rim weight
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1898
Model: Cherokee
Engine: renix negative 4.0
rim weight
I know this sounds so terrible stupid, but does the weight of the rim of your vehicle, steel versus aluminum, make a difference for mpg? someone told me it did and I told them they where full of ****ing **** and to go pound sand, but didn't believe me.
your thoughts? am I wrong or right here?
your thoughts? am I wrong or right here?
#2
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fairfield, CT
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
I know this sounds so terrible stupid, but does the weight of the rim of your vehicle, steel versus aluminum, make a difference for mpg? someone told me it did and I told them they where full of ****ing **** and to go pound sand, but didn't believe me.
your thoughts? am I wrong or right here?
your thoughts? am I wrong or right here?
#3
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1898
Model: Cherokee
Engine: renix negative 4.0
That was basically my entire argument. It is menial.
I mean the dude put bags of sand in his passanger seat when he first got his new lift to 'balance out the wear of the suspension'. I don't think we should be friends anymore.
I really think he is going bat**** crazy.
I mean the dude put bags of sand in his passanger seat when he first got his new lift to 'balance out the wear of the suspension'. I don't think we should be friends anymore.
I really think he is going bat**** crazy.
#4
sorry, but this reminds me of a guy on another forum who preached that his wheels weighed 18.967777777777777 lbs each and he swore if he went with wheels that weighed 18.023333 lbs each he would get 3 mpg less. the truth is that the less rotating mass you have will give you better gas milage, but the difference is neglible. i run huge heavy bias ply tires on a steel wheel and manage near stock mpg.
#5
Renix Super Guru
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In yourz postez fissin jurr spelinzs
Posts: 24,653
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
12 Posts
Year: 1990XJ/1989MJ
Model: Comanche
Engine: 4.0L Renix
The weight, if in fact it makes a difference, is so small that it is probably immeasurable. You would save just as much by vacuuming the dirt out of your carpets and saying that it effects your overall weight, thus your MPG.
#6
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1898
Model: Cherokee
Engine: renix negative 4.0
sorry, but this reminds me of a guy on another forum who preached that his wheels weighed 18.967777777777777 lbs each and he swore if he went with wheels that weighed 18.023333 lbs each he would get 3 mpg less. the truth is that the less rotating mass you have will give you better gas milage, but the difference is neglible. i run huge heavy bias ply tires on a steel wheel and manage near stock mpg.
Wow that is awesome to hear. What size bias tires on what lift, ktmracer 419?
#7
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fairfield, CT
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
I had a guy on jeepforum inform me i was inexperienced because i told him he was clueless when he claimed that lockers are flashy and useless and are just "adding unnecessary weight"
in short, run whatever rims you want, just dont make em dubs.
in short, run whatever rims you want, just dont make em dubs.
Trending Topics
#9
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1898
Model: Cherokee
Engine: renix negative 4.0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)