Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

Anyone ever run nitrous on a 4.0??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-2011, 03:51 PM
  #16  
Registered Users
 
jmm0122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

This guy did.
jmm0122 is offline  
Old 09-26-2011, 04:07 PM
  #17  
CF Veteran
 
Donnie_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0, comp cam, 99 intake, apn header, neon injectors, Thunderbolt 2.5" High Flow Cat
Default

Originally Posted by Hoooper
because they want to make big power more reliably and efficiently than a 4.0L engine based on 1970s engineering can?
GASP! You mean that 1970s engineering that still put out more power than most of the V8's in the 90's? BLASPHEMY!

Ya'll really should start looking up performance specs and compare before you start spewing this kinda stuff...
Donnie_K is offline  
Old 09-26-2011, 04:31 PM
  #18  
Seasoned Member
 
jronald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Outside of RTP NC
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1993
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: V8
Default

The problem is not the nitrous, the problem is the right foot.

Ron
jronald is offline  
Old 09-26-2011, 05:11 PM
  #19  
CF Veteran
 
odgreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: some small town oregon
Posts: 15,581
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by jmm0122
YES!
odgreen is offline  
Old 09-26-2011, 05:15 PM
  #20  
CF Veteran
 
Hoooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Hayward, CA
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by Donnie_K
GASP! You mean that 1970s engineering that still put out more power than most of the V8's in the 90's? BLASPHEMY!

Ya'll really should start looking up performance specs and compare before you start spewing this kinda stuff...
well designed 4.0L and even smaller 6cyls in the 90s made more power than our 4.0L, and most of the remaining WELL DESIGNED v6s in the 90s made more power/volume than ours.

dont start getting butt hurt because the Jeep 4.0L isnt the best I6 ever made, I think we can all accept there are better engines out there

and comparing it to the garbage v8s that had largely remained the same since the 60s?
Hoooper is offline  
Old 09-26-2011, 09:27 PM
  #21  
CF Veteran
 
Donnie_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0, comp cam, 99 intake, apn header, neon injectors, Thunderbolt 2.5" High Flow Cat
Default

Originally Posted by Hoooper
well designed 4.0L and even smaller 6cyls in the 90s made more power than our 4.0L, and most of the remaining WELL DESIGNED v6s in the 90s made more power/volume than ours.

dont start getting butt hurt because the Jeep 4.0L isnt the best I6 ever made, I think we can all accept there are better engines out there

and comparing it to the garbage v8s that had largely remained the same since the 60s?
Sounds like it's time to put up or shut up then son. Prove it... what's "WELL DESIGNED"? we're talking 4x4's here. Fast and Furious Fart Canned Hyundais don't really fit in that category, do they? Nobody's butt hurt, unless I insulted someone's honda. Think it through young blood, you're the one that decided to comment on the 4.0's lack of power on a jeep forum... and honestly it's a hell of a power plant to start with. Plenty of low end torque and unbeatable reliability. We can go have this debate on some non jeep 4x4 forum if you like. Rather than hijack this guys NOS thread with debating the quality of the foundation he wants to start with.
Donnie_K is offline  
Old 09-26-2011, 09:57 PM
  #22  
CF Veteran
 
Hoooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Hayward, CA
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Default

wait, so if I want to take about good engines, i have to keep it to 4x4s? WTF kind of sense does that make? Trucks and SUVs, especially in the 90s, are known to have little invested in development, just look at how little the cherokee changed from beginning to end. so how the heck would looking only at 4x4s make sense? Well designed pretty much means not a pushrod engine, preferably an engine with constantly variable cam timing on at least the intake cam(s), coil over plug (though the dist in our 4.0L is ok). There are various other items regarding intake and exhaust that could be better though I feel the Jeep 4.0L is fair for an OEM setup.

And FYI, I was defending his choice of using nitrous in the first place and not debating his powerplant, feel free to actually read the thread and report back

Last edited by Hoooper; 09-26-2011 at 10:15 PM.
Hoooper is offline  
Old 09-27-2011, 07:37 AM
  #23  
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
 
ClaytonXJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CT
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 96
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

I'd rather not debate about what's the greatest 6cyl ever. In my opinion they're slower than **** out of the box, but can be made to go a little better. I just want to make it go a lot better. That being said, it is still a great engine. Nobody should expect a straight 6 to be fast. They are reliable. Not impressed with the torque, they only seem to move between 3500 and 5k. I wouldn't say they are the most reliable engine ever, they have nothing on a 4.9 Ford. But they work fine to move a little Jeep around and I haven't killed mine yet.
And there is nothing wrong with 1960s technology. All this fancy new electronic bs is just more to break. Do you see NASCAR using coil on plug, efi, overhead cams or any other fancy **** to make 900hp from a naturally aspirated 358 cui? Nope. Just a junk 1960s technology, small displacement, carbureted, pushrod small block. With compression, camshaft, cylinder head and carb rules holding it back to boot. But they're not reliable I guess, they will only last 600+ miles wide open at 9500rpm.

Guess I will just let everyone know how long a 4.0 will live on the bottle.
ClaytonXJ is offline  
Old 09-27-2011, 07:54 AM
  #24  
CF Veteran
 
Donnie_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0, comp cam, 99 intake, apn header, neon injectors, Thunderbolt 2.5" High Flow Cat
Default

lol, most of your stock motors in your trucks were slower than dog turds back then. But we'll leave that dead horse lay. How many miles did you say you have on that motor? You happen to regear when you went to those 35's? That's the biggest problem I see as far as your motor, trans, transfer case and driveshafts.

@Hooper - Yes. 4x4 engines... this is going in a 4x4, not an indycar. two completely different animals. FYI, dual overhead cams and coil packs can kick rocks, along with their aluminum blocks. Don't get me wrong, I got all that on my bike, but that wouldn't hold up very well climbing over rocks and logs or bashing through mud. Just an opinion.

Last edited by Donnie_K; 09-27-2011 at 08:00 AM.
Donnie_K is offline  
Old 09-27-2011, 09:21 AM
  #25  
CF Veteran
 
Gorillaxj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

blah blah blah LOL

The 4.0L is a great start with the 8.8-1 compression ratio, which is great for adding boost/n20, I would keep it at a 50-100 shot wet. you will want a wet shot to compensate for the added air/compression. the factory fuel system will not handle the added shot fast enough and will cause it to lean out while spraying.

You will also need to get a wide band setup to moniter the rich/lean condition to watch for any signs of fituige/failure before it costs you a motor. Your also going to want to get colder spark plugs 2-3 heat ranges depending on the size of the shot, to help with predetonation.

A lot of people will recomend letting off the spray between shifts to limit the flare up between gears. I would also recomend window switches, one that will only spray at rull throttle, and one that will cut spray 500-1000 before redline. (don't want to spray into reline )

Do it right and have a lot of reliable fun at the push of a button, cheap out and the fun time is limited with a costly aftermath. do a lot of reading on n20 and what people have had work and fail on the 4.0L.

Good luck, N20 is amazing!

Last edited by Gorillaxj; 09-27-2011 at 09:24 AM.
Gorillaxj is offline  
Old 09-27-2011, 09:34 AM
  #26  
CF Veteran
 
ericfx1984's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0HO
Default

nitrous on the trail makes no sense to me... but don't let that stop you
ericfx1984 is offline  
Old 09-27-2011, 09:46 AM
  #27  
CF Veteran
 
Gorillaxj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

here is a thread from this site about a year ago... from what it says run a 50-75. there are kits made for the 4.0L, I would do some researcha nd talk witht htese companys about the experience people have had. what a lot of poeple don't know is that its anot that cheap to setup correctly. but it is cheaper then the alternatives.

https://www.cherokeeforum.com/f2/nit...herokee-60496/

Nitrous is like a gold digging, bit%$y girlfriend that you keep around for the amazing sex.

lol
Gorillaxj is offline  
Old 09-27-2011, 10:10 AM
  #28  
CF Veteran
 
Hoooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Hayward, CA
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by Donnie_K
@Hooper - Yes. 4x4 engines... this is going in a 4x4, not an indycar. two completely different animals. FYI, dual overhead cams and coil packs can kick rocks, along with their aluminum blocks. Don't get me wrong, I got all that on my bike, but that wouldn't hold up very well climbing over rocks and logs or bashing through mud. Just an opinion.
ignorance must be bliss my good sir
Hoooper is offline  
Old 09-27-2011, 10:29 AM
  #29  
CF Veteran
 
Donnie_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0, comp cam, 99 intake, apn header, neon injectors, Thunderbolt 2.5" High Flow Cat
Default

No need for name callin' son. You go get your little vtech honda with the variable valve timing and coil packs, and fart can muffler and burn up those streets. Us grown folk will be on the trail somewhere in our big slow 4x4's, except the couple that are out there with us with their nitrous kits. Have fun, and watch out for those speeding tickets.
Donnie_K is offline  
Old 09-27-2011, 11:03 AM
  #30  
CF Veteran
 
Hoooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Hayward, CA
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by Donnie_K
vtech honda .
I was not aware that Honda had teamed with Vtech to put cordless phone technology in their cars

Hoooper is offline  


Quick Reply: Anyone ever run nitrous on a 4.0??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 AM.