Stroker motor?
#61
CF Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Spanish Fork, Utah
Posts: 2,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: Renix 4.0L
Originally Posted by lolzabee
the 4.0 has pretty low power, dont kid yourself. 3.0L nissan engines (the NA engines obviously, not turbo) made the same HP and only 20 ft. lbs less in 1996 than the 1996 jeep 4.0. Its an archaic engine design that doesnt do much for maximizing power. Pushrod engine, etc. blah blah. Basically, the engine in my 2002 maxima makes 15 more FT lbs and 63 more HP at the wheels than my jeep makes at the crank. And before you ask, yes it does make more tq than my jeep at 2k RPM...at the wheels
I love my jeep, but efficiency of this engine is lacking. It lasts a long time though! Though not as long as most import engines of its time do
/americancarcompaniesrodeagoodthingwaytoolong rant
I love my jeep, but efficiency of this engine is lacking. It lasts a long time though! Though not as long as most import engines of its time do
/americancarcompaniesrodeagoodthingwaytoolong rant
#64
Originally Posted by dev_daddy
Well lets see that same nissan engine power something with 40" tires, the rest of beefy drivetrain, 4,000+ pound vehicle, and hit trails and rocks and water and mud and sand for miles and miles and years and years... yeah. Your nissan would cry.
PS, if it made any sense I would swap that engine into the jeep in a heartbeat. It's been great to me no matter what I did to it. Including make over 200 wheel tq at 2000 rpm and still make good power and tq at 7k. I'm not ripping on the 4.0, just saying it's not a real great design, just the same ole same ole that Chrysler was putting out since the 60s basically (they added electronic ignition and fuel injection, besides that it's the same tech that my 69 chevelle engine had). My maxima would definitely cry if I took it through mud and rocks and water, its a street car. Engine would be just fine though.
Cliff notes? It's a good engine, but with a little tech it could be a lot more
#65
I think everyone got off topic with this one. The OP was just asking for pros/cons of a stroker 4.0 and wanted to stay away from an engine swap. But I do think a good 4.6 striker with a mild cam and some head work would make a great DD and not cause any computer issues. Maybe just swap in some 704/784 injectors at the same time and enjoy your new found power.
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
PS, if it made any sense I would swap that engine into the jeep in a heartbeat. It's been great to me no matter what I did to it. Including make over 200 wheel tq at 2000 rpm and still make good power and tq at 7k. I'm not ripping on the 4.0, just saying it's not a real great design, just the same ole same ole that Chrysler was putting out since the 60s basically (they added electronic ignition and fuel injection, besides that it's the same tech that my 69 chevelle engine had). My maxima would definitely cry if I took it through mud and rocks and water, its a street car. Engine would be just fine though.
Cliff notes? It's a good engine, but with a little tech it could be a lot more
Cliff notes? It's a good engine, but with a little tech it could be a lot more
#69
☠ CF Sheriff ☠
here's a good summary of options with results and cost range for each set
http://www.ajeepthing.com/stroker-motor.html
http://www.ajeepthing.com/stroker-motor.html
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Austindude2015
Cherokee Chat
17
12-28-2020 05:12 PM
toasterknight
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
33
05-21-2016 07:03 AM
Josh Meck
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
1
09-27-2015 03:16 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)