2014 Trailhawk
#49
::Regional Moderator::
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Over here...
Posts: 2,912
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.8
I doubt any of the big dogs would be interested in making stuff for them. Jeep should worry about getting the bugs worked out of the KL before worrying about having aftermarket support.
#51
::Regional Moderator::
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Over here...
Posts: 2,912
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.8
From reading cherokee club I can see three trans replacements already happening. Someone had their 4x4 system killed by a faulty bcm. Radio issues, leaks, heating issues, no 9th gear, trans not shifting past 7th, etc. It's been interesting watching the problems people are having.
#52
CF Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Eaton Co
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
The Trailhawk is more than just an ugly face. Stock to stock it will out wheel a XJ. Modded is a different story but a modded XJ will never see 30mpg or ride as nice. For its intended purpose it does what it should well sans the problems emptypockets mentioned. Which makes me wonder how many of these will be running strong at 200k+ miles?
Last edited by Outlaw Star; 01-09-2014 at 05:28 PM.
#53
::Regional Moderator::
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Over here...
Posts: 2,912
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.8
The Trailhawl is more than just an ugly face. Stock to stock it will out wheel a XJ. Modded is a different story but a modded XJ will never see 30mpg or ride as nice. For its intended purpose it does what it should well sans the problems emptypockets mentioned. Which makes me wonder how many of these will be running strong at 200k+ miles?
#54
The Trailhawl is more than just an ugly face. Stock to stock it will out wheel a XJ. Modded is a different story but a modded XJ will never see 30mpg or ride as nice. For its intended purpose it does what it should well sans the problems emptypockets mentioned. Which makes me wonder how many of these will be running strong at 200k+ miles?
#55
CF Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,825
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Year: '99 and '91
Model: Cherokee
From reading cherokee club I can see three trans replacements already happening. Someone had their 4x4 system killed by a faulty bcm. Radio issues, leaks, heating issues, no 9th gear, trans not shifting past 7th, etc. It's been interesting watching the problems people are having.
#56
Seasoned Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
#58
::CF Administrator::
The mileage numbers boasted on the sticker are BS anyways...those numbers are doled out by the EPA in perfect world conditions and scenarios in a closed lab setting, you will never see that kind of fuel economy, ever, in a car you purchase and drive off the lot. The numbers are inflated to begin with.
#59
CF Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Frankfort IL
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
The mileage numbers boasted on the sticker are BS anyways...those numbers are doled out by the EPA in perfect world conditions and scenarios in a closed lab setting, you will never see that kind of fuel economy, ever, in a car you purchase and drive off the lot. The numbers are inflated to begin with.
My wife's VW gets about exactly what the sticker said it would when she drives it.
#60
CF Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Eaton Co
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
The mileage numbers boasted on the sticker are BS anyways...those numbers are doled out by the EPA in perfect world conditions and scenarios in a closed lab setting, you will never see that kind of fuel economy, ever, in a car you purchase and drive off the lot. The numbers are inflated to begin with.