2.8L to 3.4L engine swap, anyone done it?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
2.8L to 3.4L engine swap, anyone done it?
hey guys, first post! Anybody out there swapped their tired old 2.8L V6 for the 93-95Camaro/Firebird 3.4L V6? I have done extensive motor work on my 91 300zx twin turbo but now its time to give my XJ a little more power! i found a donor motor for $200 5mins from my house. i will be using this site as a guide and it seems pretty straightforward.
http://www.lunghd.com/Tech_Articles/...Project_XJ.htm
the only problems i see is cleaning up the 24yr old grime,grease,mud, and oil sludge from around the motor, and wiring in an electric fuel pump.
If anyone has any advice i am all ears?
P.s. if you were wondering its a 1986 2.8lv6 4wd automatic cherokee chief with 266,000 on the clock(original motor) and my dad bought her new june 1986.
sadly enough here is the only pic i have on my school computer. Ignore the R1 haha
http://www.lunghd.com/Tech_Articles/...Project_XJ.htm
the only problems i see is cleaning up the 24yr old grime,grease,mud, and oil sludge from around the motor, and wiring in an electric fuel pump.
If anyone has any advice i am all ears?
P.s. if you were wondering its a 1986 2.8lv6 4wd automatic cherokee chief with 266,000 on the clock(original motor) and my dad bought her new june 1986.
sadly enough here is the only pic i have on my school computer. Ignore the R1 haha
#2
CF Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Watha,NC
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: Jeepless at the moment
it will fit they are both 60* V6s , for more info go here: http://60degreev6.com/ someone there could def help ya
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
it will fit they are both 60* V6s , for more info go here: http://60degreev6.com/ someone there could def help ya
#4
CF Veteran
Nix the 4.0. You would need a donor vehicle for that. From what I have heard, the 3.4 is a good replacement. They will bolt in. You will need to knock the counter balance weight off the 2.8 flex plate. Get all the wiring for the 3.4 and throttle cable from the fire wall to throttle body. Also make sure your radiator is good, in fact get the 2 core radiator for it and be safe.
#5
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Bay
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 85
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.8 V6
What if you did have a 4.0 donor car?
Will it be worth it then, and an easier swap than the 3.4?
I only ask because I can get a whole donor car (94 XJ) with a strong 4.0 for $500
Will it be worth it then, and an easier swap than the 3.4?
I only ask because I can get a whole donor car (94 XJ) with a strong 4.0 for $500
#6
MJ>XJ
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Griffin, G.A.
Posts: 17,836
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Comanche
Engine: 4.0 I6
the 4.0 would be more difficult... the cherokee "frame" for the motor mounts is going to be setup different... the 3.4 was a problem motor but so was the 2.8... and you see how long that one lasted... its all about watching your motor... knowing the common problems.... and keeping an eye out for them... i believe the 3.4 IS the 2.8 if i remember right... the 3.1 is a bored 2.8 and the 3.4 is a bored and strokes 2.8... something like that... all of which had intake gasket problems leading to a blown motor... i think only the 90' ish luminas has the intake manifold that would seat right... if i was you and you were stuck on keeping the XJ i would rebuilt your 2.8 with some goodies... would come out cheaper and less work in the end... maybe you can bore and stroke your 2.8 using 3.4 parts? and then you would have to swap wiring harnesses and all that crap in there... im sure its been done somewhere... maybe not a cherokee but maybe a 2.8 cavalier or something...
#7
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Bay
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 85
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.8 V6
the 4.0 would be more difficult... the cherokee "frame" for the motor mounts is going to be setup different... the 3.4 was a problem motor but so was the 2.8... and you see how long that one lasted... its all about watching your motor... knowing the common problems.... and keeping an eye out for them... i believe the 3.4 IS the 2.8 if i remember right... the 3.1 is a bored 2.8 and the 3.4 is a bored and strokes 2.8... something like that... all of which had intake gasket problems leading to a blown motor... i think only the 90' ish luminas has the intake manifold that would seat right... if i was you and you were stuck on keeping the XJ i would rebuilt your 2.8 with some goodies... would come out cheaper and less work in the end... maybe you can bore and stroke your 2.8 using 3.4 parts? and then you would have to swap wiring harnesses and all that crap in there... im sure its been done somewhere... maybe not a cherokee but maybe a 2.8 cavalier or something...
And far less time consuming.
From my understanding, you're saying that's the only difference among the 3 engines (2.8, 3.1, 3.4) is the bore, and bore/stroke, which would all be in the block.
Last edited by cliffmeister3; 10-08-2010 at 05:08 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Registered Users
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: morrisonville ny
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Year: 2000 @ 1994 givin away
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Easier to put everything good on the donor jeep if that is good,there is no easy way for the 2.8 to do anything. the 3.4 liter swap isn't easy either lots of work ahead of you there also Easest thing to do is rebuild the 2.8 bore it 30 over better pistons,comp cam,elderbrock 4 barrel intake with a small 390 cfm 4 barrel carb,block hugger headers and a dual exhaust might not be a true duel but close.
#9
Registered Users
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: morrisonville ny
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Year: 2000 @ 1994 givin away
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
How about just swapping in the 3.4 block? Wouldn't that be easier and cheaper?
And far less time consuming.
From my understanding, you're saying that's the only difference among the 3 engines (2.8, 3.1, 3.4) is the bore, and bore/stroke, which would all be in the block.
And far less time consuming.
From my understanding, you're saying that's the only difference among the 3 engines (2.8, 3.1, 3.4) is the bore, and bore/stroke, which would all be in the block.
#10
MJ>XJ
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Griffin, G.A.
Posts: 17,836
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Comanche
Engine: 4.0 I6
How about just swapping in the 3.4 block? Wouldn't that be easier and cheaper?
And far less time consuming.
From my understanding, you're saying that's the only difference among the 3 engines (2.8, 3.1, 3.4) is the bore, and bore/stroke, which would all be in the block.
And far less time consuming.
From my understanding, you're saying that's the only difference among the 3 engines (2.8, 3.1, 3.4) is the bore, and bore/stroke, which would all be in the block.
because finding and buying a 3.4 block and rebuilding it would cost the same as rebuilding/boring/strokeing the 2.8... since you already have the 2.8... this way if there is anything different at all... like grounding locations... head shield holes or whatever... you already know where they go... maybe the 3.4 wouldnt have them...
your gonna run into alot of unknown stuff here... mainly because nobody really builds the 2.8 cherokees... they just drive them till they blow and then part them out (one in for sales now being parted out actually) or junked... but if you wanted to be different... lol
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jmarzo
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
16
10-18-2022 04:11 PM
Jamesmon4
Stock Grand Cherokee Tech. All ZJ/WJ/WK Non-modified/stock questions go here!
1
08-16-2016 09:04 PM
Ye Ol' Cherokee
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
8
10-09-2015 10:29 PM
neocracka
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
8
09-05-2015 06:50 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)