383 stroker
#17
I think back in the day it probably had a lot of truth with limited custom parts but now I think its up to the builders ability. My family and I have had two top shop competition engines not winner's but a runner up once. if that counts for anything. Now days your ability to build horse power is limited to your ability to write checks.
#18
Seasoned Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Purcellville, Virginia
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: '95
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Believe me, I still love old school iron, but today LS stuff has become so comparable in price it's almost a no brainer. You can find 5.3's and 6.0's for almost dirt cheap. Throw a small cam in there, some custom tuning to disable GM's torque management and abuse modes, hook it up to a 4l60/80, and you'll be a happy camper.
#19
This.
Believe me, I still love old school iron, but today LS stuff has become so comparable in price it's almost a no brainer. You can find 5.3's and 6.0's for almost dirt cheap. Throw a small cam in there, some custom tuning to disable GM's torque management and abuse modes, hook it up to a 4l60/80, and you'll be a happy camper.
#20
I'd beg to differ. I've built stroked 283's that a naturally aspirated 383 would catch hell trying to keep up with. After stroking I still had a 81 cubic inch deficit. Large displacement will build big power if built rite don't get me wrong, but with the technology today smaller cubic engines with less rotating mass will build big power and much better torque curves. Just my two cents.
tI agree -- here is not replacement for displacement, but with technology today, a 283 can easily hit horsepower levels only attainable by large small blocks form the sixties.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Austindude2015
Cherokee Chat
17
12-28-2020 05:12 PM
little smathers
Modified XJ Cherokee Tech
0
09-20-2015 03:32 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)