long arm kit?
#18
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6 4.0L 242
I'm stuck between Serious's LA and B.Lee's 3-link set up. They both look fantastic and I'm sure my XJ would graciously accept either one.
#19
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Warren, Pa
Posts: 2,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
I am on the exact same fence right now. I wanted to go 3 link but, the B. Lee's kit uses 7/8 heim joints and I feel like those are kinda small. The serious kit is legit, just not sure I want radius arms.
#20
CF Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: City of Trees, CA
Posts: 7,387
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
9 Posts
Year: 93 2 door
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
this is coming from a guy who has ran both a 3 link and a radius arm kit
#21
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6 4.0L 242
looking at B Lee's 3 link... it doesn't look bad. but it doesn't look particularly good either. Franks kit looks good. I'd feel more comfortable running his radius arm kit. people clap out 7/8 heims in steering all the time, not sure how long they would last in suspension. if you're going 3 link I'd want to build it myself. I never really saw a 3 link kit on the market that appealed to me for the cost... I'd take the serious long arms in this comparison. even though a 3 link performs noticeably better
this is coming from a guy who has ran both a 3 link and a radius arm kit
this is coming from a guy who has ran both a 3 link and a radius arm kit
I do like Frank's kit, and it's even cheaper to boot. I don't do a whole lot of rock climbing and I'm more of an expedition/overland kinda guy who eventually will make it back to Tahoe so I can do the Rubicon since it's right behind my folks place in Minden.
That being said, I'm not too worried about the high ATS numbers and unloading that people seem to like to talk about in regards to radius arm set ups.
So many decisions
#22
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
Once you get over 4" lifts you should always do long arms. Short arms throw off your pinion angles and will eat up u joints
#24
CF Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Hell, CA
Posts: 2,127
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
Mid/long arms are nice. I prefer a setup that uses a removable center crossmember, or brackets in front of.
If you already have a decent set of adjustable control arms. Maybe pickup a set of CAD brackets to compliment them, if you can't afford a good long arm setup.
If you already have a decent set of adjustable control arms. Maybe pickup a set of CAD brackets to compliment them, if you can't afford a good long arm setup.
#25
CF Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: City of Trees, CA
Posts: 7,387
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
9 Posts
Year: 93 2 door
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
I do like Frank's kit, and it's even cheaper to boot. I don't do a whole lot of rock climbing and I'm more of an expedition/overland kinda guy who eventually will make it back to Tahoe so I can do the Rubicon since it's right behind my folks place in Minden.
That being said, I'm not too worried about the high ATS numbers and unloading that people seem to like to talk about in regards to radius arm set ups.
So many decisions
That being said, I'm not too worried about the high ATS numbers and unloading that people seem to like to talk about in regards to radius arm set ups.
So many decisions
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mach3lude
Modified XJ Cherokee Tech
17
09-10-2015 02:34 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)