. they still work, but do limit some articulation.

i didn't say anything about the stock control arm mounts, but i'd just cut em off anyways. they're weak too.

cheers
terafail?

sure it limits articulation, but i would be more concerned with the pinion dive and binding driveshafts
Old 01-13-2009, 04:41 PM
  #9  
CF Veteran
 
caged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Northern Ontario, Canada
Posts: 7,874
Received 94 Likes on 85 Posts
Year: 1990, 1999, 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

yeah, that's it.

i just didn't want to openly diss a product, but yeah....
Old 01-13-2009, 06:07 PM
  #10  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
Desertfox1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Burlington, NC
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Year: 1994...mostly...
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0L I6 HO, Lot's of Bolt Ons
Default

Well ya'll answered that question, I forgot how small those stock upper control arm bolts are. I don't plan on doing a long arm anytime soon as I've got other projects I'm working on. When I do go that route my plans are to go with the RK 3-link. That's what got me thinking about a short arm one. Thanks for the info guys.
Old 01-13-2009, 06:16 PM
  #11  
CF Veteran
 
wicked_xj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I 6
Default

It isn't hard to make you own just get the brackets and a calculator
Old 01-13-2009, 09:53 PM
  #12  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
Desertfox1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Burlington, NC
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Year: 1994...mostly...
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0L I6 HO, Lot's of Bolt Ons
Default

Originally Posted by wicked_xj
It isn't hard to make you own just get the brackets and a calculator
True, especially one as simple as the RK kit. I plan on keeping it low at 4.5" for now with 33's so no need for a full long arm setup.
Old 01-13-2009, 11:21 PM
  #13  
CF Veteran
 
93XJLI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0, bolt ons for days...
Default

Originally Posted by Desertfox1023
True, especially one as simple as the RK kit. I plan on keeping it low at 4.5" for now with 33's so no need for a full long arm setup.
RK's kit is a "full" long arm kit..
Old 01-14-2009, 07:18 AM
  #14  
CF Veteran
Thread Starter
 
Desertfox1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Burlington, NC
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Year: 1994...mostly...
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0L I6 HO, Lot's of Bolt Ons
Default

Originally Posted by 93XJLI
RK's kit is a "full" long arm kit..
Ya, I know what the RK kit is. You misunderstood my posting. I don't plan on running a long arm kit. I'm just going to keep running it as is with the short arms at 4.5". It hasn't given me any problems yet. I was just stating how simple the design is on the RK kit. Really don't know how everyone got off on longarm talks cause the original post was meant for just talking about trying to improve the stock suspension by removing a limiting factor. Which was solved quickly by the reminder that the stock upper control arm bolts are 10mm.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ianf406
Modified XJ Cherokee Tech
187
11-27-2019 03:13 PM
DynoGuy
Jeep Builds
52
04-26-2016 04:55 AM
axekick
Modified XJ Cherokee Tech
4
10-07-2015 09:23 AM
jeeper albert
Modified XJ Cherokee Tech
3
01-30-2014 05:30 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 4-link to 3-link



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 AM.