Question for anyone with a Sprintex supercharger
#31
CF Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: PA KOTUFU!
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
15 Posts
Year: 1998
Engine: 4.0L 162,000
Yeah 35-40% HP and TQ increase that's all.
And don't need a MS to make them work, hell very few can even get the MS to work.
Everyone has their opinion. Your sense is someone else's nonsense. To each his own.
And don't need a MS to make them work, hell very few can even get the MS to work.
Everyone has their opinion. Your sense is someone else's nonsense. To each his own.
#32
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Yep, that's exactly right. What might make sense to one person might not make sense to another. There are TONS of ways to waste money on cars and trucks. None of them will add to the value of the vehicle (since Cherokees aren't exactly an investment) and therefore when you put it into perspective every single thing you do to these cars is a waste of money.
#33
CF Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: PA KOTUFU!
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
15 Posts
Year: 1998
Engine: 4.0L 162,000
To put it into perspective, It picked up 100HP on an engine that already put out ? 300-350hp. That is a 30% increase. But it also required headers which are not cheap, ? $500.
That $2700 supercharger + $500 headers 10 years ago, adjusted for inflation, today is well worth over $5000+.
So Today, a supercharger that also adds 30-40% more HP and TQ and costs half of what you spent in today's dollars, is a pretty good deal, the way I see it.
But then again, we all look thru different eyes when we evaluate value.
Moving on... Boost is fun and addicting!
#34
CF Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: central IN
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
11 Posts
Year: 1997
Engine: 4.0
edit: when did inflation on aftermarket parts get to 92%? the entire kit, headers, and tune on that car was less than $2700. yeah, it made sense back then. at that point there were very few cars out on the weekends that trapped over 115. and LT1s don't have the world's greatest flowing stock heads on them either, I had less in a blower setup than a head/cam/intake swap would've cost. not to mention, the car drove like stock and still maintained 20+ mpg.
Last edited by s346k; 07-29-2014 at 04:30 PM.
#37
CF Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: PA KOTUFU!
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
15 Posts
Year: 1998
Engine: 4.0L 162,000
Superchargers are always practical.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CherokeeHoonigan
Modified XJ Cherokee Tech
89
07-04-2023 02:20 PM
codykrr
Modified XJ Cherokee Tech
9
09-18-2015 01:27 PM
mach3lude
Modified XJ Cherokee Tech
17
09-10-2015 02:34 PM
Carlisle
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
0
09-06-2015 08:21 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)